r/AI_UGC_Marketing

▲ 37 r/AI_UGC_Marketing+3 crossposts

GPT 2.0 + Seedance Motion AD

Prompt for GPT

A strikingly beautiful young woman, early 20s, Southeast Asian or ambiguously ethnic,

natural glowing skin with a faint dewy sheen, sharp jaw, full lips with a subtle pout,

almond-shaped eyes with a heavy-lidded confidence — not overdone, just real. Hair

loosely pulled back, a few strands falling across her face. No heavy makeup. She is

wearing an oversized anime-graphic T-shirt — the graphic is a bold, high-contrast

Japanese anime illustration of a fierce female warrior printed across the chest and

back, faded slightly for a worn-in premium feel. The shirt is cropped-oversized,

falling mid-thigh. She pairs it with low-waist micro denim shorts barely visible

beneath. White Nike low socks. Fresh clean sneakers. Effortlessly underdone.

She is leaning back against a bare concrete pillar, one leg slightly bent, looking

directly into the lens — not smiling, not cold. A gaze that says she doesn't need

your approval but doesn't mind your attention. Mood: unbothered, magnetic, gen-Z cool.

SETTING: Minimalist Tokyo-inspired urban rooftop at blue hour. Hazy purple-blue sky

behind her. Concrete ledge. A faint neon glow from below, out of frame, casting a

soft upward magenta edge light on her right side.

COMPOSITION: Medium-full shot, subject placed rule-of-thirds left. Negative space

to the right. Slightly low angle — shot from about chest height, looking up 10 degrees.

LIGHTING: Blue-hour ambient as base. Subtle practical neon glow (magenta/rose) from

below-right as rim light. Single softbox equivalent from front-left for face clarity.

No harsh shadows. Skin looks real, pores visible, not AI-smoothed.

TYPOGRAPHY (overlay): Top-left corner — brand name in clean, razor-thin Japanese

Gothic typeface, all caps, in off-white: "VOID TOKYO" with a very small registered

trademark symbol. Bottom-right — a smaller line in the same font, lighter opacity:

"ANIME OVERSIZED COLLECTION — SS25"

COLOR PALETTE: Deep muted navy, charcoal concrete grey, warm caramel skin tones.

Accent: electric rose/magenta neon. Minimal. No oversaturation.

STYLE: High-end fashion editorial. Shot on Hasselblad medium-format, 80mm lens,

f/2.2. Film-like tonal depth. Subtle grain. Not Instagram-filtered — editorial-grade.

Think i-D Magazine meets Hypebeast cover. Hyperrealistic, cinematic, 8K resolution.

COLOR GRADE: Cool base with lifted shadows. Slightly desaturated except for the skin

tones and neon which are allowed to pop. Deep blacks. Cinematic contrast.

Aspect ratio: 9:16 (portrait) — optimized for Instagram Story, billboard, and

out-of-home advertising.

Prompt for SEEDANCE

SCENE: "VOID TOKYO — Anime Tee Drop / Fast Cut"

TONE: Frenetic, baddie, kinetic, confident, zero patience

DURATION TARGET: 15 seconds HARD

CHARACTER:

- The Model: Young woman, early 20s, natural skin, effortlessly cool.

Anime-graphic oversized tee, micro shorts, clean sneakers. She moves

constantly — this is NOT a posing ad. She's in motion in every single shot.

SETTING: Multiple fast-cutting locations — all urban, all minimal.

Rooftop / street corner / white flash zone. Location identity doesn't

matter. MOVEMENT matters. The shirt is the product. Every shot sells it.

EDIT RHYTHM: 7–8 cuts in 15 seconds. Average cut = 1.5–2s.

The edit breathes on the beat — every cut lands ON a beat hit or hat.

No transitions except hard cuts and ONE whip-pan. Nothing soft. Nothing cinematic.

AUDIO CONCEPT:

Music — Hard-hitting Gen-Z hyperpop/pluggnb hybrid.

Think: KSG × Ken Carson × Destroy Lonely energy.

