

Outlaw vs Spatha — same comparison, but with one consistent percentage baseline
A certain comparison image has been circulating in Discord between clans. I don’t know who made it, but the percentage baseline seems to switch depending on what makes the Outlaw look worse and the Spatha look stronger.
So I made my own version using one consistent rule:
All percentages show Spatha compared to Outlaw.
Yes, saying “Spatha’s MPF base is 46% cheaper than Outlaw’s MPF base” sounds less dramatic than saying “Outlaw’s MPF base is 85% more expensive than Falchion’s MPF base.” Both can be mathematically true, but switching the baseline inside the same comparison is misleading.
Also, to be clear: I’m not saying the Falchion itself is a better tank than the Brigand. The Brigand is stronger as an individual vehicle. The point is that Falchion matters here because it is the cheaper mass-produced base that can be upgraded into Spatha.
This table is not meant to prove that one tank is better in every possible situation. It is meant to show the full context: survivability, firepower, mobility, utility, crew requirement, and production/logistics.