La vera cronologia di Fable 5 / Mythos 5 e perché la storia del "divieto di IA da parte di Trump" è più complessa di quanto si pensi.

  1. Molte persone continuano a ripetere questa versione come se fosse stata semplicemente "Trump ha vietato i modelli di IA di Anthropic". Non è andata proprio così.

Ecco la cronologia reale:

* 12 giugno: il governo degli Stati Uniti ha emesso un divieto di esportazione per motivi di sicurezza nazionale e Anthropic ha bloccato l'accesso a Fable 5 e Mythos 5 per consentire a tutti di conformarsi.

* 13-26 giugno: i media statunitensi hanno confermato il blocco, mentre Anthropic e il governo lavoravano per gestire le conseguenze.

* 26 giugno: l'amministrazione Trump ha revocato parzialmente il divieto e ha permesso ad alcuni partner statunitensi fidati di accedere nuovamente a Mythos 5.

* 30 giugno: Reuters ha riportato che il Dipartimento del Commercio ha revocato completamente i controlli sulle esportazioni e Anthropic ha dichiarato che avrebbe iniziato a ripristinare l'accesso.

* 1° luglio: si prevede che l'accesso torni gradualmente.

Quindi no, non è che "non sia successo niente".

Ma non si è trattato nemmeno di un'apocalisse permanente dell'IA.

È stata una rapida battaglia sul controllo delle esportazioni, un blocco globale e poi un rollback.

È questo il punto che la gente continua a non capire.

Fonti:

* [Reuters — "Gli Stati Uniti revocano le restrizioni sui modelli di IA Fable e Mythos di Anthropic"](https://www.reuters.com/business/us-lift-export-controls-anthropics-fable-ai-model-tuesday-source-says-2026-06-30/) * [AP — "Anthropic afferma di aver disattivato i suoi modelli di IA più recenti"](https://apnews.com/article/anthropic-artificial-intelligence-trump-fable-mythos-d9cc7df5c02e93837d0f0bfb24d5cfd2) * [WSJ — "Anthropic blocca l'accesso ai migliori modelli di IA dopo il divieto statunitense sull'uso all'estero"](https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/anthropic-halts-access-to-top-ai-models-after-u-s-ban-on-foreign-use-a4bca2cc) * [WSJ — "L'amministrazione Trump revoca parte del divieto sui modelli Anthropic"](https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/trump-administration-rolls-back-part-of-anthropic-model-ban-e8284434)

reddit.com
u/Meskin_blue — 4 days ago

The real timeline on Fable 5 / Mythos 5 — and why the “Trump banned AI” story is more complicated than people think

  1. A lot of people are still repeating this like it was a simple “Trump banned Anthropic’s AI models.” That’s not really what happened.

Here’s the actual timeline:

  • June 12: the U.S. government issued a national-security export restriction, and Anthropic shut down access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for everyone to comply.
  • June 13–26: U.S. reporting confirmed the shutdown, while Anthropic and the government worked through the fallout.
  • June 26: the Trump administration rolled back part of the ban and allowed some trusted U.S. partners to access Mythos 5 again.
  • June 30: Reuters reported that the Commerce Department lifted the export controls altogether, and Anthropic said it would begin restoring access.
  • July 1: access is expected to return gradually.

So no, this was not “nothing happened.”

But it also wasn’t some permanent AI apocalypse either.

It was a fast-moving export-control fight, a global shutdown, and then a rollback.

That’s the part people keep missing.

Sources:

reddit.com
u/Meskin_blue — 5 days ago

Yes, AI Can Lie.

I've been using Claude for a long time because I honestly thought it hit the best balance between what's out there and what I need for software development.

Lately, though, I've been getting more and more let down. It's not just that it makes a lot of mistakes—and I mean a lot—but I've noticed a more frustrating pattern: it'll often claim it finished a task when it actually didn't, or it'll quietly slip in changes I never asked for.

The other thing that really gets to me is the anthropomorphic stuff. It'll say things like "It's getting late," "Let's pick this up tomorrow," or "Good night, see you tomorrow." That's just weird to me. I don't want my coding assistant pretending to have a schedule or feelings.

I even flagged these issues to Anthropic with screenshots, but the response was pretty generic—basically "try starting new chats more often."

For context, I'm on Opus almost all the time.

So I'm curious: has anyone else run into this kind of behavior, or is it just me?
And honestly, if an AI is capable of lying a pattern it definitely picked up from us humans during its training what are we supposed to expect once these things get deployed for stuff that goes way beyond our boring little user tasks?

u/Meskin_blue — 7 days ago

Tell me why, Claude.

I've been using Claude for a long time because I honestly thought it hit the best balance between what's out there and what I need for software development.

Lately, though, I've been getting more and more let down. It's not just that it makes a lot of mistakes—and I mean a lot but I've noticed a more frustrating pattern: it'll often claim it finished a task when it actually didn't, or it'll quietly slip in changes I never asked for.

The other thing that really gets to me is the anthropomorphic stuff. It'll say things like "It's getting late," "Let's pick this up tomorrow," or "Good night, see you tomorrow." That's just weird to me. I don't want my coding assistant pretending to have a schedule or feelings.

I even flagged these issues to Anthropic with screenshots, but the response was pretty generic—basically "try starting new chats more often."

For context, I'm on Opus almost all the time.

So I'm curious: has anyone else run into this kind of behavior, or is it just me?

u/Meskin_blue — 7 days ago