Is the Diana Ross "groomer" narrative just Michael Jackson fans trying to deflect from his own allegations?
The consensus in the Michael Jackson fandom is that Diana Ross is a pdf who supposedly groomed and took advantage of Michael when he was a child. Their proof is Michael having a childhood crush on her, scripted TV shows and some urban legend about them sleeping together when Michael was an adult. The fandom claims that those who believe Michael's accusers are creeps who want him to be a predator, but for some reason that doesn't apply to them who literally came up with an obscene pdf fantasy about Diana.
But WHY are they doing this to her? I certainly don't think that it's out of real concern for child exploitation. These are the same people who fiercely defend a man's right to sleep with children and to own photographs of nude boys. Yet according to them Diana – who has no accusers, no history of crossing boundaries with children and a track record of various relationships with men usually quite older than her – is somehow a certified predator.
Is it just me or are they using her to take the heat off Michael who has similar allegations? Like trying to divert it to her by saying "he was a victim of it, the real pdfs are others". Some of them argue that the reason why Michael would sleep with children is because Diana normalized it to him when he was living at her house (even tho there's no evidence of M and D sleeping in the same bed). I'm certain that if one day more undeniable evidence of Michael's crimes came out, the fandom would jump to blame Diana and say that she's the reason why he started preying on children...
FYI: because there's no credible evidence of Diana being inappropriate with little Michael or any child, any comment that reinforces this defaming rumor will be removed for unreasonable speculation