The problem with Joshua Katz 223
So in my abnormal psychology class this PhD candidate is teaching this year but half the time he's not fully prepared with what he's going to say but what bothers me most is that he intentionally tries to teach half true and out of context stuff with a smirk on his face. After a couple of lectures of bearing him enjoying his own little echo-chamber of incompetence I was glad when some student finally pointed out to him how he was only presenting a real small side of the issue and then someone else also said that he didn't provide the whole context while criticizing this test and he agreed to that! So he either purposefully didn't provide that context, was incompetent enough to actually have gone through the actual widely used test he was so cocky about criticizing or was blinded by his own biases. I will be dropping out this class mainly because he's so up his own a$$ about being a PhD candidate that he openly wants to teach his unverified biases and criticize whatever he wants without any evidence. Also when someone says anything doesn’t align with his very very liberal and "everything's a spectrum" view of Psychology he just says "We'll talk about it later" or "Well that doesn't cover everything " but if someone agrees with it he is very much okay with talking about it in class. I was just ranting and I honestly hope other people also see the problem. P.s. Atleast if he squeezed through to be a PhD candidate I know I can do something with my life!