r/chrome_extensions

▲ 4 r/chrome_extensions+1 crossposts

Could such an extension be beneficial in language learning? (TL)

Would it be beneficial or harmful for language learning? I would appreciate it if you shared your opinions.

u/No-Drama3983 — 6 hours ago

Kinda miss the time when this sub talk about what framework to use, the downfall of crxjs, the stagnation of plasmo, the rise of wxt

Now, everyone is just an expert in building extensions lol

reddit.com
u/Adibzter — 8 hours ago
▲ 7 r/chrome_extensions+3 crossposts

I built a 100% local-first RSS reader that turns Chrome's New Tab page into a feed dashboard (with built-in AI summaries)

https://preview.redd.it/gwm8zturjlih1.png?width=1100&format=png&auto=webp&s=bd8c5d489faee387966a7507238f0df0739f0a1a

Huminn turns Chrome's New Tab into a clean, 100% local-first RSS dashboard. I built it to follow feeds privately without accounts or tracking, plus instant in-browser AI summaries.

I'd really appreciate your feedback! How do you currently organize your daily reading list, and what would you like to see added to Huminn?

reddit.com
u/GuillermoGoni — 10 hours ago

10 months free = $0. Added a $4.99 tier on day 295: first sale in 19 days, $574.39 in two months

A year ago today I uploaded my first extension — ChatGPT Pro Tools — to the Chrome Web Store, and then spent ten months not asking anyone for money. It launched with one tiny feature: pinning chats in ChatGPT. Funny detail: five months later that exact feature shipped natively in ChatGPT itself, so I deleted my own launch feature and kept going.

On day 295 I finally added a $4.99/month tier. Nineteen days later a stranger paid — and that first customer is still subscribed.
Year one in honest numbers:
• $574.39 collected in two months of charging, $209.65 MRR
• 44 active subscribers
• 2,144 installs currently enabled, 4.7 rating
• 47 Google clicks to my site in the first three months → 862 in the last 28 days
• $0 spent on ads

The biggest lesson was about reading the stats page, and the first screenshot shows why. In July the weekly-users graph climbed toward 16,000 and I honestly thought I’d caught a trend — I refreshed that chart like a slot machine. Then over two days the public counter settled from 10,000+ down to 2,000+, and when I decomposed the data, the whole spike was auto-update pulses re-counting dormant installs. The tell was in the second screenshot: installs per day didn’t react at all — no matching spike, just the same gradual climb as the months before. The real, boring number: 2,144 people who actually keep it enabled. So now I treat weekly-users as a mood ring and judge everything by installs, uninstalls and the enabled count.

What actually brought users in surprised me. Early on I generated a dozen long-tail blog articles — one prompt each, honestly — hit publish and forgot they existed. Months later I opened Search Console and realized nearly all of my traffic was landing on exactly those forgotten pages. That’s the third screenshot. One-prompt articles had been quietly carrying the whole funnel. Plan for year two: write them properly this time — because if the throwaway versions rank, better ones should rank higher.

One question for anyone further along: if you were in my position right now, what would you do on the marketing side?

u/Comfortable_Tax8808 — 7 hours ago

I wish this extension existed. I would genuinely pay for it.

I have an extension idea that I really wish already existed.

I do not have the time to build it myself, so I am basically putting the idea out there in case someone who does have the time finds it interesting enough to build. I would genuinely use it, and honestly I would be willing to pay for it.

The idea is a coding agent inside VS Code, similar to Codex, but instead of using an API as its main model, it uses the AI websites you already have access to.

For example, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or basically any AI platform that has a web chat.

It would probably work through two extensions.

A VS Code extension that contains the actual coding agent, and a Chrome extension that communicates with the AI website.

You prompt the agent from VS Code. The agent gathers the relevant code, files, errors, terminal output, project context, and whatever else the model needs.

That information gets sent to the Chrome extension.

The Chrome extension then sends it to ChatGPT or Claude through the website you are already logged into, gets the model's response, and sends that response back to the VS Code agent.

Then the VS Code agent actually performs the actions. It edits files, runs commands, reads the results, gathers the next piece of context, asks the model again, and continues the loop.

Basically:

VS Code coding agent → Chrome extension → ChatGPT or Claude in the browser → response back to VS Code → agent continues working

The browser is basically being used as the model provider.

