u/Louis_Holden

I get caught cheating in an exam. here is what I have been through.

In short, I cheated during a midterm. And got caught right away.

Now almost two months have passed, and I have formally received my notice of disciplinary hearing.

I want to share a few things from this experience, because honestly there is very little useful information online, and most people only start panicking when it happens to them.

1. Formal admission only happens at the hearing

This is something I did not understand at first.

Whether you admitted anything on the spot, or in private, or in email, the formal position of “admit” or “deny” only really happens at the hearing itself. In that sense, the process works more like a court than a casual meeting with a professor.

So if you ever end up in a marginal case — and I mean a case where the facts are not that clear, or where a professor may suspect something but does not actually have enough evidence at that very moment — my honest advice is: do not talk too much on the spot.

I’m not saying “lie.” I’m saying don’t rush to hand over a knife immediately when the facts and procedure are not even clear yet. There are cases where you may have looked at something you shouldn’t have, but you did not actually gain any advantage, or the evidence is not as straightforward as the professor thinks. In those cases, say less and wait for a follow-up from the professor.

Because once a professor has enough to confidently push your case upward, things can escalate very quickly.

2. Being sent to the Committee is messy for everyone

This is another thing people don’t realize.

Getting sent to the Disciplinary Committee is not some simple process. It is a messy administrative process on both your side and the professor’s side.

I’ve spoken to a professor before, and I also talked to people who were in similar situations. Many professors honestly do not want to spend that much time dealing with disciplinary procedures unless they think the case is serious enough, clear enough, or worth pursuing.

So in some cases, how you react at the beginning actually matters. If you completely hand the knife to the professor, you may make it much easier for the case to be pushed all the way up. If you handle the situation more carefully and explain things properly, sometimes the outcome may still be bad, but not necessarily as severe.

3. Once it goes formal, you will live in misery

This part is mentally the worst.

If your professor decides to formally put you onto the Committee, you will live in misery. You wait for letters. You wait for notices. You wait for the agenda papers. You keep imagining penalties. You keep searching online and finding almost nothing useful.

And HKU, unlike some other universities, does not publicly give a clear chart of “if you do X, you get Y.” There is no neat penalty table that makes you feel safe. That uncertainty becomes part of the punishment.

And to be honest, that is part of the consequence too. You did what you did, and then you live in misery, the stress, and the reflection before the formal hearing even starts.

4. If a professor sends you to the board, he probably believes he has enough evidence

This is the point people need to be realistic about.

If a professor has decided to put your case before the Committee, most likely he already thinks he has enough evidence to make a guilt. At that stage,be careful, it is about damage control.

So what should you do?

Keep your head down. Wait for the agenda papers. See exactly what you are being accused of, and what evidence the University is relying on. Then prepare your response properly.

If the facts are clear, then admit that you were wrong. Do not play smart. Do not act like the whole thing is beneath you. Do not write some fake apology that dodges responsibility.

Write a mitigation that is sincere, specific, and actually responds to the accusation and evidence.

That is probably the most important thing.

5. The penalty range is broad, but first offence usually is not the end of the world

There are very few useful cases online, so everyone imagines the worst.

From what I understand, the penalty range can go from something like a warning / reprimand and failure of the course, all the way to suspension, and expulsion.

But if this is your first offence, then no, your life is probably not over.

Very few first-offence cases end in expulsion. Universities do not casually kick people out unless the case is extremely serious. Expulsion is not just harsh on you — it is also a huge institutional process, and a huge damage to the university reputation.

You are literally dragging the whole higher-up of the university into your process if they want to kick you out. No one wants that.

So if this is your first offence, don’t panic.

6. The board cares about whether you have reflected

This is something a former committee professor told me, and I think it is true.

These people do not want to see students die. They do not sit there to destroy your life. What they want to see is whether you understand what you did, whether you are taking responsibility, and whether there is a real sense of reflection and progression.

They will look at your academic situation, what year you are in, your overall progress. So your mitigation should not just say “I’m sorry.” It should show that you understand why what you did was wrong, what you did after that, and why you should still be given a chance to continue.

That part matters a lot more than people think.

7. The transcript

This might be the most valuable thing in this whole post.

As far as I understand it, the disciplinary outcome itself does not show up on your transcript unless you are expelled. Let me say that again: it does not go on your transcript.

But it will remain permanent in an internal reference folder, whatever that is, I don't know. And most likely. You don't get a chance to study as a postgraduate in HKU again.

8. My honest conclusion

If this happens to you, do not waste time pretending it is not serious. But also do not act like your life is over.

Set your mind right. Wait for the agenda papers. See the accusation clearly. See the evidence clearly. Reflect on what you did. Prepare a proper mitigation. Admit wrongdoing if that is true. Show the Committee that you know exactly where you were wrong and that you are not trying to play games with them.

Most likely, you will fail the course. You will need to retake it. Maybe you will need to delay graduation.

But it is still not the end of the world.

That’s all I want to share for now. I still haven’t received my agenda papers yet, and I’m going to the board next month.

Wish me luck.

reddit.com
u/Louis_Holden — 2 days ago

What is realistically wrong with Jax?!

I really don't know what is in the exact source with this, But any kind of average Jax with double Stoneplate could easily tank more than 20k damage, which is far more than 90% of 3-cost or even 4-cost tanks. Why has not anyone mentioned this ridiculous thing yet?

Worse off, the best single shot shooter right now in the game, Twisted Fate, is exactly in the same comp. The only thing that Jax is afraid of is single burst damage and yet the best burst damage in the game is in the exact same comp.How tf does that even happen?

u/Louis_Holden — 11 days ago