u/Professional-Fee3323

​

Ramesses II is remembered as one of ancient Egypt’s most powerful builders

His name is associated with Abu Simbel Karnak and some of the most monumental architecture of the New Kingdom

But archaeology reveals something more complicated

Ramesses II completed projects started by his father Seti I and incorporated earlier monuments into his own building program

In some cases royal inscriptions on older monuments were erased and replaced with the names of later kings

This practice is known today as the usurpation of monuments

It was not unique to Ramesses II and it does not mean that every monument carrying his name was originally built by him

His reign was also marked by an enormous building program designed to make his presence and royal legacy visible across Egypt

So was Ramesses II simply one of Egypt’s greatest builders

Or was he also exceptionally skilled at turning the achievements of earlier generations into part of his own legacy

What do you think

The strange thing is not that Enlil decided to drown humanity, the strange thing is that the decision was made in a divine council, and they all swore not to tell anyone, as if they were afraid of something

And stranger still, Enki did not break the oath directly, he did not go to Ziusudra and tell him to escape, instead he stood behind a reed wall and pretended to speak to the wall itself, so the sleeping man inside could hear him, a god tricking a divine oath with a linguistic loophole

Why all this maneuvering, why did he not confront Enlil directly

Then came the flood, seven days and seven nights as the texts say, and after the water calmed, Ziusudra came down from the boat and offered a sacrifice, then the gods gathered like flies around the sacrifice, that is the literal Sumerian expression, the same gods who destroyed humans because their smell and noise bothered them, came begging around the smell of roasted meat because they starved after the humans who fed them disappeared

This is the real strangeness

Enlil did not spare humans out of mercy, he discovered that without them, the gods starve to death, no offerings, no temples, no meaning for their existence

So he decided to keep a small portion of them, not out of love, but out of need, like a farmer keeping some cattle after slaughtering the herd

From here, the idea of the chosen lineage seems less holy and more strange, what if the selection was not an honor, but just keeping a useful bloodline, a bloodline that knows how to build, how to offer sacrifices, how to obey

Ziusudra was not saved because he was the most righteous, but because he lived in the right reed hut, on the right night, and heard the whisper from behind the wall

The entire religious history after that, from Noah to Abraham, may not be a series of exciting miracles, but a series of strange and repeated attempts by higher beings trying to fix a mistake they made, that they created a being they cannot live without, and cannot live with

​

The story of Cain and Abel is familiar. But what happened after the murder?

Where did Cain settle? What happened to his descendants? And why do some ancient traditions connect Cain’s lineage with the beginnings of cities and civilization?

Then comes an even stranger question

Why do similar stories appear in other ancient cultures such as Osiris and Set in Egypt?

Are these simply recurring myths, or echoes of older traditions that were transformed over time?

And where did the knowledge of the first civilizations come from?

Cain. Abel. Enoch.

The first cities. Ancient Egypt.

Perhaps the murder of Abel wasn't the end of the story… but the beginning.

What do you think? 🌑

​

Our group is called Alternative History.

But lately, it feels as though alternative history itself is no longer welcome here.

Instead of encouraging questions comparisons and debate, some members seem determined to defend the conventional historical narrative at all costs. Any interpretation that challenges the mainstream is quickly dismissed, ridiculed, or pushed aside before it can even be examined.

That is not how historical inquiry should work.

Questioning the accepted narrative does not automatically make an idea true. But neither does being outside the mainstream automatically make an idea false.

The same principle should apply in both directions.

If an ancient structure raises difficult engineering questions, examine them.

If an artifact has competing interpretations discuss the evidence.

If a conventional explanation is stronger, demonstrate why.

And if an alternative explanation has weaknesses, expose them through evidence rather than simply silencing the people proposing it.

History should not be protected from questions.

It should be strengthened by them.

We are not asking anyone to abandon established scholarship. We are asking for an environment where unconventional hypotheses can be examined honestly and where evidence matters more than labels.

So how long should voices calling for a broader and more critical approach to history continue to be dismissed?

If you agree that historical research needs more openness and less tribalism, comment:

REFORM

And let's make this simple:

Don't silence alternative ideas.

Challenge them.

Test them.

Debate them.

And let the evidence decide.

​

The official story says yes.