The reason I want this is because I already pay for AI subscriptions. I would love to have something like a proper coding agent that can use those subscriptions instead of requiring API credits or another coding agent subscription on top of everything else.

And yes, I know automating web chats is probably annoying. Websites change, context limits need to be handled, responses need to be parsed, the browser extension and VS Code extension need to communicate, etc.

But the idea itself seems completely doable.

I searched for something that works like this and could not really find it.

So I am posting this less as "here is something I am building" and more as "please, someone build this because I want to use it" lol.

If someone made a solid version of this, I would happily pay for it.

And if something like this already exists, please tell me what it is.

reddit.com
u/FIRST_TIMER_BWSC — 16 hours ago

Advice from people who have monetized Chrome extensions

I recently shipped a Chrome extension for free on the Chrome Web Store, and I'm honestly surprised by the growth so far. I kept it completely free because my main goal was to get users and see whether people actually found it useful. Now I'm seeing around 1.2K weekly users, with a pretty sharp growth curve over the last couple of weeks. The screenshot is from the Chrome Web Store analytics. Now I'm wondering, is there a good way to start earning from the extension without hurting user growth? I don't want to put the core functionality behind a paywall, bombard users with ads, or do anything that makes people uninstall it. I'm considering optional premium features, a one-time payment for advanced features, donations/support, sponsorships, or maybe a Pro version while keeping the core extension free. For people who have actually built and monetized Chrome extensions, what worked for you? I would especially like to hear about models that allowed you to monetize while keeping the free user base growing. Would really appreciate some practical advice from developers who have been through this.

u/New_Interaction4011 — 14 hours ago
▲ 35 r/chrome_extensions+15 crossposts

Prepare for your ProductHunt launch ahead of time

Hi all,

As i'm working on growing launchpact.io i'm seeing a lot of unprepped launches and as the day unfold they don't get much visibility and end up with a failed launch.

This is one of the reasons i build launchpact.io, if you have an upcoming launch do check it out and prep ahead of time, i also added this checklist that can give some hints too, have a read.

Good luck everyone!

u/Competitive_Tune_590 — 19 hours ago
▲ 43 r/chrome_extensions+10 crossposts

I built an open-source Chrome extension that automatically redacts sensitive information from screenshots

I kept running into the same problem: screenshots often contain information you didn't realize you were sharing.

An API key. An email address. A phone number. A password field. Customer information.

Usually, you take the screenshot first and then manually look for things to hide.

I built Blackbar to reverse that workflow.

It reads the page before capturing it and automatically detects and redacts sensitive-looking information. The screenshot you get is already the safer version.

The part I cared most about was privacy.

Blackbar runs entirely on the device. It declares connect-src 'none', so Chrome itself blocks the extension from making network connections. It still works with Wi-Fi turned off.

It's also open source, has no account requirement, and is free.

I'd genuinely like feedback from other Chrome extension users/builders, especially on:

  • detection accuracy
  • false positives/negatives
  • the capture workflow
  • anything that would make you hesitate to trust it

Chrome Web Store Link

Source

u/Competitive-Dog9415 — 1 day ago

Need a reliable browser automation tool for multi tab

i have no experience in automation

I am trying to automate a repetitive daily task that requires moving data across multiple tabs in Google Chrome.

Like: Open a local file from the Windows downloads folder.

Copy a question from that file and paste it into ChatGPT

Copy the generated answer from ChatGPT

Switch to an open Canva project tab

Select the existing placeholder text box and overwrite it with the new answer.

Click the Next Page in Canva and repeat the entire loop.

reddit.com
u/No-Spirit-9610 — 20 hours ago

Crossed $1,000 gross with my first extension. How do I get from $1k to $10k?

I've been following this community since before I launched and got a lot of inspiration from the milestone posts here, so here's mine, plus a question.

The extension is called Bulk Edit, Delete & Download Google Photos. Google Photos has no bulk editing, so everything is one photo at a time. Batch lets you select photos (or a date range, or an album) and enhance, filter, crop, caption, watermark, convert, delete, or download all of them in one run.

Launched publicly about 3 months ago. This week I crossed $1,000 gross revenue and $500 MRR. Screenshot attached.

