A Washington Orthodontist Said His Son Was ‘Kidnapped to Korea’.  Here Is What Was Left Out
▲ 221 r/TriCitiesWA+1 crossposts

A Washington Orthodontist Said His Son Was ‘Kidnapped to Korea’. Here Is What Was Left Out

Hello Washington,

I am the mother in a public story some people here may have heard before.

For years, Dr. Jay Sung, a Washington orthodontist and Richland father, has publicly described his son as having been “kidnapped to Korea” by his mother.

His story reached media, online communities, government agencies, and officials elected by Washington voters. He also publicly posted about help from Congressman Dan Newhouse and Congresswoman Kim Schrier, and made an award-winning film about my son.

But the version many people heard was not the whole story. Here is the part many people were not told.

I came to Korea with my child for a visit with Dr. Sung’s consent. When we were supposed to leave, my child could not depart because his Korean passport had been reported lost and a reissuance restriction was in place. Under Korean rules, my child could not leave Korea without a valid Korean passport.

After that, I was reported for child abduction. Emergency court orders were obtained in Washington, and a Hague Convention child-return case was filed in Korea.

That is how the public 'kidnapped to Korea' story began.

My child was not missing in the ordinary sense. My child is in Korea with me, and Dr. Sung knows which school my child attends. But my child’s face and name were used publicly as if he were simply a missing child.

My video explains the timeline and records, including:

  • the consented trip to Korea
  • the passport issue that blocked departure
  • the abduction report and Hague case
  • how Dr. Sung interfered with medical care for a medically fragile child
  • almost seven years of unanswered contact attempts
  • forced child-delivery efforts in Korea

I do not speak English well, so I made the video as clearly as I could. I do not make money from it.

The video is based on records that were also part of a defamation complaint Dr. Sung filed against me. Korean authorities declined to prosecute me. Afterward, some Korean media outlets that had reported mainly his side removed their articles.

To me, this issue is about what can happen to the most vulnerable person in the case — the child — when an international convention is used without the full context.

Please watch and consider whether the word “kidnapping” tells the whole story.

Here is the video explaining the untold side of the story: https://youtu.be/IUt0PYcBkNU

 

https://preview.redd.it/xdkq4wv2owah1.png?width=689&format=png&auto=webp&s=63ad22fa9f4027ca6ace8d6b235e49dd196ce06d

reddit.com
u/LowOrganization2315 — 5 days ago
▲ 176 r/korea

The Other Side of the “Kidnapped to Korea” Case in Korean News

Hello everyone,

I wanted to share a Korean news article about a Hague child return case involving Dr. Jay Sung, and also about child-delivery enforcement in Korea.

I am the mother in this case.

Some people in this subreddit may already know Dr. Sung’s side of the story. He has posted several times about his son being “kidnapped to Korea,” and many people supported him based on that story.

His side of the story has also reached many places, including media, Washington State politicians, the Korean Ministry of Justice, and the U.S. State Department. He also appears to have received support from some U.S. politicians and government officials based on his side of the story. He also made a film about this case, Do You Remember Dad?, introduced himself publicly as a director, and received awards.

But there is another side of this story that many people have never heard.

This case has been discussed publicly for years, but mostly from one side.

My child is medically fragile and needs ongoing medical care. This case is about what can happen in a Hague child return case when domestic violence concerns, coercive control, a child’s medical condition, language barriers, immigration status, and the child’s bond with the primary caregiver are not fully understood.

This issue is also related to life in Korea because Dr. Sung’s public campaign around this case eventually contributed to changes in Korea’s child-delivery enforcement rules. As a mother, I am very worried that children can be treated too much like property to be taken and delivered, instead of human beings whose fear, health, safety, and wishes should be carefully considered.

After I shared my concerns in Korean communities, Dr. Sung filed a defamation complaint against me in Korea. Korea has very strict defamation laws, and even true statements can sometimes become a legal problem. But even under that strict system, Korean authorities declined to prosecute me. As I understand it, they did not simply treat my statements as false, and they also recognized the public-interest purpose of my posts, including the purpose of protecting child victims.