We live in the age of satellites artificial intelligence nuclear energy genetic engineering quantum computing and machines capable of traveling beyond our planet. By almost every conventional measurement modern civilization appears to stand at the technological summit of human history.

But there is another question one that refuses to disappear.

What if our civilization is not the first to reach extraordinary levels of knowledge?

Across the ancient world there are structures and artifacts that continue to provoke debate not necessarily because they prove a lost technological civilization but because some of them challenge our assumptions about what ancient societies were capable of organizing engineering and constructing.

Consider the Great Pyramid of Giza. An enormous monument built with millions of stone blocks aligned with remarkable precision and constructed on a scale that still inspires engineering discussions.

Then there is Baalbek where enormous megalithic stones including the famous Trilithon blocks reach hundreds of tons in weight. Some ancient quarry stones associated with the site are even larger.

And the mystery becomes more fascinating when we examine ancient reliefs.

At Abydos certain carvings have been interpreted by modern audiences as resembling helicopters aircraft or submarines. Mainstream Egyptology however explains these forms as the result of overlapping inscriptions and later recarving rather than evidence of ancient aviation or submarines.

That distinction matters.

Because the real mystery is not necessarily whether ancient people had airplanes.

The more interesting question is how much do we actually understand about the technological capabilities engineering methods and intellectual achievements of civilizations that existed thousands of years ago?

Ancient civilizations possessed sophisticated mathematics astronomy surveying metallurgy architecture hydraulic engineering and organizational systems. Yet popular history sometimes reduces them to primitive societies that somehow progressed in a perfectly linear march toward us.

Perhaps reality was more complicated.

Civilizations can rise collapse migrate lose knowledge preserve knowledge and rediscover technologies independently. A civilization does not have to possess modern technology to be extraordinarily sophisticated.

And this leads to the uncomfortable possibility.

Human progress may not be a straight line.

Perhaps history is not a staircase leading inevitably toward the present.

Perhaps it is a cycle of discovery achievement collapse forgetting and rediscovery.

So when we look at the monuments left behind by ancient humanity perhaps we should ask a different question.

Not how could primitive people build this?

But what if our ancestors were far more technologically and intellectually sophisticated than we have imagined?

The evidence does not prove that a lost industrial civilization existed before recorded history.

But it does prove something much simpler and perhaps more profound.

The ancient world still has questions we have not completely answered.

And if that is true

Are we really looking at the technological peak of humanity or merely the latest chapter in a much older story?

These walls are perhaps the greatest evidence of humanity’s decline.

Human beings were once great and possessed technology far more advanced than what we have today. But after a conspiracy by dark entities, humanity underwent a systematic downfall.

Religions and sects were established to prevent humanity from uniting again and to ensure that no one would ever attempt to repeat the experience of building the Tower of Babel.

These controllers placed a ceiling on human knowledge. One of the greatest clues is the expulsion of Adam after he gained knowledge, followed by the division of humanity after its unity in the construction of the Tower of Babel.

And then came the destruction of ‘Ad after they supposedly discovered the lost factories of immortality—technology that humanity has since forgotten.

From Mesopotamia to the ancient civilizations of the Americas mysterious handbags and pine cones appear in carvings separated by vast oceans. Were they simply sacred symbols or do they represent deeper spiritual concepts that remain one of history's greatest mysteries?

Take a mechanical engineering perspective on the mysterious Sabu Disc one of ancient Egypt's most debated artifacts. Was it a ceremonial object, an advanced engineering design or something we still don't fully understand? Explore the evidence, theories and craftsmanship behind this extraordinary relic.

Homer's epic, the Iliad, has seen its pivotal characters, whom we knew like the back of our hands, being toyed with. Do you see this as normal, or is history truly written according to personal whims?

Every time I read descriptions of Yahweh in parts of the Old Testament—jealous, vengeful, commanding wars, the destruction of entire populations, and the sending of plagues— can't help but think of one question.

Could these traits resemble the portrayal of Enlil in Sumerian mythology, who is depicted as bringing the Great Flood and punishing humanity because their noise disturbed him?

Is this simply a literary and mythological parallel, or could there be a deeper historical connection between these ancient traditions?

What do you think?

