Brokerage Compliance Catch-22 for Perpetual Travelers: Schwab vs. IBKR?
Hi everyone,
My husband and I are retiring in 2027 and transitioning to a "perpetual tourist" / slow travel lifestyle (e.g., 6 months in Thailand, 3 months in Vietnam, 4 months in Colombia, etc.). We don't plan on establishing permanent tax residency in any single foreign country, nor do we plan on living in the US again.
I am a strict rule-follower, but I feel like I am stuck in a massive compliance Catch-22 regarding where to hold our portfolio (ETFs, Treasury bonds, Roth IRA) to avoid KYC/AML account freezes.
The Comparison I'm Weighing:
Option 1: The Schwab International Route. I want to be 100% legal. However, Schwab International requires proof of a foreign residence (utility bill/lease) to open/convert the account. Because we are slow traveling in Airbnbs, I won't have these documents.
Option 2: The Interactive Brokers (IBKR) Route. Many say IBKR is the "gold standard" for nomads because they handle multi-currency better and are more tolerant of expats. However, I’ve heard their KYC for people with no fixed address can still be brutal.
Option 3: The Domestic "Base" Route. Using a mail-forwarding service (like South Dakota or Florida) to maintain a U.S. domicile and telling a domestic brokerage I'm "traveling indefinitely." Does this actually work for 20 years, or is it a ticking "tax bomb" if they decide to force-liquidate the account?
My questions for fellow slow-travelers:
If you use IBKR vs. Schwab International, which one was easier to set up and maintain without a long-term foreign lease?
For those using IBKR, how did you satisfy the "residential address" requirement if you were moving between Airbnbs every 3-6 months?
Is there a specific "nomad-friendly" way to bridge the gap between a domestic US account and an international one while in transit?
Thanks in advance for the technical insights!