u/MoreTODplz

The last proper network development plan that was formally released was in 2012, and now that's been greatly changed now as well. Then there was the 2018 leaked plan. Right now I'm not sure what the long term development plan actually is other than the Suburban Rail Loop and Airport Rail.

There's no long term plan in terms covering the City Loop Reconfiguration, Metro 2 or any of the extensions in the leaked 2018 plan. I understand most of the budget is going to the SRL and LXRPs right now but like... should it not at least be planned or a timeline set out?

If the government can commit 10s of billions of dollars for the SRL, I see no reason to why they can't at least think about projects they want to commit to other than just the SRL. For example, there was no concrete plans for the Doncaster extensions but that was still included in the 2012 development plan.

I just want them to commit to something that isn't just pouring money into huge large scale projects. I haven't seen a concrete timeline for the Melton electrifications either. How can you set timelines for large scale projects such as the SRL but not for smaller works like Melton electrification?

By the year 2035. Assuming that the SRL, Melton electrification & Upfield extension to Wallan, the Airport Link and the Sydney Metro all go ahead we'll see

Sydney:

• 112km of metro
• 335km of suburban train network.
• 447km total transit network.
• 25% of their total network will be a metro.
• 2 Airports, 2 Airport lines.
• 2 proper CBDs (Parramatta - This one is more of a geographical advantage that Sydney has, really can't compete here).

Melbourne:

• 26km of an automated metro line.
• 1 Airport line.
• 0 proper secondary CBDs. (Just look at the station precinct impression plans, and tell me if you think they can rival Parramatta, they can't.)
• Total suburban network of 492 km (+62km in extensions and Airport Link)
• Total train network of 518km. (+26km from with SRL)
• 5% of our total network would be a metro.

Someone explain to me, how Sydney can build 112km of metro in 22 years (2013-2035), or about 5.0km every year and we'll be stuck building the SRL North and East (~35km + 26km) which is 61 km in 28 years or about 2.1km every year. They're building twice as fast as we are and they're building it cheaper. I find it difficult to believe that this is purely because of geological difference in the stones that both our cities sit on.

People here like to claim that it's because Sydney is just sandstone while Melbourne is more difficult to dig through. Sure, but TBMs can dig the tunnels anywhere between a few months to a year, right? That doesn't explain why it takes so long to actually install the rails and the wirings within the tunnels themselves. I swear saying it's geology and just geology is just copout answer at this point.

A part of me think's its in part of the CFMEU corruption which is certainly true to an extent but I don't think it can account for Sydney building more than twice as fast.

The University of Melbourne has cancelled a prestigious lecture by eminent Australian cardiologist Professor Peter McDonald after Zionist pressure. Wendy Bacon reports.

Eminent Australian cardiologist Professor Peter McDonald who was scheduled to give a prestigious lecture at University of Melbourne in July has been ‘cancelled’ due to behind-the-scenes pressure from Zionists.

Second time cancelled

This is the second occasion on which Macdonald, who supports Palestinian rights and has attended rallies, has been cancelled due to pressure from Zionists.

Last year he was on forced leave from St Vincent’s Hospital in Sydney for seven weeks before the complaint against him by doctors associated with the Australian Zionist Healthcare Alliance ( AZHA) was dismissed following an independent investigation.

Macdonald was contacted but declined to comment for this story.

“Unnamed accusers” – invite withdrawn

On June 12, more than a month after the lecture was first promoted, University of Melbourne Acting Head of Surgery Professor Justin Yeung and St Vincent’s surgeon and Adjunct Professor Matthew Read who chairs the Surgical Forum sent a letter withdrawing the invitation.

They informed Macdonald that “concerns” were raised regarding remarks attributed to you that have been “widely interpreted as antisemitic”.

After “careful” consideration, the organisers had come to the conclusion that the remarks could distract from the forum event. This suggests that those who made the decision understood that if they did not withdraw their invitation, Macdonald’s unnamed accusers would conduct a public campaign against him.

