Confused about a dupe on H1
I reported a vulnerability on H1 and it passed the first bot check, then after about 15 days an H1 analyst reached out and asked about further demonstration, we went back and forth and then he asked me to check if it still works on the latest version (this was for an opencore program and this version hadn't come out when I first reported the vuln, my report demonstrated the vuln on the latest version at that time), so I did so and sure enough the vuln still worked but in this new latest version they had tried to patch part of the primitive but failed to do so, so part of my argument for the vuln in the initial report was no longer true and I pointed that out and explained the change, the analyst told me he'll discuss it with the program team internally and get back to me, then a few days later it got marked as a duplicate, this was confusing to me because I assumed if an H1 analyst validated the bug it's just a question of severity then, I don't understand how they couldn't tell whether or not it was previously reported, the bug could have been reported in the initial version as my report before I did, which lead to the patch while my report wasn't triaged yet but then you'd expect mine to be marked as a duplicate immediately, it might be possible that it has been reported on both versions separately before my report was triaged and the dupe refers to the first version but then why would I be asked to see if it applies to the latest version as well? I'm just really confused by this whole ordeal, and of course they won't add me to the original report, is there anything I can do here?