What's gotten me here so far: the Chrome Web Store listing is my biggest organic channel by far, translating it into 9 languages helped, and answering questions in forums works way better than announcing.

Now the real question: for those of you who've gone past this point, what actually moved you from $1k to $10k? More features, more SEO content, YouTube, partnerships, raising prices? I have a free tier with a monthly quota and paid tiers at $6.99 and $24.99.

Happy to answer anything about the CWS review process or how the automation works in return.

u/Some-Ad5503 — 1 day ago
▲ 6 r/chrome_extensions+1 crossposts

Columnary, a better experience for reading long articles

It bothered me that despite all the space on my laptop screen or desktop monitor, reading web articles felt like breathing through a straw. Horizontal space is poorly used and vertical space is in short supply, leaving only a few paragraphs on screen at once.

So I made Columnary, a Chrome extension that makes full use of your screen real estate, whether it's a small screen laptop or a 5K monitor. It strips ads and formatting, and puts everything into columns in a horizontally scrolling format. This way, articles can fill 100% of your screen while keeping line lengths readable.

This transforms the way your brain processes articles. When you can see the whole thing at once, you can utilise your natural spatial processing ability to make sense of where you are.

Columnary also includes a bookmark feature so you can mark your place when stepping away from long articles, and various typography settings and a full screen mode, as well as keyboard shortcuts to help you scroll by column.

Install Columnary extension · Source code

u/exclipy — 22 hours ago
▲ 22 r/chrome_extensions+8 crossposts

I got tired of having 50 tabs open just because I might need them someday — so I built this

I kept doing this thing where I'd find something I wanted to deal with later — an article, a product restock, a ticket sale, a deadline, some documentation, whatever — and I'd leave the tab open.

Then 3 days later I'd have 30 tabs open and no idea why half of them were there.

Bookmarks didn't really solve it either, because they remember where something is, but not when I need to come back to it. And setting a reminder on my phone meant getting an alert on the wrong device and then having to find the page again.

So I built Latr.

The idea is pretty simple:

Find something → remind yourself about it → forget about it → Latr brings the exact page back when you need it.

For example, if I'm looking at a page about a ticket sale starting Friday at 10 AM, I can highlight the date, right-click and tell Latr to remind me about it. It saves the page along with the reminder.

When the time comes, I get a notification and clicking it takes me straight back to that exact page.

There's also a keyboard shortcut (Alt + Shift + Y) if I just want to save the current page quickly.

I built a bunch of other things around the same idea too — recurring reminders, snoozing, notes, folders/tags, calendar handoff, importing existing links, etc.

One thing I was particularly intentional about is privacy: there's no account, no backend, no analytics, and no telemetry. The reminders stay in the browser.

It's completely free right now.

🔗 Chrome: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/latr-%E2%80%94-remind-me-about-th/lcceeepfhggkninbfbifkpalkdoinjli

🌐 Website: https://latr.page/

I'm sharing a short video showing how it works too.

This is my first time putting something I've built out there publicly, so I'd genuinely love some feedback.

Does this solve a problem you actually have?

And if you've tried it, I'd especially like to know:

  • What's confusing?
  • What feels unnecessary?
  • What's missing?
  • Would you actually keep using something like this?

I'm much more interested in hearing what sucks about it than hearing that it's great 😅

u/SmartDepartment3785 — 1 day ago

53 Million Installs Without a Future: Who Will Capture Users of Disappearing MV2 Extensions?

Manifest V2 extensions are being pulled out of Chrome Web Store. The question is: who will build the Manifest V3 alternatives users search for next?

On August 31, 2026, Chrome Web Store will remove every remaining Manifest V2 extension. For developers maintaining older products, this is a migration deadline. For everyone else, it is a rare window: users of thousands of extensions are starting to look for replacements for tools they used to rely on. Chrome’s official timeline

My name is Anjey. I have been building browser extensions for more than ten years. Today, I am working on a service that helps extension creators monetize their products through subscriptions and better understand their audiences through analytics.

I looked at the remaining MV2 extensions in Chrome Web Store not as technical legacy, but as a map of demand: which jobs people already solve in the browser, which products are losing support, and where an independent alternative can be prepared in advance.

