

Stop giving property tax breaks to senior citizens
From a classical liberal perspective, taxation should be neutral, limited, and applied as equally as possible under the law. A free society functions best when government avoids creating broad categories of protected groups who are permanently shielded from obligations that other citizens are required to bear. While targeted relief may be appropriate in cases of genuine financial hardship, the principle should remain that all property owners contribute fairly to the local services and institutions from which they benefit.
Today, the median age of homeownership continues to rise, while younger generations face higher housing costs, greater debt burdens, and delayed entry into the housing market. Yet many property tax systems place disproportionate burdens on newer homeowners and working families because large categories of property owners receive exemptions based primarily on age or status rather than financial need. This creates a system in which the tax burden is increasingly concentrated on a smaller portion of the population.
Classical liberalism emphasizes equality before the law and skepticism toward systems of privilege, even when those privileges are politically popular. Broad exemptions for seniors or veterans, regardless of income or wealth, can distort fairness by shifting the responsibility of funding local government onto younger citizens and families who may already be economically strained. A wealthy retiree living in a highly appreciated home may ultimately contribute less than a younger family that recently purchased a modest home at modern market prices.
A fairer and more liberal approach would avoid broad categorical exemptions in favor of narrowly tailored relief based on genuine financial hardship. If a person truly cannot afford rising property taxes, temporary assistance or tax deferrals may be justified. However, exemptions should not become permanent privileges disconnected from economic reality. In a society committed to equal treatment under the law, the responsibility to support local infrastructure, schools, emergency services, and community institutions should be shared as broadly and evenly as possible.
The Iran War Could Be a $300 Billion Shock — Driving Up Mortgage Rates and Squeezing Wages
cato.orgHarriet Martineau
I do not trust the government to determine truth, but I also do not trust crowds to remain rational without a culture of liberty, responsibility, and open inquiry.
The answer to falsehood is not authoritarian control of speech; the answer to authoritarianism is not abandoning truth.
The Effects of Immigration on Labor Markets
"Economic theory tells us that immigration directly benefits economies for the same reason and in the same manner that trade does: it allows labor to work where it is most productive, making all other factors of production more productive. The government is no better at centrally planning labor markets than it is other markets: by incorporating dispersed, tacit knowledge, wages coordinate the choices of immigrants and their employers in myriad ways that no one could foresee. Moreover, immigration has a big positive effect on productivity that trade does not have: it gives workers everywhere access to the most advanced technology."
Public Trust in Government: 1958-2025
Public trust in government has declined dramatically over the last several decades. From a classical liberal perspective, is declining trust primarily a healthy skepticism of concentrated power, or does it represent a dangerous weakening of the institutions necessary to preserve liberty and lawful order?