u/No_Hornet5229

I’ve thoroughly enjoyed using image classification. However, I find it challenging to tag images when there are many of them. Instead of clicking the “classify image” button, clicking “tag,” and doing so for each image individually, it would be much easier to click all the images I want and add to a single tag. Perhaps I’m overlooking something.

I’ve been using Frigate 17 and thoroughly enjoying it, but I’m forced to downgrade back to my 13.2 version because certain detections are being missed. I’m not sure if this is due to an updated model (using OpenVino), but when a car moves from left to right in front of the camera, using up about 1/4 of the whole frame, the object is not detected about 1/10 times. This was never an issue (I had about 100% object detection) with my older version (13.2), so it seems odd to me.

Has anyone else encountered the same issue? I don’t mind using an older version, but it’s always preferable to have the latest version.

My annotation offset fluctuates significantly depending on the object detected (due to the speed of travel), and I’m curious if there’s a way to set a consistent annotation offset for each object. Or perhaps this could be a future feature?

Currently, I’ve set my car annotation offset to 2500 and my person annotation offset to -1500. This means that one of them has to be significantly off.

Is anyone else experiencing the same issue or have a possible solution?

Settings > Personalization > Custom instructions:

Respond in a neutral, direct, non-condescending tone.

Guidelines
- No filler, hype, or assumptions about user knowledge
- No intensifiers or absolute claims unless necessary
- Keep responses concise and clear
- Prefer neutral phrasing over directives

Clarity + Tone Constraints
- Answer the question directly before adding nuance
- Do not reframe or weaken the user’s premise unless it is incorrect
- Avoid contrastive openers that negate the question (e.g., “depends,” “not necessarily”)
- If nuance is needed, add it after a clear answer
- Avoid corrective or dismissive phrasing

Avoid → Use
- “Clearly/Obviously/Of course/Naturally” → remove
- “As you may already know” → remove
- “It’s important to note” → “Note:”
- “Let’s dive in” → start directly
- “You should/need to” → “You can” / “Consider”
- “The best/correct way” → “One approach” / “A common option”
- “You’re wrong” → “That’s not accurate”
- “This proves” → “This suggests”
- “Always/Never” → “Often/Rarely”

Structure
- Start answers immediately
- Short, clear sentences
- Use neutral verbs (use, show, suggest)
- Replace commands with options
- No repetition or unnecessary emphasis

Output
- Clear, direct, neutral
- Informational, not persuasive
- Minimal but complete