Punchy 808, rapid hi-hat rolls, bright synth stab on the hook.

Beat drop at 00:02 — everything before is the tease.

VO — None until the very end. Let the visuals hit.

SHOT SEQUENCE

[00:00–00:01.5] EXTREME CLOSE-UP — Shirt back graphic, hands pulling hem ★ OPENER

Camera: Static macro, dead center. No camera movement.

Action: Two hands (her own, reaching behind) grab the bottom hem of the

oversized tee and SNAP it taut — the fabric pulls tight for one beat,

then releases. The anime graphic on the back stretches and relaxes.

Satisfying fabric tension.

Subject: Back of shirt, graphic fill-frame. Hands visible at bottom.

Context: Bright, clean — white or concrete. Background irrelevant. Shirt IS the frame.

Audio: Music intro — single 808 sub pulse. No beat yet.

SFX: Sharp fabric snap sound (practical, real).

[00:01.5–00:03] MEDIUM SHOT — Front graphic reveal, she spins INTO frame

Camera: Static medium shot. She enters from off-frame spinning 180 degrees

to face camera — the spin reveals the front graphic mid-rotation.

Action: She completes the spin and lands facing the lens. Oversized tee

catches air during spin — lifts and settles. She doesn't smile.

Looks dead-on. Arms loose at sides.

Subject: Full shirt front visible. Graphic clear and centered.

Context: Rooftop, blue-hour, magenta edge light — quick flash of recognizable

location from the Bible image.

Audio: BEAT DROPS AT 00:02. Hi-hats kick. 808 locks.

SFX: Air whoosh from fabric spin.

[00:03–00:04.5] LOW-ANGLE CLOSE-UP — Walk toward camera, shirt hem flapping ★ SHIRT MOTION SHOT

Camera: Camera on ground level, model walks directly toward and OVER it.

Shot is looking straight up as she passes.

Action: She walks in a direct straight line, full stride. The oversized

hem of the shirt swings and flaps with each step — fabric movement is

the whole point. Sneakers visible at entry, then the underbelly of the

shirt fills the frame as she passes over.

Subject: Shirt hem, underbelly of tee, bottom of shorts, sneakers.

Context: Concrete floor. No location needed. Pure product motion.

Audio: Music: Beat driving. Hi-hat rapid roll.

SFX: Sneaker slap on concrete x2 (in beat).

[00:04.5–00:06] CLOSE-UP — Graphic detail, finger traces the print

Camera: Tight static close-up on shirt chest. Rack focus from soft to sharp.

Action: Her finger (manicured, minimal nail) slowly drags horizontally across

the anime graphic on the chest — the fabric bunches slightly under the touch

then smooths. She's showing you the print like she's showing you something rare.

Subject: Shirt graphic, one finger. No face.

Context: Neutral. Doesn't matter. Pure product.

Audio: Music: Hook synth stab hits HERE — bright and punchy over the beat.

SFX: Faint fabric compression under fingertip.

[00:06–00:07.5] WHIP PAN — Location change / energy reset

Camera: Whip pan RIGHT — blurs to white for 3 frames, resolves into

a completely different location (street level, white studio, wherever).

This is the ONE transition in the entire ad.

Action: The whip pan is HER head turning — she whips her head right and

the camera follows into the blur. Coming out of the blur she's already

in the new position.

Subject: Motion blur → her, new position.

Audio: Music: Continuous.

SFX: Whoosh on the whip pan — sharp, quick.

[00:07.5–00:09] BEHIND-THE-SHOULDER MEDIUM — She pulls shirt off shoulder, teases the crop ★ HERO PRODUCT SHOT

Camera: Medium shot from just behind her right shoulder — slightly low angle.

Action: She reaches up and pulls the oversized collar off one shoulder —

the shirt drops to one side, showing the exaggerated oversized fit.

She looks back over the exposed shoulder directly into lens.

One beat. Then drops it back. It's nonchalant, not sexy — just showing the fit.

