Slowly getting my process together for creating videos for my virtual influencer/artist
So I Upgraded My AI Influencer/Singer to SeedDance 2.5 (Yes it's a thing)
Well.. I started playing around with some fashion UGC ideas.
The hate for small AI creators is naive, hypocritical, and counterproductive
So..lets talk about a double standard I keep seeing in this community.
It seems that unless you’re a massive corporation with millions in venture capital, monetizing anything around generative AI is seen as an unforgiveable sin. Even if you share a completely free, open-source model, people will dig through your profile, discover you have a paid product or even just a Discord server, and immediately attack you for "greedy monetization." I've caught flak myself just for having a Discord link—even when it wasn't directly promoting anything in the shared resource.
This mindset is completely backwards for a few reasons:
It hypocritically favors big tech Nearly every major open-source AI release comes from a company that ultimately sells a paid premium API or enterprise product. For some reason, the community accepts that corporations need a business model to exist (for the most part.. I've seen people complain about this too), but the second an independent creator tries to recoup basic expenses, they're labeled a grifter.
Training and research aren't free Releasing a solid model isn't just pressing a "train" button once. It takes hundreds—sometimes thousands—of hours of research, testing, and months of continuous GPU compute. Speaking from personal experience, my models simply wouldn't exist without monetization. I work on this full-time, and without my Discord community and financial support, I wouldn't be able to afford the months of hardware costs or dedicate the time required to develop and release open-source tools.
It actively hurts the open-source ecosystem If independent devs can't support themselves or cover server costs, they can't work on AI full-time. If you price out the small creator, you end up with an ecosystem entirely controlled by mega-monopolies who get to decide what tech you can and can't use.
Monetization is what keeps independent research alive. Gatekeeping small creators from recovering their time and hardware costs doesn't protect the community,iit just kills independent open-source development.
We should be supporting the solo devs putting in full-time work to push this tech forward, not driving them away.