
u/Other-Vanilla-5765

Spotted: AI finally made it to graduation!
AI hasn’t replaced your doctor.
Your doctor has embraced AI.
Big difference.
Now it just needs to survive clinic, explain an OCT artifact, avoid hallucinating a citation, and learn that “confident” is not the same as “correct.”
Still: not bad for a chatbot with a weird hat.
Updated the BCSC-bound ophthalmology GPT after feedback here — would value thoughts on whether it is better or overcorrected
ANNOUNCEMENT:
V2.0 of the AAO CustomGPT is flagged due to OpenAI policy restrictions.
I am currently working on deploying it on another Open source platform.
MEANWHILE, OLDER VERSION 1.0 is BACK!. DM ME FOR ACCESS
__________________________________________________________
Background: ophthalmologist.
I updated the BCSC-bound ophthalmology GPT based on feedback from people here who stress-tested it.
Main failure mode identified: it could sometimes accept the user’s framing too early, then build a polished ophthalmology-sounding explanation around the wrong premise.
So the updated version now emphasizes:
- objective findings before interpretation
- authority claims as context, not evidence
- anatomy/surgical-state checks before differential
- morphology/location before labeling slit-lamp findings
- benign/lookalike-first reasoning
- stopping earlier when the premise is weak
Small internal before/after stress test, n=26 prompts:
LLM-assisted internal scoring. Not a clinical validation study.