MV2 Is Not Going Away Someday — Demand for Replacements Already Exists

August 31 is when the remaining MV2 listings disappear from Chrome Web Store. But it is not the first day of the problem.

Chrome has already disabled Manifest V2 for users, and MV2 extensions stop working on Chrome 139 and later. Once a listing is removed from the Store, its old version can no longer be properly found, reinstalled, or updated. Chrome explains the transition in its official timeline

That means demand for alternatives does not start after August 31. It already appears when:

  • an extension stops working after a Chrome update;
  • a user changes computers or browser profiles;
  • an extension cannot be installed again;
  • its developer does not release an MV3 version;
  • a familiar product is still known, but no longer has a future.

This is not about building a clone overnight. It is about preparing for the moment when a user searches for an old tool’s name and adds one word: alternative, replacement, not working, or Manifest V3.

This Is Not a Small Market: 13,000 Products and 53.8 Million Installs

In my local Chrome Web Store dataset, collected on August 7, 2026, 13,005 MV2 listings remained after excluding themes. Chrome Web Store displayed an install count for 9,867 of them.

Metric Value
MV2 listings in the dataset 13,005
Listings with an available install count 9,867
Total known installs 53.8M
Installs held by the top 1,000 MV2 products 50.5M
Top 1,000 share of all known installs 94.0%

These figures do not mean that 53 million users will suddenly lose their extensions at once. Store-reported installs are rounded counts, not active users, revenue, or retention.

But they show something else: demand has already been proven. People installed these products, used them, and left reviews. And nearly all meaningful demand is concentrated not in thousands of small listings, but in the first thousand.

That is where it makes sense to look for opportunities.

Not Every Disappearing Extension Is an Attractive Target

The largest install count is not automatically a ready-made business idea.

A large extension may belong to Google, Microsoft, Adobe, or another established company. It may have a brand, distribution, enterprise customers, and an ecosystem around it. Such a product is a poor candidate for direct imitation.

But it can still reveal something valuable: the job users have become accustomed to doing in the browser.

For the top 1,000 MV2 extensions, I also looked at ratings and reviews.

Signal Number What to do with it
Products with 100+ reviews 656 Read reviews and look for repeated requests
Rating of 3.5 or lower with 100+ reviews 191 Check what specifically frustrates users
Installs held by that low-rated group 6.44M This is meaningful demand, not isolated experiments
High-priority products for manual research 32 Start here: demand, reviews, and signs of a problem
Products worth monitoring 223 Watch for a working MV3 successor

The most useful signal is not popularity alone. It is the combination of three factors:

  1. The extension has meaningful installs.
  2. It has enough reviews to reveal the real user pain.
  3. Its developer does not have a strong, clear, working MV3 successor.

When all three conditions are present, this is no longer an abstract niche. It is a specific user workflow with proven demand and a possible gap in the market.

How to Use an Old Extension’s Name Correctly

The name of a disappearing product is not just a brand. It is a search query with very clear intent.

A person searching for a familiar extension already understands the problem, knows the outcome they want, and is often ready to install an alternative immediately. That is much stronger than cold traffic from a broad query such as “productivity extension.”

Using those keywords is therefore logical. But it is important not to create the impression that you are the original developer.

A workable approach looks like this:

  • build an independent product with its own name and clear value;
  • use the former product’s name in comparison materials, documentation, articles, and migration pages when the comparison is honest;
  • explain which specific job your product solves and how it differs;
  • use keywords only where they are genuinely relevant to the product’s functionality.

Do not copy an icon, pretend to be an official product, use phrases such as “the new official version,” or turn the description into a list of other brands. Chrome Web Store prohibits misleading metadata, impersonation of another developer, and irrelevant keyword spam. Chrome Web Store policies

But “users search for this product because it solved a specific task” is a completely legitimate foundation for positioning.

What to Build Instead of the Disappearing Product

A weak idea is to see a popular extension and reproduce its entire menu, interface, and twenty-feature list.

A strong idea is to find the one job people installed it for and do that job better.

For example, a user may be searching for an old extension not because the brand matters, but because they need to:

  • move data from a page into a CRM;
  • download or convert a file;
  • fill in a form from page data;
  • save a conversation or webpage in a structured format;
  • process PDFs;
  • automate a repetitive browser action;
  • work with media, tabs, links, or web data;
  • connect two work tools without manual copying.

