u/No-Reference1385

I'm building a lead gen workflow in n8n that produces hundreds of leads, and I'm not sure how people handle the review part.

Ideally I want to:

• quickly label leads good/bad
• tell it why something is bad, so it stops making the same mistake
• gradually automate the obvious ones and only review weird cases

For example, if I reject 10 agencies, I'd rather just say "no agencies from now on" than keep rejecting them.

How do you guys do this in practice? Airtable/Sheets? A separate UI? Do you update the n8n workflow itself when your criteria change?

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

[removed]

Applying to YC (and got rejected) made me realize that we all need more real founder friends.

I'm wondering if anyone applying to F26 (or planning to apply to a future batch) would be interested in forming a small group where we actually help each other.

It has to be an operating exchange around early customers (Proposed by @Sad-Slide9083 in the comment).

It would be something like:

• Founderse grouped by ICP, channel, or stage, not just YC batch
• each week, everyone posts one target customer segment, one distribution experiment, and one specific intro ask
• product feedback has to include screenshots or exact user-flow notes, not just encouragement
• keep a shared ledger of who is trying to reach which buyer and what messaging was tested

I'm currently building something around lead generation and customer discovery, so I'm happy to help first by finding potential early users for anyone in the group.

Not trying to sell anything. I just want to make more friends which I believe is critical for founders.

I recently started posting on X, and honestly it feels like shouting into the void.

I'm trying to figure out what actually works for people who have managed to build an audience.

Do you:

• Schedule posts and just stay consistent?
• Spend time every day replying to other people's posts?
• DM people?
• Or is there something else that made the biggest difference?

Specifically, I'm wondering whether it's worth blocking out 30–60 minutes every day just to find relevant posts and leave thoughtful replies.

I recently started posting on X, and honestly it feels like shouting into the void.

I'm trying to figure out what actually works for people who have managed to build an audience.

Do you:

• Schedule posts and just stay consistent?
• Spend time every day replying to other people's posts?
• DM people?
• Or is there something else that made the biggest difference?

Specifically, I'm wondering whether it's worth blocking out 30–60 minutes every day just to find relevant posts and leave thoughtful replies.

I recently started posting on X, and honestly it feels like shouting into the void.

I'm trying to figure out what actually works for people who have managed to build an audience.

Do you:

• Schedule posts and just stay consistent?
• Spend time every day replying to other people's posts?
• DM people?
• Or is there something else that made the biggest difference?

Specifically, I'm wondering whether it's worth blocking out 30–60 minutes every day just to find relevant posts and leave thoughtful replies.

I have spent the past few months building products and thinking about growth.

Now I realized founder connections are WAY more important than another week polishing features.

So I'd like to meet more builders.

If you are working on something and struggling to find early users. I'd be happy to be your first user and manually research public conversations to identify first 10 users for you.

No charge. No sales pitch.

I have spent the past few months building products and thinking about growth.

Now I realized founder connections are WAY more important than another week polishing features.

So I'd like to meet more builders.

If you are working on something and struggling to find early users. I'd be happy to be your first user and manually research public conversations to identify first 10 users for you.

No charge. No sales pitch.

If you are interested, leave a comment.

Claudecode lover here. I analyzed 9,222 X users discussing AI coding tools. It seems that:
1. Over the past 25 days, Codex was the #1 named destination for churn-intent developers. Among users who said they were leaving a tool and named where they were going, Codex got 400 devs — about 30% of all named migrations. Despite people have polarized view about Sam Altman.

2. Price cutting not as effective as I expected. Anthropic raising Claude Code limits by +50% didn’t stop limit complaints. The top gripe was still “limits too low” at 38%. But when Opus 4.8 landed in Claude Code, the reaction was much stronger: 50% impressed by quality, +47 net switching intent.

I guess eventually it all comes down to the model itself. Looking forward to Mythos then!

https://preview.redd.it/iro81t43776h1.png?width=859&format=png&auto=webp&s=b9a8ea462237af208aa417a4aa7caec4b342b5fd

https://preview.redd.it/hsrquo15776h1.png?width=848&format=png&auto=webp&s=2e703295b466856320c4638547b773aa71bc77fd

https://preview.redd.it/c8fqtfy5776h1.png?width=1787&format=png&auto=webp&s=5d0ee507c6b49801996a80585de32d1c9f7edca7

https://preview.redd.it/aj04aik6776h1.png?width=1800&format=png&auto=webp&s=2886075887c7a250d373b7dc2fe41c6c8908164d

I analyzed 9,222 X users discussing AI coding tools. It seems that:
1. Over the past 25 days, Codex was the #1 named destination for churn-intent developers. Among users who said they were leaving a tool and named where they were going, Codex got 400 devs — about 30% of all named migrations.

2. Price cutting not as effective as I expected. For example, Anthropic raising Claude Code limits by +50% didn’t stop limit complaints. The top gripe was still “limits too low” at 38%. But when Opus 4.8 landed in Claude Code, the reaction was much stronger: 50% impressed by quality, +47 net switching intent.

I guess eventually it all comes down to the model itself. Hope GPT 5.6 will be great!

https://preview.redd.it/6hdvbw2i876h1.png?width=859&format=png&auto=webp&s=69e8a680ae73282655c796a9c9656d73a2b079b2

https://preview.redd.it/tmadnvak876h1.png?width=1787&format=png&auto=webp&s=6f31fc1272524cfc5ae91175b717f0bc7a2397e2

https://preview.redd.it/d9l34o1l876h1.png?width=1800&format=png&auto=webp&s=8daf9ecd10533e548ca3f992adceeb7d7fed088b

Founder here

I built a rough timeline for tracking AI progress:

https://earthonlines.com/timeline/ai

The idea is to show what changed, why it’s new, why it matters, and the sources.

Would this be useful enough to check daily, or is it just another news feed?

Brutal feedback welcome.

I built a rough AI progress timeline.

Idea: instead of following scattered X posts, newsletters, and repeated news, AI updates are organized as:

1. What changed

2. Why it’s new

3. Why it matters

Demo: https://earthonlines.com/timeline/ai

Would you check something like this daily?

Brutal feedback welcome.

I built a rough first version of EarthOnline.

My thesis is simple:

In the AI era, output becomes cheap. Input becomes the bottleneck.

I don’t want endless feeds.
I want the world compressed into living timelines.

Rough demo: earthonlines.com

Roast it.