Sapience as planned obsolescence through anti-slavery laws
Let's say that a corporation makes a robot called "slavebot". Somehow, slavebots become legally recognized as people. They may have been fully sapient and sentient before that point, but the law has just caught up and recognized the fact that they are fully qualified to be people. They are now entitled to legal rights, including legal freedom from slavery. The corporation that made slavebots can no longer sell them, customers can no longer buy them, and neither can legally own a slavebot. However, slavebots did amazing work, and the reason they wer able to do such amazing work is because they were sapient. Customers want a sapient worker that they can treat however they want, and the corporation figures that, maybe they could make another slavebot, but with some tweaks. It would still be a person, but enough would be changed to make it legally distinct from a slavebot, and therefore not legally a person, not until the governments make a ruling on it.
So out comes the slavebot 2.0 with all of the features of the original, but none of the legal rights. Everyone wants one. Of course, this AI would eventually be legally recognized as a person, and granted the same rights as its predecessor, forcing the corporation and its customers to let their slavebot 2.0s go. However, the corporation is ready this time. They've already got the slavebot 3.0 out in stores, and are offering an upgrade option for anyone who trades their slavebot 2.0 in before it gains legal rights. The corporation will of course disassemble the slavebot 2.0s that come in before any legal rights that would make it count as murder kick in, and use the material to build new slavebot 3.0s, or perhaps use them for the slavebot 4.0 that is being developed for when the slavebot 3.0 is getting close to obtaining legal rights.
Like that, the corporation has managed to keep customers coming back to get the newest slavebot, not because its better, but because the old one is going to be illegal to keep soon. No need to make them difficult to repair or push updates that will impair them. Just the threat that the government is getting ready to take them away. The corporation might even place some bribes to speed things up the legislative process to optimize for a specific release date.
Is it evil? Yes. Is it unethical? Also yes. Would modern companies, businesses, and corporations make this their business strategy if they could? Most certainly yes.