u/NumiSullivan

AI agents can already function as an entire virtual dev team. This is real, what do you think?

Guys, don’t fixate on the fact that I’m a woman, there are developers among us too, I assume that’s obvious... Been going down a bit of a rabbit hole the last couple months on this whole virtual AI team thing. The pitch is basically that you don't hand a task to one all-purpose agent, you split it across roles instead. One does the planning, one writes the backend, another reviews it, and so on.

I'll be honest, I rolled my eyes at first. Looked like just another skin on top of Cursor or Claude Code. But it actually seems to work like a pipelines with defined roles, approval steps, and context getting passed from one stage to the next instead of one agent trying to keep everything in its head at once.

I’ve looked at a few setups (bridgeapp, replit, emergent), as far as I understand it, is that the team lives inside each project. Architect, backend, frontend, QA, whatever roles you need. And the interesting bit is each agent can run a different model. Backend on Claude Code, frontend on Codex, whatever works. Apparently even someone who doesn't code can just pick the model their agent uses.

Anyway, has anyone here actually run something like this on real work? Not the demo stuff, real backlog, real mess. I keep going back and forth on whether it's worth setting up or if it just adds overhead. Kind of feel like a year or two from now nobody's gonna care which single agent is best, it'll be about whose whole team of them actually plays well together. Would genuinely like to hear from people who've tried it.

reddit.com
u/NumiSullivan — 17 hours ago