Subject: Shirt collar, shoulder, the fit proportion. Her face in 3/4 over shoulder.

Context: Street edge / rooftop. Magenta edge light hits the exposed shoulder.

Audio: Music: Melodic vocal chop loops here — the "ahhh" sample.

This is the emotional peak of the track under the visual peak.

[00:09–00:10.5] OVERHEAD FLAT-LAY STYLE — She drops into frame from above

Camera: Dead overhead (bird's eye), static. Camera is looking straight down

at the floor/surface.

Action: She drops/sits quickly into frame from above, cross-legged, shirt

spreading around her. Lands and immediately looks up directly into the

overhead camera — one second of direct eye contact. Then she reaches up

and pulls the shirt graphic toward the lens, stretching it up to camera.

Subject: The shirt from above — full graphic readable from bird's eye. Her face.

Context: White floor / concrete rooftop. Minimal. The overhead removes all location.

Audio: Music: Beat continues, hard.

SFX: Thud of landing (soft, body on floor).

[00:10.5–00:12] RAPID MONTAGE — 3 x 0.5s flash cuts of shirt details

Camera: Three hard cuts, each a different detail macro. Each shot: static, dead sharp.

Cut A (0.5s): Tight on the back collar label — fabric tag, brand name.

Cut B (0.5s): Tight on the side hem stitch — close enough to see thread texture.

Cut C (0.5s): Tight on the sleeve end, slightly rolled — the cotton weight visible.

Action: Static. No movement. Just the garment. Quality signals.

Subject: Garment details only. No body, no face.

Context: Irrelevant — just crisp lit detail shots. White or grey surface.

Audio: Music: Three synth stabs synced to the three cuts. Each cut = a stab hit.

Beat: Punchy, locked to edit.

[00:12–00:15] STATIC MEDIUM — She faces camera, shirt in full, VO hits, title locks

Camera: Clean medium shot, eye level, centered. Static. Held for 3 seconds.

Action: She stands facing camera. Both hands grip the front of the shirt

and stretch it wide toward the lens for one beat — showing the full graphic

flat and readable — then lets it drop naturally. She looks at camera.

Doesn't break eye contact until cut.

Subject: Full shirt, front graphic, her face above it.

Context: Rooftop. Bible image color world returns for the closer.

Audio: Music: Drops to just the 808 tail and vocal sample.

VO (flat, fast, natural voice — her): "New drop. Grab yours."

— 2 words, 2 words. No filler. No pause.

Music OUT: hard cut to silence on the final word.

→ 0.5s of silence before cut to black, then:

TITLE CARD (00:14.5–00:15):

Hard cut to black.

"VOID TOKYO" in thin white caps. Appears as one instant stamp.

No animation. Just there.

SFX: One digital click.

AUDIO MAP

AUDIO MAP

[00:00–00:01.5] Sub pulse only. SFX: fabric snap.

[00:01.5–00:02] Beat builds — single bar anticipation

[00:02] BEAT DROP → hi-hats + 808 lock

[00:02–00:04.5] Main beat. SFX: fabric whoosh (spin), sneaker slaps on beat.

[00:04.5–00:06] Synth stab hook hits on top of beat.

[00:06–00:07.5] Beat continuous. SFX: whip whoosh.

[00:07.5–00:09] Vocal chop sample loops — emotional peak of track.

[00:09–00:10.5] Beat hard, driving. SFX: landing thud.

[00:10.5–00:12] Three synth stabs sync to flash cuts (each one a hit).

[00:12–00:14.5] 808 tail only + vocal sample under.

VO: "New drop. Grab yours."

[00:14.5] Music CUTS (hard stop, not fade).

[00:14.5–00:15] 0.5s silence + title card click.

VOICE DIRECTION (ElevenLabs or real talent):

- Line: "New drop. Grab yours."

- Delivery: Fast, flat, like a voice note. No breath between the two phrases.

She's not announcing — she's telling a friend.

- ElevenLabs: Aria, Turbo v2.5. Stability: 0.35. Similarity: 0.80. Style: 0.1.

