Conflicted Over Two Different Itineraries
Hi again. I am really conflicted over two different itineraries, and I would love advice and opinions of them. I know in the end it will be up to me but I feel a little overwhelmed. I want to see and do as much as I can haha. This will be my first trip to Japan (and I do plan on coming back) for 3 weeks in late March-early April next year.
Itinerary A looks like this: 4N Tokyo, 2N Kanazawa or Hiroshima, 5N Kyoto, 2N Kanazawa or Hiroshima, 3N Nagoya, 2N Kawaguchiko, 2N Tokyo. I’m just not sure if this seems too busy? Is it too much spending time riding on trains, esp with at least 3 day trips in mind?
Itinerary B would be this: 5N Tokyo, 6N Kyoto, 4N Nagoya, 2N Kawaguchiko, 1N Hakone?, 2N Tokyo. Less traveling with this one. Day trips with this itinerary too. Unsure about including 1N in Hakone.
Each itinerary gives me room to fiddle with the amount of days in each place.
Obviously I would, in theory, be able to see and do more with option A, but perhaps less time to actually enjoy the 2N locations in particular? I have read so many itineraries on here and opinions, but I would just like advice so I can narrow my trip planning down. I know I have plenty of time; I have already booked several accommodations with free cancellation and no payment yet. Certain Ryokans I want to book can’t be booked until 6-3 months out. I just like having an itinerary ready in mind in early. Thank you.