u/Lumpy-Background5641

So I got rejected at EMNLP with scores:-
Meta: 3 (very positive in the review)
Reviewers: OA(conf)
3(4)
3(4)
2.5(3)
Avg: 2.83(3.67)
Track: multimodality
Rebuttals never got any acknowledgements. Most weaknesses were already discussed in the paper. What are my options now? As it was my first paper (solo as well).

- If I want to commit to NACL in December. Do i need ti submit to acl arr again or can i use the same arr review discussion?

- even if i go with resubmission at arr. Do the old reviewers likely help? Because as a masters student i cant get stuck in another cycle.

- what is the best overall thing to do in my situation? I need a publication so i can apply for internships.

Regarding the recent heroes journeys, Most responses are “cry more”.
As a maxed player I am happy for the players getting these and I also dont want everything they are getting. But even 30% of ores they are getting would be enough.

Everyone (except the maxxed players) was mad at the A/B testing not being fair. When it had the most negligible impact and knew that ultimately they would be in an event that someone else wouldn’t.

All of us are playing the same game. If one group of players are not happy about something it should affect others too and not segregate themselves as more deserving and defend there positions.

And I am also not mad at Supercell for trying this, it is imperfect and temporary and hoping it will definitely get better (as this doesn’t solve the ore economy problem) because lets be honest with the new equipments every 2 months (mostly good) no one will care about the lvl 15 equipments that are no longer used anyways and everyone will want to upgrade the new equipments.

Anyways game is in a great position overall.