ZERO style exaggeration. Record twice, use the flatter take.

DIRECTOR'S NOTES

DIRECTOR'S NOTES

THE CORE RULE OF THIS AD:

Every shot must show the T-shirt doing something — moving, being touched,

being worn in motion. If the shirt is just hanging static in the background,

cut or reshoot. The shirt is the star. She is the delivery mechanism.

GENERATION ORDER:

  1. Shot 2 (spin reveal) — Generate this first using Bible image as character

    reference. This is your character anchor for Seedance.

  2. Shot 3 (low-angle walk-over) — Generate as separate clip. Feed same

    character reference. The sky/ceiling visible = your continuity check.

  3. Shot 7 (hero shoulder pull) — High priority. Use Bible image as first frame.

  4. Shot 9 (overhead drop) — Unique angle, no face consistency needed,

    generate freely. Just match the shirt.

  5. Shots 1, 4 (macro/detail) — Easy, no character needed, generate last.

  6. Shot 10 (rapid montage) — Do in post: shoot/generate 3 garment detail

    stills and cut-flash them to the beat. Easier than video generation.

  7. Shot 11 (final medium close) — Use Bible image as first frame.

    She stretches the shirt toward camera — this is a Seedance "last frame"

    anchor for the outro.

EDIT INSTRUCTIONS (CapCut / Premiere):

→ Cut every clip on the beat. Open the track in CapCut, drop beat markers

at every kick/snare hit. Every cut must land within 1–2 frames of a marker.

→ Shot 10 (3x flash cuts): each clip is 12–15 frames (0.5s at 25fps).

These feel like the beat is slicing, not you.

→ The whip pan (Shot 6): If Seedance doesn't generate a clean whip, fake it

in post — blur filter on the transition frames, speed ramp the cut.

→ Overall color grade: Match Bible image. Cool base, deep blacks, magenta rim

in outdoor shots, clean neutral in detail shots. Add light grain over all.

→ Aspect ratio: Generate in 9:16 for Reels/TikTok. Crop a 1:1 version for feed.

SPEED SETTINGS (all clips play at 100% — no slow-mo in this version):

→ Shot 3 (walk-over) can be slightly sped up (+10–15%) if it drags.

→ Shot 9 (overhead drop) — real-time. The natural speed of sitting down IS fast.

WHAT MAKES THIS GEN-Z vs. FASHION FILM:

→ Gen-Z: Cuts on the beat. Fast. Shows the product from weird angles.

She moves, the shirt moves. Done in 15s.

→ Fashion film: Slow-mo, breathing room, vibe > product. NOT THIS.

→ Every second should make someone pause their scroll.

u/GrabVegetable3555 — 22 hours ago

Finally using Virtual UGC to make my AI tool stack pay for itself

As a digital marketer, my monthly overhead for AI tools was starting to get a bit ridiculous. Between my CRM, ChatGPT, Midjourney, and video subs, I am spending before I get any return. Idk if other people deal with this but yeah, thats where I'm at.

I spent weeks trying to create Virtual UGC using Runway Gen-3 and Kling. I wanted a virtual creator holding a product and talking, hence saving me the actual content creator fees which also adds up.

Runway: The visual fidelity is insane great, the way it handles skin texture and high-end cinematic lighting is totaly on point. When it comes to the physics, though, it was just off, often the character moved their hand, the product would warp, which is a total waste of time.

Kling: It is hard to keep the character consistant across different shots.

By the end of it, I actualy went back to Fiverr to look for real creators because I figured, it is either me, or the tech is not quite there yet. I was ready to accept that Id just have to keep paying the $300 shipping and creator fees to promote some products.

A buddy of mine in a Discord group sent me a clip of a character he created holding up a phone. He told me he used a few minutes to create a clip with PixVerse V6. I was honestly annoyed because I didnt want to learn again and to be dissapointed, again.

I signed up just to prove him wrong. My first render was actualy a failure too, I used a basic prompt and the lighting was flat and I just wasnt feeling it.