The accusers were referring to a 30 second question that Macdonald asked at a Palestinian Justice community forum last year during which he said that before he had been informed by the Australian government that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) was responsible, he considered that Mossad could be behind some antisemitic incidents.

(Mossad itself acknowledges that it conducts extensive covert operations including embedding agents in other countries including Iran.)

Melbourne's growing pretty fast and some inner city routes services by trams are struggling to meet capacity. Converting them to light rail would be a good start, but I do think it's worthwhile considering a proper metro network, or the start to one.

It's quite expensive to tunnel here, which makes me think whether an elevated Metro would be a good idea. Opposition to it would be fierce especially compared to an underground network. We could embrace cut and cover, but I that wouldn't be free from fierce opposition either, especially since we tried that with the Metro Tunnel on Swanston St and Libs compared it to the Berlin Wall.

When I was a kid I always envisioned a futuristic city to have a lot of elevated rail lines, a lot like Gothams elevated train line in Batman Begins. Now if a metro were to exist, what routes do you think could work right now?

And I’m sorry but elevated trains just look so much cooler 😭

View Poll

Separated by Infrastructure Australia and Infrastructure Victoria, I only listed projects that I think would relate to transit and mainly passenger rail and active transit.

Infrastructure Australia 2026 priority list

10 year national priorities from Infrastructure Australia

• Immediate priority for future investment
  • Suburban Rail Loop East.
• 2-4 year pipeline for future investment
  • Melbourne Airport Rail Link
  • High Capacity Signalling
  • Melbourne rail upgrade program – North (extensions and electrifications)
  • Melbourne rail upgrade program – West (extensions and electrifications)
• 5-10 year pipeline for future investment
  • Melbourne Orbital/E6 transport corridor.
  • Suburban Rail Loop - Future Stages: SRL West and SRL North.

Infrastructure Victoria priority list and recommendations

By 2030

• Make government infrastructure more accessible: Make bus and tram stops more accessible. Victoria already missed its legal deadline in 2022.
• Extend the tram network: 8 tram extensions to start building by 2030.
  • Swanston Street to Kensington
  • Spencer Street to Flemington Bridge
  • Anzac train station to Fishermans Bend North
  • Southern Cross Station to Fishermans Bend South
  • East Malvern to Hughesdale via Chadstone
  • East Brighton to Moorabbin
  • Melville Road to Batman train station in Coburg
  • Wattle Park to Burwood East.
• Run faster bus services, more often, in Victoria’s largest cities: Higher frequencies on and off-peak. Straightening out existing routes and creating new routes in growth areas.
• Build a Bus Rapid Transit network with 6 new routes.
  • Melton - Broadmeadows
  • West Tarneit - Highpoint
  • Watergardens - Point Cook
  • Huntingdale - Upper Fern tree Gulley
  • Southland - Endeavour Hills
• Extend the metropolitan train network and run more services in the west: Melton electrification. Running more services on the Wyndham vale region and a new Altona North station.
• Upgrade train infrastructure and run more services in Melbourne’s north: Duplicate the Upfield line. Rezone the land for more housing. New stations at Campbellfield and Beveridge.
• Run more bus and coach services in regional Victoria:
• Make off-peak public transport cheaper and simplify regional fare zones
• Make local streets safer for children and communities: Reduce speed limits to 30km/h on local streets. Starting with areas frequented by children.
• Build safe cycling networks in Melbourne and regional cities: Build more protected and connected cycle corridors in Melbourne, Geelong, Ballarat, Bendigo and Wangaratta
• Create and preserve opportunities for future major infrastructure projects: Includes City Loop Reconfiguration. Various Extensions and Electrifications, Melbourne Metro 2 and the E6 corridor.