The winner is not the person who reproduces the old extension in full. The winner is the person who makes the core workflow faster, simpler, and more reliable.

A disappearing MV2 product gives you an advantage: you do not have to guess whether the problem exists. You need to understand which part of the solution users valued and which part they disliked.

A Simple Model for Choosing Candidates

I would not start with “the top 1,000 extensions.” I would start with a short list and inspect every product manually.

Question Why it matters
Does it have at least 10k installs? This is a minimum signal of meaningful demand
Does it have 100+ reviews? You can investigate real complaints and expectations
Is there a working MV3 version? If there is, the replacement window may already be closed
What job sits behind the product? Build for the job, not a copy of the interface
Can the value be explained in one sentence? If not, the product is still too broad
Is there a path to paid features? Automation, history, volume, integrations, teams, or limits

For example, not: “a new alternative to a well-known extension.” Instead: “An extension that saves a LinkedIn lead to your CRM with a note and tags in one click.”

Not: “a universal PDF tool.” Instead: “An extension that extracts specific fields from incoming PDFs and sends them to a spreadsheet.”

The first description tries to capture branded demand. The second explains what a user may be willing to pay for.

The strongest version combines both approaches: you understand which old product the user is searching for, but you sell them a better outcome — not someone else’s name.

How to Make Money During the Transition

This market has three clear models.

First: an independent alternative. Take one job from a disappearing product, improve it, and release an MV3 solution.

Second: a paid version of a familiar workflow. Give the user the core result for free. Charge when scale begins: batch processing, history, sync, automation, integrations, and team collaboration.

Third: services for owners of older extensions. Not every developer will be able to migrate well or in time. They may need an audit, development help, testing, subscription migration, or a safe MV3 release.

For an independent developer, the first model is usually the most interesting: enter a niche where users already understand the problem and are actively looking for a new tool.

The Main Point

Manifest V2 is not only a technical sunset for an old platform.

It is a moment when part of existing demand loses its familiar products. In my dataset, that means 13,000 MV2 listings and 53.8 million known installs, with almost all of that demand concentrated in the top 1,000 products.

You do not need to replace everything at once. Find one product with a real audience, understand its core workflow, study its reviews, and build an independent MV3 alternative that solves the job better.

August 31 will not create a market from zero. It will simply make an existing problem more visible.

Which categories of disappearing MV2 extensions would you like to explore next: PDFs, CRM, automation, files, media, development tools, education, or data workflows? Leave a comment — I can break down a specific niche from the top 1,000 list and show where demand, complaints, and room for a new product actually exist.

Extension data is based on a local Chrome Web Store dataset collected on August 7, 2026. Store-reported install counts are not active users, revenue, growth, or retention. The list is intended for demand research, not as a prediction of which extensions will be removed or successfully replaced.

reddit.com
u/atldays — 1 day ago
▲ 3 r/chrome_extensions+1 crossposts

I got tired of wasting 40 minutes on YouTube just to find one answer, so I built this.

AskYouTube lets you ask questions directly about the video you're watching.

Instead of scrubbing through a 1-hour tutorial, podcast, lecture, or review, you can just ask:

  • “What does he recommend?”
  • “When does she explain pricing?”
  • “What are the main arguments?”
  • “Which tool does he use?”
  • “Summarize the part about X.”

And get the answer without hunting through the entire video.

YouTube does have some AI functionality for this already, but it relies on Gemini, and in my experience, it’s pretty limited.

With this extension, you can choose the AI model you prefer, instead of being locked into one.

It works directly from YouTube as a browser extension, and it's free to use.

I originally built it because I watch a ridiculous amount of long-form YouTube content and kept thinking: why can't I just ask the video what I need to know?

So now you can.

Try it here: https://lappice.com/

Would love to know what you think, especially which AI you prefer and what kind of videos you'd use it for.

AskYouTube, ask the video instead of searching through it.

u/Sanneck — 1 day ago

I made a tiny Chrome extension that remembers where you stopped scrolling

I kept running into a small but annoying problem:

I would be reading a long article, documentation page, research paper, or Reddit thread, close the tab, come back later — and have to find where I stopped again.

So I built Scroll Memory, a small Chrome extension that remembers your scroll position and brings you back to where you left off.

