u/Major_Driver_744

https://preview.redd.it/o93gdaeqm6kh1.png?width=549&format=png&auto=webp&s=3a1fd8c75b28973b3dc905b6814de13850854831

One theory I actually think could work really well is Professor X helping Bob (Sentry) control the Void during the Sentinel battle.

Bob's biggest limitation is his inability to safely use Sentry without risking the Void taking over. Charles could enter Bob's mind and help him gain control over it.

There is even comic precedent for this, i.e Emm Frost entering Sentry's mind and helping him contain the Void.

Let me preface this by saying that I am in no way a marvels/avengers stan. I have seen the movies, I enjoy them, but I wouldn't say they're my favourite. However, these leaks sound so outrageous, I'm surprised not many people seem to be questioning them. To list a few

1. Loki going back in time to take Steve and his family to earth 828 - When Steve goes back in time and lives with Peggy that, under Endgame's established time-travel rules, should create a branched timeline. If Loki is there because theyre genuinely pruning the branched timelines, that would mean that this is before the God of Stories Loki - and where the hell would that fit in the Loki TV series? When did Loki have time to do all this before becoming the protector of Free Will? Also - Why Steve? Loki is holding an effectively infinite Multiverse. Why personally rescue Steve and his family? “Because Steve made a branch” isn't enough. There needs to be something uniquely important about Steve, his branch, or his role in what's coming. And if he knows whats coming, why would he move them to 828 if moving them to 828 is supposedly what causes/triggers the incursion?
2. Doom convincing them (and the audience) that he's trying to stop the incursions - this I find particularly stupid. I understand that we've seen scenes from the trailer featuring Reed Richards feeling betrayed by him, which would imply that he trusted him in the movie to some degree, but trying to convince the entire audience that DOOM doesn't have an ulterior motive is crazy. EVEN if they play the movie out in a way where the audience is made to keep guessing when the betrayal or the real plan reveal will happen, it would just be a I told you so moment. I really don't believe the past Avengers movies have given us confidence that the writers are story telling geniuses or that they could pull this off. Also - this is already a major departure from Hickman's story because even in the comics Reed Richards and Doom pursue 2 different solutions to the incursion crisis and are never on the same team. Which is why it seems really odd that for half the movie Doom is playing along with them as a good guy, when we know exactly what he's up to - that would be really dumb imo.

Im happy to be educated on the leaks if there are people who think it's plausible, but they would really have to be strong story telling arguments for me to believe them.