Future Options

• Extend metropolitan trains to growth areas in Melbourne’s north and south-east: Craigieburn to at least Kalkallo and possibly Wallan. Upfield to at least Roxburgh Park. Cranbourne to Clyde.
• Charge people fairly to use roads: Introduce road charges that help manage congestion and improve productivity,
• City Loop Reconfiguration. Digging two tunnels to through run more services allowing for greater capacity.

In my opinion the most underrated projects are the City Loop Reconfiguration and High Capacity Signalling. Not inexpensive by any stretch, but the most underrated. The most influential is definitely still bus reform and the SRL. Just my opinions, feel free to disagree lol.

The Urban Growth Boundary was extended in 2010 and currently it requires a majority in both houses of Parliament to be altered. Which in my opinion, isn't strict enough. It needs to be HARDER and borderline impossible to sprawl further, maybe have it so that if you want to create new housing estates you have to ensure that all transit connections have a minimum amount of density first. Ensuring that if you want to build sprawl, you build them up before sprawling outwards.

I'm no lawyer/politician so I'm not sure how easy something like this can be done but there needs to be. There needs to be a way that we can permanently create an urban greenbelt that cannot be built past at all. We've ruined so much space for suburban housing, which just makes it that much more difficult for densifying and better transit connections.

Wanted to reduce Australian exposure and I think this is good enough. Not entirely sure. BGBL doesn’t have emerging markets so that’s a problem but other than that it’s fine?

Is there a simpler two ETF basket that has most international markets but also reduced australian exposure?

I’m 20 in terms of risk exposure so no bonds for now.

Worried about the polls, but whatever we'll see what happens come November.

My question is what happens to the TOD/densification around the SRL Stations? How much of the $35 billion is actually allocated to the densification rather than building the rail itself?

Could the entire densification be cancelled?

"Oh no but the cost!!!, It's too expensive!! It'll be useless!!, transit is useless!!"

A few years after it opens and now almost everyone in Sydney's suddenly demanding the metro be extended to their backyards. Fairly sure there's something like $60 billion or more being invested into the Metro right now. It's been a huge success and I think the SRL will largely be the same once finished.

Well, I guess the media love anything the Libs cooked up, so they probably helped with the initial perception of it anyway (Also Sydney just generally has more people who like transit). In all fairness I wouldn't hesitate as much to vote for the NSW libs (not our ones) for transit. At least they actually privatised and built something instead of privatising shit for the fun of it.

And the media has an intense hatred for all things Melbourne, Transit and Labor so they'll try to hate it any way they can but the court of public opinion will 100% change, no matter how hard MSM try to spin it. Even in the polls more than 50% of people supported it. Although not sure how recent they were.

JUST LET THEM FINISH IT. PLEASE. PLEASE

WAM is atrocious. Went through a pretty bad mental period and failed a few subjects, nothing too drastic tho. Had to retake them and now my WAM is 60 on the dot and I've still got a year left to go. I'm wondering if I should just quit tbh and whether doing this degree was worth it.

I was considering doing a masters to boost it. The content of that maths wasn't that difficult, so I'm not worried about failing again, I just wasn't in the mental state to actually study properly. Either masters or an honours year. Honours isn't offered at this uni for maths so I guess I'd have to change.

Anyways, I was just wondering if anyone actually got a decent paying job with a maths degree if they got a bad WAM. That's all. Thank you.

Just a bit lost on what to actually do. I've almost finished my degree. My last year is next year. Hopefully. Now I'm just wondering if there's actually roles available in the government etc, with a maths degree and if they pay well.

Or if there are actually any private sector roles that also deal with transit that hire maths employees.

My major is Applied Maths, if that helps. Although I can change it pretty much right now to other if I wanted to.

Would it be better if I compliment my degree with something else like a physics double major? (physics is the only option since I did do some physics units earlier in my degree, but it adds some time to my degree).

If I could go back in time I'd just do an Urban Planning Degree but I'm already an aging dinosaur :/