After that non-prosecution decision, some major Korean media outlets that had previously reported this case mainly from his side voluntarily removed their articles.

But many people outside Korea still only know the “kidnapped to Korea” version.

That is why I wanted to share this article here.

I also made a short video to explain the timeline and the part of the story that was left out from many public reports. The video is not monetized. I am not asking for money. I am sharing it only because I want people to understand why this case is more complicated than the public story many people heard.

My video:
https://youtu.be/IUt0PYcBkNU

If you have only heard the “kidnapped to Korea” version, I respectfully ask you to read the article and watch the video before judging.

My purpose is to share my side, protect my child’s privacy as much as possible, and raise awareness about how Hague child return cases can affect real children and families.

Thank you for reading.

newsdaily.kr
u/LowOrganization2315 — 17 days ago
▲ 46 r/Living_in_Korea+1 crossposts

A 'child abduction to Korea' story reached U.S. officials and media. But what if key facts were missing?

Hello everyone,

I am the mother in the Hague child return case involving Dr. Jay Sung.

For years, Dr. Sung has publicly described this case as a story of a child 'kidnapped to Korea.' His story reached the media, U.S. government officials, and Washington State politicians. He even made a film about it, Do You Remember Dad?, introduced himself as a director, and received awards.

But there is another side to this story that most people have never heard.

Dr. Sung has publicly said he wants his child back. But he has not personally come to Korea to see the child for nearly seven years. He has not answered the child’s calls for nearly seven years. While presenting himself publicly as a grieving father, he has not maintained a real relationship with the child.

My child needs ongoing medical care because he is medically fragile child. But when my child was in the United States, Dr. Sung interfered with medical access and canceled or opposed medical appointments. The medical bills were placed under the name of a mother who did not speak English well and had no job in the United States, and some of those bills went to collections, where they remain today.

He also repeatedly sought large financial penalties against me because I would not send my medically fragile child to the United States. In my understanding, he sought around $20,000 per month unless the child was sent to him.

This case also had consequences beyond my family.

After years of public pressure surrounding cases like this, Korea changed its child-delivery enforcement rules. The new rules are deeply dangerous for children. They allow children to be treated more like property to be seized and delivered, rather than human beings whose fear, health, safety, and wishes must be protected.

After I shared these concerns with Korean communities, Dr. Sung filed a defamation complaint against me. Korea has strict defamation laws, including laws that can punish even factual statements in some circumstances. Even under that strict system, Korean authorities declined to prosecute me. They did not find my statements to be simply false, and they recognized the public-interest purpose of my posts, including the purpose of helping protect child victims.

After that non-prosecution decision, some major Korean media outlets that had covered the case from his side voluntarily removed their articles.

But many people in the United States still do not know this.

Recently, I saw that U.S. media still described Dr. Sung as receiving support from American public officials. That is why I believe the U.S. government, the U.S. State Department’s Office of Children’s Issues, Washington State politicians, and American media outlets need to understand what can happen when only one side of a Hague case is accepted as truth.

This is not only about me.

This case shows how the Hague Child Abduction Convention can be used in a way that harms children when domestic violence concerns, coercive control concerns, medical vulnerability, and the child’s bond with the primary caregiver are not fully examined.

I made the video based largely on the same records, timeline, and issues that were at the center of that defamation complaint. It is not monetized. I did not make it for money. I made it because I want people to see what was left out of the public story.

Please search Dr. Jay Sung’s public story if you want to understand how far one side of this narrative has traveled.

Then please watch my video and decide for yourself.

My video:
https://youtu.be/IUt0PYcBkNU

My purpose is to share my side, protect my child’s privacy, and raise awareness about a serious public-interest issue.

Thank you!

u/LowOrganization2315 — 15 days ago