u/Mrdieselll

i heard human artists and models could be partecipating in the next seasons of the galactic grooming competition??

I thought humans hated their fur, which is why they shave it off themselves almost daily, i don't understand how there can be human artists in this field since they have so little fur around their bodies, concentrated mostly on the head.

And have they not thought about how terrifying would it be for our groomers to place their hands so close to the human model face and mouth, or for our models to be handled by humans with blades and dangerous tools so close to their vital organs and face, and on top of that, they'd have to not panic and remain perfectly still while they are being worked on???? Sounds like a traumatizing experience. I'm sure we're about to see match interruptions with people running away in tears or injuries caused by sudden panic movements.

We should file a petition to stop this and change the rules about predator partecipation in certain disciplines, regardless if it increases ratings and views. Our professional artist mental and physical health is at stake and it could also normalize humans touching us and "petting" us too much.

And personal opinion, what could humans even try to achieve in this competition? Do they seriously think they can win against Serber's colored spikes art and Slivyc's silver and glow in the dark fur lines styles? We have decades of experience of fashion and training on our side, if humans don't finish at last place or disqualified i'd be surprised.

I recently found this podcast and wondered if EA research is missing on key details that could diminish the effectiveness of cage free advocacy.

Essentially:

Cage free campaigns have been regarded by the EA community as a really effective and traceable way to reduce animal suffering, with tangible effects in their ability to shift the maket and consumer trends.

But many ill side effects don't seem to be recognized, in fact, we could have actually made the situation worse:

-the eggs industry saw the shift in consumer choiche and decided to capitalize on it instead of fighting against it: people now feel less guilty when buying cage free eggs and are willing to buy more eggs than before, thinking the chickens they are exploiting are much less mistreated. Egg production and consumption has grown at a faster rate than meat resulting in more total hen suffering, and now people are more unwilling to do better, because they feel like they are already helping enough when buying cage free. The egg industry knows this and is actively trying to use animal welfare as a marketing strategy to actually increase production and profits, using advertisements and campaigns of their own, without actually taking into account the suffering of the animals that are being exploited.

-health and welfare of hens may not increase that much, as many land raised hens are still farmed in very enclosed and crowded spaces, leading to more health problems and different kinds of stress. One could argue that it is still a better life than being stuck in a cage, but it might be not a big enough improvement to counter the side effects.

-non cage farming increases the risk of bird flu spreading and causing harm to both humans and hens, leading to entire livestocks having to be slaughtered when there is risk of contagion.

Cage free can directly decrease suffering of animals, but we have to be careful and research if all of this effort isn't actually being turned against us by who's trying to defend the market. Has there been actual research that take these side effects into consideration?

What is your opinion about it? Has this been discussed before? We should do more research on this and share it and also encourage counter arguments as much as we can to figure out how to be more effective.