u/No_Championship7751

AI drafts might be the fastest-acting anchor bias has ever had

AI drafts might be the fastest-acting anchor bias has ever had

Anchoring used to need a wheel of fortune and a made-up number (Tversky & Kahneman's classic experiment). Now it just needs an AI-generated first draft that nobody admits to using.

Picture the meeting: someone presents a tidy three-part framework as "here's what I've been thinking," everyone nods, feedback is positive. Except the framing, the assumptions, the argument structure were all decided by a model before the human touched the keyboard. What the human actually did was edit - and under-adjust from the anchor, same as we all reliably do.

The interesting part isn't that this happens. It's what it does to credit. The senior person "refining" a draft used to be doing real framing work; the junior person with the fastest prompting fingers can now produce the anchor everyone else adjusts around. Nobody in the room would call that a power transfer - it gets filed under "efficient collaboration." And credit for original thinking still flows to whoever typed the final version, even though the actual frame-setting happened upstream and invisibly.

I wrote a longer piece pulling this apart (self-assessments, performance reviews, and the "who actually wrote this" problem) if anyone wants to dig in further: https://medium.com/@nudgeintended/the-anchor-nobody-named-423b4931522d

Curious whether others here have seen this play out - the anchor shifting from "whoever's senior" to "whoever prompts fastest."

u/No_Championship7751 — 14 days ago

Curious how companies actually structure "unlimited" PTO in practice — does it work?

I'm researching how behavioral economics shows up in workplace policy, and unlimited PTO keeps coming up as a weird case: several data points suggest employees on unlimited plans actually take fewer days off on average than employees with a fixed allowance.

For managers whose companies use unlimited PTO: does it actually lead to people taking less time off in practice? Do you find yourself having to explicitly tell your team to take a certain number of days, or model it yourself to get people to actually use it? And if your company switched from a fixed policy to unlimited, did you notice any change in behavior?

Trying to understand the gap between the intent of these policies and what actually happens on teams.

reddit.com
u/No_Championship7751 — 30 days ago

The Unlimited PTO Paradox: why removing a number backfires

Data on unlimited PTO is in: employees on unlimited plans average around 13 days off a year, versus 15 for employees with a fixed allowance, and about a quarter take no PTO at all. It looks like a straightforward default problem. A fixed number of days does two jobs at once: it signals what's normal, and its expiration forces action. Remove the number and both signals disappear, so most people default to taking less rather than more.

It's basically the inverse of the retirement-savings default problem: instead of auto-enrolling people into a good default, unlimited PTO auto-enrolls them into no default at all. I wrote up the fuller breakdown, including how some companies are now reintroducing structure to fix it: https://medium.com/nudge-intended/the-unlimited-pto-paradox-8010c2bcabf9

u/No_Championship7751 — 30 days ago