u/Prize_Point_6261

I am a teacher and have been thinking about how much harder it is to judge individual contribution when students are collaborating digitally and using AI. I have been developing an AI-assisted, educator-facing tool that looks at contribution history in shared Google Docs and gives the teacher additional evidence to work with. I would be interested to hear how others are approaching this problem. If anyone wants to test what I have built, feel free to DM me.

I am a high school business teacher and built Collaboration Tracker after getting frustrated with trying to figure out who actually did what in shared Google Docs. It turns the document activity into a clearer breakdown of individual contributions. I am curious whether adjuncts who assign group work would find something like this useful. What would you need it to show for it to actually help with grading or feedback? Happy to share it if anyone wants to test it.

Hi all! I'm a high school teacher, and I built a tool that tracks individual contributions in group work, so teachers have real visibility into who did what instead of just guessing when it's grading time. I want to hear it from the other side: as a student, does something like this sound fair and helpful (finally, credit for people who actually do the work), or does it feel like surveillance / another way to get in trouble? Genuinely want the unfiltered take, good or bad. If you've been in a group project where one person did everything and everyone got the same grade or the opposite, where you did the work and got lumped in with people who didn't I'd love to hear about it too.