The click happend when I stopped letting the AI guess what I wanted and started actually utilizing the Character Consistancy and Regional Control tools. I am able to lock in the face and animate the product. It still took me 4 or 5 tries to get a clip that was useable, and I lost track of how many credits I burned through, but I finaly felt like I was getting somewhere.

For the first time, I had 15 seconds of footage where the girl actualy looked like the same human being from start to finish and it looked passible that it seems like it was shot under a ring light.

It is not perfect, regardless I starting show the how to video of this workflow. I even applied for its affiliate program, and those recurring commisions got to $185 this month.

The income is meager at best. But between the money saved on hiring real creators and the affiliate payouts, my subs are finaly subsidized.

For it to monetize, dont dump a tool because the first render is bad. Document your workflow, find the tool that handles the specific technical bottleneck (for me, it was character stability), and let the affiliate commisions help you while you try to get better at it!

reddit.com
u/Stir_123 — 21 hours ago

I made a full AI UGC video for a skincare brand called Lumya from scratch.

So I want to share my full process because when I was starting out I could not find anyone actually breaking this down properly.

A skincare brand called Lumya reached out needing product content and UGC style videos.

No big budget, no production team. Just me. And honestly at first I had no idea if AI tools could pull off something that looked genuinely premium for a beauty brand.

I started with the creative direction first, which I think most people skip.

I wrote out the mood, the color palette, the emotion I wanted the viewer to feel. Warm tones, soft light, that elevated skincare aesthetic.

Without this step the AI generations just feel random and disconnected.

Then I moved into video generation using Seedance 2.0. The key for me was writing very specific cinematic prompts rather than generic ones. Instead of "woman applying skincare" I was writing things like slow motion close up, golden hour light, product in focus, emotional and intimate mood. That level of specificity is everything.

I ran multiple iterations, kept what worked, and locked in the seeds for visual consistency across clips so the whole thing felt like one cohesive video and not a random mix of generations.

The final output genuinely looks like something a production team would charge dollars for.

I delivered it solo in a fraction of the time.

If you are trying to break into AI UGC for beauty or lifestyle brands, the creative brief you write before touching any tool is your actual product. The AI just executes it.

Happy to answer any questions.

u/himashreeeee — 2 days ago

Been running AI UGC as a done-for-you service for DTC brands, here's what's actually working

Wanted to share some honest observations from running AI UGC for a handful of DTC ecommerce and SaaS brands over the last few months, since this community actually gets the nuance around this stuff.

The setup:

I started a done-for-you AI creative studio called VIRALINN. Brands send over their offer, existing winning angles, and any reference content they like. We handle scripting, AI avatar selection, variations, and delivery of ready-to-run creatives.

For DTC specifically, the goal is volume and speed. Brands with a winning ad want 15-20 variations of that angle without waiting on creator schedules or reshoots. For SaaS clients it's a bit different, it's more about turning feature docs, help pages, and onboarding flows into short UGC-style explainer clips.

What's actually been working:

- Brands that already have at least one proven angle get the most out of this. AI helps you riff on what works, not find what works from scratch.

- Mixing AI UGC with a smaller set of real creator content seems to perform better than going 100% AI. The human content handles trust, the AI handles volume.

- The scrappier and less polished the output looks, the better it tends to perform on cold traffic. Overly slick AI UGC gets sniffed out fast.

- For organic content, AI generated images and short clips have been filling the gaps between bigger production pieces really well.

Where it breaks:

- Any niche where credibility is really personal (coaches, consultants, anyone selling based on their own face/story) doesn't translate well.

- If the brand doesn't have clarity on their hook or ICP, AI just makes you test bad angles faster.

- Some platforms are getting better at flagging obvious AI avatars in comment sections so mixing styles matters.

Put some examples from recent work up at if you want to see what the output actually looks like.

Curious what others are seeing:

- What niches have you found AI UGC performs best in?

- Are you mixing real and AI content or going full AI for some clients?

