Hi FI Community,
Does anyone have a good recommendation for a free share portfolio tracker pls? I have tried to google it, either too complicated to use or free to certain holdings/ entries before you have to pay.
Thanks
If the goal is to tax "real gains", why aren't losses indexed as well?
For example, if I make 2 investments:
Investment A is $100000 that breaks even nominally
Investment B $10000 that makes 10% over 2 years
Assuming 2.5% inflation / indexation rate, then:
Investment A has made a loss of $5062.50 in real terms
Investment B has made a gain of $493.75 in real terms
I've made a real loss of $4568.75, yet I pay 30% tax on the $493.75 as though I'm earning $205k per year?
The intent of the 30% minimum is outlined in this budget document much more clearly than the Prime Minister or Treasurer have explained:
>A minimum tax rate of 30 per cent will apply to real capital gains accruing from 1 July 2027 (with no impact until the income is realised). This will not affect people whose capital gains are already taxed at rates of at least 30 per cent.
The introduction of the minimum tax reduces the benefit of taxpayers deferring capital gains realisation to years where their marginal tax rates are low. It ensures their gains are subject to a tax rate closer to the rate they faced during their working life and is commensurate with the tax rate paid by most workers.
Recipients of means-tested income support payments, such as the Age Pension or JobSeeker, will be exempted from the minimum tax if they receive any payment in the financial year in which they realise the capital gain.
As you can see in the chart, 30% is much higher than the median effective tax rate. It is even higher than the effective tax rate of the top 10% of earners.
Why would someone who has retired early and is not relying on government welfare pay the highest effective tax rate?
Why should they pay a higher tax rate than super?
I'm sorry to ask but I'm really unclear on this. If one waits to sell shares or property after July 2027, will they retain the benefits of the 50% CGT discount of owning the asset for greater than a year up to 01/07/2027 as part of your annual indexed tax return?
Or will all assets be taxed at 30c in the dollar from that date? Meaning you need to flog off as much as possible beforehand at a lower tax rate?
It’s really confuse with this package fee in my home loan with CommBank . Any idea ?
Hi everyone,
Just wanted to get some opinions on my long-term investing plan before I start putting larger amounts in consistently.
A bit about me:
Right now I’m thinking of splitting investments roughly 50-50 between Australia/global ETFs and Indian mutual funds.
Australia side (~AUD $1,500/month):
India side (~₹1 lakh/month):
The idea is to keep things relatively simple while still having:
Would love some feedback:
Still learning, so open to suggestions and different opinions.
Thanks!
Hi guys, I am a first-time investor looking for advice. 21 and in my final year of mechatronics engineering. Curreently earn appx $500 a week while studying and close to $1200 a week during uni breaks.
I recently started investing in May this year with an initial A$5,000 invested across four US positions on Stake (NVDA, META, QQQ and SCHD). I have a documented strategy focused on holding for 12+ months to qualify for the 50% CGT discount. I have a small cash reserve with predefined deployment triggers and a written plan covering stop losses, thesis invalidation criteria and decision trees.
I am now looking to expand beyond my current investments by opening a CMC account to dollar-cost average into ASX ETFs from my regular income, building a separate long-term portfolio alongside my existing US positions. My broader goal is to achieve FIRE. I am early in the journey, learning as I go and trying to build disciplined habits from the start. Happy to share my strategy document if useful and open to any advice you guys have
Amidst the wailing here, one of the few actionable suggestions is whether to shift from growth towards income producing assets. Betashares has its take and an example.
>As a rule of thumb, for an investor on a marginal tax rate above 30%, the two methods produce the same tax outcome when the nominal capital gain is roughly double the cumulative inflation on the original cost base. Above that threshold, the new regime is worse; below it, the new regime is more favourable. For investors on a marginal tax rate below 30%, the 30% minimum tax floor means the new rules will generally produce a materially worse outcome.
Stating the obvious, but most of us know that growth assets are most negatively affected by the change. Yet,
>In our scenario analysis above, the shift to indexation reduces the after-tax outcome for Investment 1 by $1,844 (from 7.39% p.a. to 6.83% p.a.). Yet Investment 1 still finishes $2,595 ahead of the income-oriented Investment 2 on an after-tax basis. While this tax change will generally have a negative impact for accumulators who prioritise growth over income, it is not a reason to dump growth assets. Tax should never be the only consideration when building an investment portfolio, and the long-term return premium from growth assets remains the strongest contributor to outcomes for accumulators.
>The new regime narrows the after-tax advantage of growth assets within our scenarios, but it does not eliminate it. For investors on marginal tax rates below 47%, the drag is also less pronounced.
>For wealth accumulators with a long time horizon, growth assets are still likely to be the best asset class
tldr; Don't do anything drastic, continue to DHHF and chill. My other life advice is that you can only react to what you can control, so I don't need replies to this to be like the other 100 threads where you put in your 2c about the changes.
Under the new proposal for indexation of cost base, it should follow that if growth is less than CPI, capital loss should be claimable.
E.g. I buy CBA stocks at $100 today. After 10 years, let's say they still remain at $100, whilst CPI is 3% pa. CPI adjusted cost base will be $134, and I can claim $34 as capital loss.
I hope that this will be implemented if the CGT changes go through. It will affect the way I invest.
Prior to the CGT changes I was about to sell my Brisbane-based investment property.
