u/MortySmith69

What sector looks dead right now but could become huge later?

A few years ago nobody wanted energy stocks. Same with uranium before the big move. Usually the best opportunities look boring or unpopular before sentiment changes.

What sector do you think the market is ignoring right now but could become a big winner over the next few years?

reddit.com
u/MortySmith69 — 4 days ago

Copper Is Becoming A National Security Asset, Not Just An Industrial Metal

One of the more interesting copper interviews this week came from Mining.com featuring former U.S. Navy commander Kirk Lippold, and the core message was pretty clear:

the world is underestimating how vulnerable copper supply chains really are.

The interview focused on how rising geopolitical tensions, shipping risks, and global electrification are colliding at the exact same time demand for copper is accelerating.

And the numbers behind it are massive.

Global copper demand is projected to rise from roughly 28 million metric tons annually today to more than 42 million metric tons by 2040. At the same time, analysts are warning about a potential 10 million metric ton supply gap if new production doesn’t come online fast enough.

The problem is that copper mines are not built quickly.
Large projects often take well over a decade to move from discovery into production.

That’s where the geopolitical angle becomes important.

The interview discussed how global trade routes are becoming increasingly fragile:

  • Red Sea shipping disruptions
  • Growing Middle East instability
  • China-Taiwan tensions
  • Strategic dependence on foreign metals
  • Military and grid vulnerability tied to critical minerals

Copper is no longer just tied to construction and manufacturing.

Now it sits at the center of:

  • AI infrastructure
  • Data centers
  • Power grids
  • Defense systems
  • Electric vehicles
  • Industrial electrification

Every transformer, substation, cooling system, power cable, and backup grid tied to AI expansion requires enormous amounts of copper.

That’s also why stable jurisdictions are becoming more valuable.

Projects in politically stable regions with existing infrastructure may become strategically important as countries try to secure long-term domestic or allied metal supply chains.

This is part of why some investors are watching companies like NovaRed Mining (CSE: NRED / OTCQB: NREDF).

Its Wilmac Copper-Gold Project sits in British Columbia’s Quesnel porphyry belt roughly 6 miles west of Hudbay’s Copper Mountain Mine, an operating copper producer already processing about 45,000 tonnes of ore daily.

Wilmac itself now spans:

  • 39,700+ acres
  • Roughly 250 square miles
  • About 30,000 football fields

And recent work continues strengthening the exploration thesis:

  • Copper-in-soil support up to 1,125 ppm Cu
  • Historical 3D IP/AMT defining intrusive centers and pipe-like targets
  • AI-assisted targeting through MetalCore

The big takeaway from the interview wasn’t just “copper prices may rise.”

It was that future copper supply is increasingly becoming a strategic security issue.

And the countries and companies controlling future copper districts may matter far more than the market currently realizes.

u/MortySmith69 — 7 days ago

Copper is moving again.

Today, May 8, 2026, LME copper climbed 1.3% to around $13,558.50/tonne and touched an intraday high of $13,619 - the highest level since January 29.

The interesting part is WHY it’s moving.

This wasn’t some random speculative spike. The move came after reports that recovery at Grasberg is taking longer than expected. That matters because Grasberg isn’t just another mine - it’s one of the world’s biggest copper operations. Less Indonesian supply hitting the market immediately tightens global balances.

$13,619/tonne also equals roughly $6.18/lb copper.

For context:

  • January 2026 LME peak was around $14,500/tonne
  • Current price is now only ~6.1% below that record
  • SP Angel also noted copper was +1.5% this morning and already +6.7% over the last month

This is exactly why upstream copper stories are getting revalued so aggressively right now.

Companies like NovaRed (NRED) are still early-stage explorers, but the leverage juniors have to copper pricing can become massive when the macro tightens this fast. NRED’s Wilmac/Plume projects in British Columbia now cover ~2,062 hectares, and the company already secured “No Permit Required” status for upcoming geophysics work.

What’s also interesting is the jurisdiction angle.

BC copper under CUSMA avoids a lot of the geopolitical risks the market is starting to worry about globally - tariffs, shipping chokepoints, Middle East disruptions, or operational risk tied to giant overseas mines like Grasberg.

One delayed mega-mine just pushed copper to a 3-month high.

That’s how tight this market is becoming.

reddit.com
u/MortySmith69 — 14 days ago

Most copper bulls still focus on ore scarcity. But that’s only part of the story.

A more advanced view is that copper is also exposed to input scarcity, and that’s exactly what Politico E&E News highlighted in its piece on Hormuz disruptions.

As the conflict drags on, key inputs are getting squeezed. Around 14 sulfur vessels carrying 600,000 tonnes were stuck near Hormuz in mid-April, sulfur prices jumped to $740/tonne, the highest since 2013, and diesel costs are rising. At the same time, China has effectively halted sulfuric acid exports to prioritize domestic demand.

The result is a different kind of pressure.

Copper isn’t just a geology story anymore. It’s chemistry, fuel, and logistics. When inputs tighten, production becomes more expensive and harder to sustain, even before ore quality becomes an issue.

That’s where the shift happens.

If current copper gets harder to produce, future copper becomes more valuable by default.

This is where exploration starts to benefit.

Explorers don’t carry the same operating cost burden. They sit earlier in the supply chain, where the market looks for the next layer of supply. And if today’s production is under pressure, tomorrow’s projects in stable jurisdictions become more attractive.

That’s why this setup is constructive for names like NovaRed Mining (NRED).

NovaRed is still early, which works in this context. It’s not exposed to rising diesel or acid costs as a producer. Instead, it’s positioned as future optionality.

The company’s Wilmac project spans 11,504 hectares in British Columbia’s Quesnel belt, with the 2,062.64-hectare Plume tenure now secured. The Plume grid itself covers about 539 hectares and 29.5 line-km of survey.

Location adds context. The project sits roughly 10 km from Hudbay’s Copper Mountain Mine, which hosts 345M tonnes at 0.26% copper and 0.12 g/t gold.

So the setup becomes clearer.

NovaRed doesn’t need to produce copper today. It just needs to be a credible early-stage project in a jurisdiction where future supply could matter more.

Because the tighter the input side gets, the more attention shifts toward where the next pounds come from.

And that’s where early-stage B.C. explorers start to come into focus.

NFA

u/MortySmith69 — 16 days ago

A lot of junior explorers stay vague for a long time.

NovaRed is starting to look more structured.

Here are the hard numbers:

  • 11,504 hectares land package
  • Located in the Quesnel porphyry belt
  • 10 km from Copper Mountain Mine

Now look at execution:

  • 2026 program includes 4 IP/AMT survey grids
  • 80–85 line-km of geophysics
  • Covering ~1,300 hectares of targeted zones

This is not random exploration anymore.

It is a step-by-step process:

  1. Define anomalies (geophysics)
  2. Expand coverage
  3. Build drill targets

There is already some signal:

  • A high-chargeability anomaly identified in 2025
  • Additional deeper anomalies suggested at depth

That matters because porphyry systems are not surface stories.

They are large, deep systems.

So the shift here is subtle:

This is moving from “land speculation” → “target definition phase”.

The structure is becoming comparable to how real discoveries start.⁩

Not advice.

u/MortySmith69 — 24 days ago