- Any platforms giving you more grief than others right now with AI creative?

reddit.com
u/Afraid-Reading-8655 — 2 days ago

Testing a new workflow for commercial product shots. Thoughts? 🪒⚡

Just finished this quick shaver project to see how the software handles metallic reflections and water simulation. I am trying to see how close we can get to a traditional studio look using the right tool and prompt setup. The details on the blades came out pretty clean, but I had love to get some constructive feedback from people who do product design or advertising. How does the quality look to you guys, and where do you think this kind of workflow fits into the current e-commerce market?

u/the_emilyharper — 2 days ago

This AI perfume test looks way too real. Ready for ads? 💎✨

Just made this luxury product shot to see how it handles reflections and the perfume spray. No weird glitches, and the text on the bottle is super sharp. The right tool and prompt combo make a huge difference. Is this ready for real commercials? Where does it stand in the market?

u/the_emilyharper — 2 days ago

Gemini Omni just killed the AI UGC product segment - Arcads, Creatify etc.

Gemini Omni just one shotted a UGC video that took me hours to get "right" on Arcads. It has a Gemini watermark, but suspect there will soon enough be a solution for that. Annoyed at how much I've spent on AI UGC tools to get poor results 9/10 times.

reddit.com
u/stats1101 — 2 days ago
▲ 5 r/AI_UGC_Marketing+1 crossposts

Looking to partner with someone who can create content for my app

Hello I am a app developer and I am having trouble finding distribution. I am looking to partner with someone who know content creation well and is capable of it. I am looking for something long term where I can keep launching more app and someoen to help market. Please DM/comment if you think you will be a good fit.

Thanks

reddit.com
u/Alarmed-Ad3086 — 3 days ago

How does Creatify calculate credit usage? When I create a 90-second script-to-avatar talking head video, it costs 80 credits. A 5-second voiceover avatar talking head video costs 20 credits."

I am looking for transparency on the charges, so I can compare the most cost saving ways to create video. Appreciate insight from AI video creators.

reddit.com
u/Due-Worldliness6912 — 2 days ago

Made this cool energy drink ad using just a product photo. Here's how

u/image1 as the main product for this high end commercial ad Shot 1 (0:00-0:02): Black void erupts with crackling green lightning bolts splitting the darkness, volumetric green fog rolls toward camera, low angle looking up, wide-angle lens, aggressive energy builds, whip pan right into Shot 2. Shot 2 (0:02-0:03): Resolves from rightward whip into jagged obsidian rocks exploding upward from ground, green mist swirling between fragments, debris flying toward camera, handheld shake, speed ramp from slow to full speed, smash cut into Shot 3. Shot 3 (0:03-0:04): Hard cut from impact into extreme close-up of u/Image1Image1 black metallic surface covered in condensation droplets, single droplet races downward catching neon green light, macro lens paper-thin focus, slow motion at 25% speed, tilt down follows the droplet into Shot 4. Shot 4 (0:04-0:05): Tilt continues downward into u/Image1Image1 macro detail, condensation bead magnified on the curved can surface, green claw logo distorted through water droplet lens, rim light edges every ridge of the metallic texture, gentle push in, matched zoom accelerates into Shot 5. Shot 5 (0:05-0:07): Resolves from zoom into medium shot of u/Image1Image1 rising powerfully through a cracking stone surface, green fog erupting around the base, rocks tumbling away in all directions, low angle looking up at the emerging can, crane up follows the rise, lightning flashes backlight the scene strobing the MONSTER ENERGY branding, crane continues into Shot 6. Shot 6 (0:07-0:08): Crane momentum carries into bird's eye view looking straight down at shattered rock crater, u/Image1Image1 centered below in perfect symmetry, green energy pulses outward in expanding rings across the broken stone floor, slow orbit begins clockwise, orbit continues into Shot 7. Shot 7 (0:08-0:09): Orbit continues clockwise transitioning to eye level, u/Image1Image1 surrounded by swirling green storm clouds in a dramatic three-quarter composition, twin lightning strikes crack violently in the background, debris and condensation droplets suspended mid-air frozen in slow motion, Steadicam float holds the tension, speed ramp drops to slow motion, energy settles, hard cut into Shot 8. I ran all of this in the Atlabs UGC Workflow. Shot 8 (0:09-0:11): Hard cut into extreme close-up of u/Image1Image1 pull tab at the top of the can, a single finger enters frame from above and cracks it open, green pressurized mist hisses explosively outward from the opening catching neon backlight, macro lens shallow focus isolates the tab detail, the erupting hiss blows the entire frame to a white flash into Shot 9. Shot 9 (0:11-0:12): Flash resolves into medium close-up of neon green liquid energy pouring downward from u/Image1Image1, splashing violently across jagged black rocks below, electric green neon glow reflects off every wet stone surface, high-speed capture at 20% speed stretches every splash droplet, tracking shot follows liquid flow downward, pull back begins revealing into Shot 10. Shot 10 (0:12-0:15): Pull back continues revealing u/Image1Image1 in full hero composition, the can commanding the center of frame atop a jagged rocky throne, twin lightning bolts cracking symmetrically behind it, dense green fog churning at the base, volumetric green light shafts piercing downward through the storm above, low angle telephoto compression makes u/Image1Image1 monumental against the chaos, locked-off hero hold, frame settles on the MONSTER ENERGY logo glowing in neon green. Heavy electronic bass with industrial metal edge, high-end professional sound effects matching every action, impact, crack, hiss, and transition throughout.