The property is valued at $1.35m and currently leased for $780/week rent
It has a $760k mortgage and is negatively geared.
I've seen many people in this sub encouraging those who hold negatively geared properties to take advantage and hold forever to milk the negative Gearing, but while those rules are still in place, I had already decided to sell. Now the advantage is tempting me to keep the property.
Purchased this property in 2021 for $633k - a part of me wants to hold, but the other part of looks at the current rental yield % and growth profile and thinks that it is time to cash in.
My plan for the $430k profit was to pay down my PPOR ($300k) and put $130k in super
Is there a way to assess this that I am not seeing.
Pls advice is it worth to invest in investment bonds as a high income earners, by following 125% rules for 10 years.
What are the pros and cons
Is it worth when considering tax benefits or focus on shares and equities
I know this has been asked before but I've read and read and just can't decide what the best option is. Keen to hear everyone's thoughts on whether I should max out super first vs focus on ETFs outside of super first, vs a balance of both?
I guess my priority is to have the option to retire early at like 50-55 (ideally earlier although probably not possible), but just trying to work out the maths on how to split my money between super and ETFs.
28M, single, $87K gross salary excl. super
1 bed apartment PPOR with $255k on loan, variable
$65K in super
Only about $10K in cash and none in ETFs anymore
$30K in crypto that I'm not selling, but not adding to either (don't lecture me please haha)
Am probably able to save roughly 40% or so of my take home pay
I'm currently salary sacrificing $250 a month on top of the 12% my employer puts in.
My first priority is to save up like $20K-$30K in an offset as my emergency fund.
But after that I'm unsure how I should balance super vs ETFs vs offset.
I've read this and the one on how much to save inside vs outside super - https://passiveinvestingaustralia.com/offset-vs-etfs-vs-super/
but am still stuck with deciding on what to do - analysis paralysis to the max.
At the moment I'm leaning towards upping salary sacrifice to 20%, so like $580 a month? and then putting the rest into ETFs. Another option would be to either max out super or ETFs first rather than splitting between both at once. Or smash the mortgage.
But would love any thoughts from people who have been in my position before and what you did!
Thanks :)
We are approaching our retirement, slightly early and will have most of our income from super, most of which we can access soon. I want to keep money we currently have in ETFs to use as our travel /fun money, mostly leaving the capital alone and spending the dividends. What ETFs are the best for taking advantage of fully franked dividends (so we can get the franking credits back in retirement). We want some growth, but mostly the franked dividends.
Under the proposed minimum 30% tax on capital gains from 1/7/27 is there any concession for super contributions?
For example, other taxable income $45k, plus capital gain $20k, additional tax @ 30% = $6k (+Medicare). If you make a concessional super contribution of $20k, previously that would result in being taxed at 15% instead of the marginal tax rate of 30%. With the new system it sounds like you would not be able to claim a tax deduction on that $20k, essentially forcing a non-concessional contribution, or possibly only reduce your other taxable income which takes it from $45k to $25k which is already taxed at 15% (+Medicare).
Instead of looking for capital gains in a big home, what about looking for 3 apartments with decent yield.
Let’s say 3 apartments worth 500-550k each.
The yield on each is around 5.5-6%.
So 72K cash flow annually but only 2% growth capital gains per year.
THEN, live off that rental cash flow once it’s all paid off?
If you have a salary of 250k, it won’t take too long to pay off those units + rent?
IF desperate for cash 20 years down the track, sell one apartment off for 0 tax due to indexing changes?
We started our FI journey in my mid 30s after a decade of partying and traveling. I'm now in my mid 50s and can say that I've reached FI.
As background, we set modest goals for what FI might look like, as they were met we upped each goal and kept grinding.
We could have (should have!) stopped earlier and saved a lot of anxiety. It's only in the last month that I realized that my goal should have been lifestyle optionality rather than a fixed number target.
With this realization our decisions about work and expenditure are not based on fearing missing goals, but what feels right and the diminishing return on a nice NW by continuing the grind.
Strangely having this choice has inspired me to keep working but be emotionally disconnected from threats of downsizings, office politics and other BS.
You check NW and market performance regularly, it's also worthwhile taking stock of your emotional state on a regular basis.
Stay disciplined but be realistic of the personal cost you're paying.
I'm very supportive broadly of what they are getting at - especially around taking out speculation in the housing market (homes should be for living not necessarily investment). However I would like to see some sort of concession for working/middle class savers/investors (maybe an initial lower rate of tax on the first 20k a year of investment income, like we have for the income brackets). The UK has something like this already.
It seems people love to downvote my post from the other day when I was essentially pointing out people want to help others but don't have any consideration for working class/middle class savers and investors. Sure tax the rich and mega corps, but why hit the working and middle class savers and investors?
[removed]
So I'm looking for the best stock broker that will have the least fees. I aim to deposit around $1000 each month, which would qualify for me to get the free brokerage on CMC.
Currently I'm looking at CMC vs Webull as both offer cheap or virutally free brokerage, but have also heard good things about things like Stake
Also, should I be considering both purchasing and selling fees or just purchasing fees?
I have about 6 figures in VGS/VAS and had planned to hold for the long run and keep tipping in each month but now the CGT changes have kind of hurt my motivation a bit… should I pull everything out and commit to high yield ETFs instead? Logic being that dividends are taxed at the marginal rate (pretty sure). Any advice appreciated