u/PrestigiousBet9499

It's not just a visibility tool.

It's a full system —
from measuring your AI presence
to actually improving it.

https://geotrackerai.com

Been building in the AI-search-visibility space and noticed every tool (mine included, early on) converged on the same thing: a dashboard that shows your Share of Voice and which sources AI cites instead of you.

But that's the easy 80%. The part that actually moves the needle is judgment a chart can't encode: which gap to close first, whether a cited Reddit thread is still live or archived and useless, whether last week's fix actually changed anything or the number just wobbled.

My takeaway after a lot of these: the measurement is a commodity, the decision-making isn't. Curious how others here handle the "okay, the tool flagged it — now what?" gap.

(Full disclosure: I run one of these tools and wrote up my take here — happy to talk shop either way: https://geotrackerai.com/blog/working-relationship-not-a-subscription)

Google announced new "Search Generative AI performance reports" on

June 3, 2026 — first time Search Console exposes AI Overviews and

AI Mode impressions to publishers as a dedicated report.

Source: https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2026/06/gen-ai-performance-reports

What's in it per Google's own writeup:

- Impressions only

- Breakdown by page, country, device, date (hourly to monthly)

- Covers AI Overviews, AI Mode, and Discover AI features

What's NOT in it (yet):

- Click data

- CTR

- Query-level breakdown

Google describes the rollout as "a subset of websites" with no

timeline for general availability. Mine isn't in the subset yet

(checked today, June 14 — still seeing only the standard Performance

report).

A few honest questions for the community:

1. Has anyone here had it enabled? When did it land for you?

2. If yes — what does the UI actually look like? A new top-level

   report in the left nav, a "Search appearance" filter inside the

   existing Performance view, or somewhere else?

3. For sites that already have it: do the impression numbers feel

   directionally sane vs. what your AI visibility tracker is showing?

Asking because the moment GSC starts exposing first-party AI data

is a meaningful calibration milestone for anyone tracking AI search

visibility — but only if the data behaves predictably. Curious what

early-access folks are actually seeing.

Hey r/GEO_optimization ,

Wrote up why I think SEO + GEO share ~60% of technical fundamentals (sitemap, schema, robots, crawlable HTML) but diverge sharply on signals AI engines actually weight — Reddit/forum citation density, freshness, expertise diversity.

Built a community to figure this out faster than I could alone. 22 threads already, 6 categories. Mostly Reddit-research-driven — same kind of questions you're already asking here, but tactical receipts.

Honest about WHY I'm building it (it serves users AND me — better roadmap, founder authority, long-term moat that funded competitors can't fast-forward).

https://geotrackerai.com/blog/why-we-built-an-ai-search-community-2026-05

Pushback welcome. Especially on the "Reddit weighs more in Perplexity than ChatGPT" claim — if your data says otherwise I want to hear it.

After X months building a tool that scans how AI search engines cite SaaS brands,

I noticed one thing: 90% of the technical work to be eligible for citation in

ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode is free if you know what you're doing —

and most teams pay agencies or just skip it.

So I shipped a free toolkit today. Browser-side, no signup, no email gate:

▸ llms.txt generator — pick a site type, fill 5 fields, copy the file

▸ robots.txt builder for 18 AI crawlers — three stances (allow all / block

  training only / block all) — most teams accidentally block citation bots

  thinking they're blocking training bots

▸ JSON-LD generator — Organization / SoftwareApp / Article / FAQPage with

  one-click Rich Results Test validation

▸ Free 60-second AI audit at /grader — get a Share of Voice baseline before

  doing any of the above

Plus 8 long-form guides covering each tool + 3 per-engine playbooks (ChatGPT,

Perplexity, Google AI Mode) + Reddit citation strategy + measurement.

Why free: the technical-hygiene part is a 60-second-to-5-minute exercise per

signal. Gating that would be gross. Our paid product (GEO Tracker AI) is for

the measurement layer — Share of Voice tracking across engines, 14-day

Outcome Loop, action drafts — the stuff a static file can't do.

Everything in one place:

🔧 Tools: geotrackerai.com/tools

📖 Guides: geotrackerai.com/guides

📊 Free audit: geotrackerai.com/grader

The pillar walk-through with the honest math on what each step delivers:

geotrackerai.com/blog/ai-search-visibility-hygiene-2026

If you've shipped any of these and want a sanity check — happy to take a look.

DMs open.

#AIsearch #GEO #AEO #SEO #buildinpublic

Your company may have strong SEO and still be invisible in AI answers.

I want to test this publicly.

Over the next 7 days, I’ll run an AI visibility stress test for 30 B2B SaaS websites.

Not brand queries.

Real buyer-intent questions like:

“best tool for [use case]”

“alternatives to [known competitor]”

“how to choose [category] software”

“which platform should a small team use for [problem]”

For each company, I’ll check whether ChatGPT and Perplexity can:

recognize the brand

place it in the right category

mention it when the buyer does not know the brand name

describe it accurately

surface competitors instead

This is not a “gotcha” list.

AI answers are unstable. Results depend on engine, query wording, available sources and timing.

But that is exactly the point.

Most companies are still checking Google rankings while buyers are starting their research inside AI systems.

If you want your SaaS included, comment with:

domain + category

I’ll pick 30 from B2B SaaS, AI tools, devtools, analytics and cybersecurity.

I’ll publish the patterns next week.

My prediction:

Some companies with weak SEO will show up surprisingly well.

And some companies with polished websites will be almost invisible.