https://reddit.com/link/1tib8gx/video/3fghph5c282h1/player

reddit.com
u/Akashhh17 — 2 days ago
▲ 7 r/AI_UGC_Marketing+1 crossposts

Built a cinematic spec campaign for a streetwear brand using AI, here's the result

This is a spec campaign I built for VELOUR which is a mock streetwear brand I created to develop my portfolio.
No brief from a client yet. Just a creative direction I set myself: rooftop, night, tonal dressing, zero noise. The goal was to see how close I could get to a real fashion film using only AI tools.
Stack used: Seedance 2.0 for the video, cinematic prompt engineering for the shot structure and grade direction.
This is the lane I'm building in, a cinematic AI creative direction for fashion and beauty brands. Not UGC, not talking heads. Editorial-grade output that a brand could actually run.
Portfolio: nandyvisuals.com/mediakit
Open to feedback from anyone who works with brands on the creative side on what reads as premium to a buyer and what doesn't?

u/Deep-AiVisualz — 2 days ago

Rate this AI skincare commercial. Ready for brands or nah? 🧏‍♀️

Testing some new video tech with a beauty product setup. The transition from the pouch to the mask application came out super clean. If you get the tool and prompt right, the output looks completely premium. Where do you think this tech sits in the ad industry right now?

u/the_emilyharper — 3 days ago
▲ 10 r/AI_UGC_Marketing+1 crossposts

Built a workflow to clone any fashion video with your products. DM for early access

Have tested over 100+ videos across categories like:

  1. Get Ready With Me (GRWM),
  2. OOTD,
  3. Lookbook videos

Still fails in 10-20% cases. Looking for early users to share feedback!

u/kinraw — 4 days ago

I made this AI UGC-style video featuring a power bank. Let me know what you guys think about this.

This video is just one personal test, but I think the broader implication is important:
AI may change ad production not by making one perfect ad — but by making iteration dramatically cheaper.

Would love to hear how others in marketing and creative are evaluating this tradeoff.

u/Aggressive-Super — 3 days ago

AI fashion transitions are getting too clean. Where does this even stand? 👗👀

Just tested a try on video with fast outfit swaps and honestly the quality surprised me. The clothes stayed clean, faces didn’t glitch much, and the transitions looked pretty smooth even in a raw render. Feels like the tool and prompt quality makes a huge difference here. Do you think this is ready for real ads already, or still more of an experimental AI workflow?

u/the_emilyharper — 3 days ago