The idea is intentionally simple:

  • Remembers where you stopped on a page
  • Restores your position when you return
  • Useful for long articles, documentation, papers, tutorials, etc.
  • First 5 restores each month are free
  • $1/month if you actually find it useful

I’m experimenting with a simple idea:

Can very small software solve problems that are annoying enough to be worth $1?

I’d especially like to know:

Would you actually use something like this?

And if not, what would make it useful enough for you?

Chrome Web Store:
https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/jhademdbhjggiodhadfifkpcnpalejoj?utm_source=item-share-cb

u/Gold-Mulberry-4179 — 1 day ago
▲ 2 r/chrome_extensions+1 crossposts

I found my Chrome extension was reading an icon as every campaign's name, then rebuilt it on the official API

I build KeywordAxe, a Chrome extension for Google Ads users (keyboard shortcuts, spend-anomaly alerts, bulk negative keywords). It has opt-in telemetry, and for months that telemetry quietly showed a core feature running but finding nothing — for everyone.


The cause was a good lesson in the fragility of DOM scraping. The extension read the campaigns table by column position. Google reshuffled that table in 2026: each row now starts with a checkbox and an expand-chevron cell, and the chevron is a Material icon rendered as *ligature text* — the literal string
"expand_more". So my extractor read every campaign's name as "expand_more" and
they all collapsed into one junk record. "Found nothing" and "silently broken"
produce identical output, so nobody noticed — including me — until the telemetry pattern gave it away.


I patched the scraper (read the header row, map columns by name, strip the icon
ligatures), then decided scraping a UI Google can reshuffle anytime was a losing game and rebuilt the data layer on the official Google Ads API — read-only OAuth (PKCE) from an MV3 service worker, with the developer token + client secret in a stateless Cloudflare Worker relay so nothing sensitive ships in the extension.


Stack: vanilla JS, no bundler, MV3, Cloudflare Workers, IndexedDB for the local
fallback. Happy to talk about the scraping→API migration, the MV3 OAuth flow, or the relay design.


Chrome Web Store: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/gcgpkjmlpfppmejefedicclpbdfncdfp
u/rktreddy — 1 day ago

Anyone else struggling to find a good SaaS idea?

Hi everyone,
I’m struggling to come up with a good idea to build. I’m interested in creating a Chrome extension or a micro-SaaS, but I just can’t seem to find an idea that feels worth pursuing.
Sometimes I wonder if I’m just not capable of thinking of ideas like this. Does anyone else feel the same way?

reddit.com
u/AccordingMap9478 — 1 day ago
▲ 56 r/chrome_extensions+2 crossposts

My Chrome extension made $217 in its first week — breakdown by country

I built Wapes AI, a Chrome extension for WhatsApp Web (bulk messaging + AI CRM). Launched it 7 days ago with zero ads, just cold outreach and posting in relevant communities.

Results so far:

  • 10 successful payments, $217 total, only 2 failed charges
  • Revenue split across Argentina ($127.49), Peru ($44.99), Colombia ($15), Mexico ($14.99), and Chile ($10)

What surprised me most: as a solo dev with no big following, having paying users across 5 countries in week one proved people will pay for a Chrome extension that solves a real problem — even without brand recognition.

What worked:

  • Talking to potential users before building anything
  • Charging from day one instead of "polishing" first
  • Posting in communities where WhatsApp/small-business users already are

Happy to answer questions about building and monetizing a Chrome extension, the tech stack, or how I got early users.

u/Much-Business4975 — 2 days ago
▲ 17 r/chrome_extensions+4 crossposts

I wanted my new tab to feel like a workspace, so I built one.

The idea was pretty simple: instead of treating a new tab as a blank page, make it a lightweight workspace.

I'm particularly interested in the UX right now.

The current version has:

• App shortcuts

• Bookmark collections

• Quick notes

• Tasks

• Focus timer

• Wallpapers

• Weather

• Designer/developer-focused widgets

One thing I deliberately tried to avoid was turning it into a giant widget dashboard. I want the interface to stay calm and useful.

For people who use New Tab extensions:

What feature makes you actually keep one installed?

And what usually makes you uninstall one?

I'm looking for criticism as much as compliments.

👉 Check Cosmos

u/incodesatx — 2 days ago