​

The Maya the Zulu and Arcadian traditions all contain stories describing a world before a great catastrophe. Some legends speak of multiple brilliant lights in the heavens, while others describe fiery celestial bodies with long tails like serpents crossing the sky.

According to these traditional accounts The Maya the Zulu, and Arcadian traditions all contain stories describing a world before a great catastrophe. Some legends speak of multiple brilliant lights in the heavens, while others describe fiery celestial bodies with long tails like serpents crossing the sky.

According to these traditional accounts a devastating cosmic event transformed the world, leaving only a single luminous body in the night sky the one we now call the Moon.

These stories are part of ancient mythology and oral tradition not established historical or scientific fact. Yet they continue to inspire questions about how our ancestors understood the heavens and remembered catastrophic events.a devastating cosmic event transformed the world leaving only a single luminous body in the night sky the one we now call the Moon.

These stories are part of ancient mythology and oral tradition, not established historical or scientific fact. Yet they continue to inspire questions about how our ancestors understood the heavens and remembered catastrophic events.

Ancient Sumerian seals depict a figure seated on a throne, facing several people with a strange object between them. Some scholars interpret it as a symbolic religious emblem while others speculate it could represent forgotten technology. Thousands of years later its true meaning remains debated.

But

Are we looking at a sacred symbol or the last surviving image of a technology we no longer understand?

​

Ancient Sumerian texts describe the earliest kings with extraordinarily long lifespans, sometimes recorded using the Sar unit, a large numerical measure in Mesopotamian tradition. In Hindu tradition, the Satya Yuga is remembered as a golden age when humanity was said to possess great wisdom, purity, and remarkably long lives. In ancient Egypt, Thoth was associated with wisdom, time, and sacred knowledge, leading some researchers to connect him symbolically with humanity's earliest ages.

Sacred scriptures also describe unusually long lifespans in the earliest generations.

The Book of Genesis records figures such as Methuselah, who lived 969 years, followed by a gradual decline in human longevity. The Quran states that Prophet Noah preached to his people for one thousand years minus fifty, while also emphasizing that every soul has an appointed lifespan.

So the question remains:

Did human lifespans truly become shorter over time because of environmental or biological changes? Or are these ancient numbers symbolic, based on different systems of timekeeping, or preserving memories of a forgotten age

​

Imagine you hold a coin and decide to flip it in the air to succeed in getting heads ten billion times in a row without a single error your mind will immediately tell you that this is mathematically impossible yet this is exactly what scientists face when trying to explain the existence of Earth's moon with its current characteristics through mere coincidence

Earth's moon is not just a natural satellite as its size represents 27% of our planet's volume which is an exceptional ratio that makes our system resemble a double planet compared to other moons in the solar system that do not exceed 3% or 4% of their host planet's volume this size is not just for show as it is the gravitational stabilizer that maintains Earth's axial tilt at 23.5 degrees and is the sole guarantor of the stability of our climate and our seasons

More suspicious is the geometric alignment in the sky where the Sun's diameter is 400 times that of the Moon while it is 400 times farther away than the Moon which gives us the sight of a total solar eclipse with precision that is not repeated at any other point in the solar system

The combination of this massive size 27% and the precise distance that creates the eclipse puts us before a legitimate question that transcends traditional textbook texts are we truly facing a series of rare cosmic coincidences or do the Ancient Mysteries surrounding the moon's existence hide a story much larger than what we have been told

​

​In its ancient world, the giant "Quetzalcoatlus" would take off with a single leap and one wing beat, thanks to air density (10 bar pressure) that allowed it to "swim" through the air. In our current world (1 bar pressure), aeronautical science dictates that it would need to run at speeds exceeding 70 km/h to take off—a feat it could not achieve, turning its existence into one of the ancient mysteries.

There are people who simply do not like to think When you present them with a new idea they do not debate it or try to disprove it They simply say It is complicated

So let me ask you one simple question

If Quetzalcoatlus was about the size of a small airplane and truly flew in the past could it fly in our world today

My answer is almost impossible

Not because nature forgot how to make giant creatures fly but because our world itself has changed

I believe the greatest tyrant ruling Earth today is not a living creature but an atmospheric pressure of 1 bar

In my view this prison makes the existence of giant creatures as they once were almost impossible

But what if this tyrant also existed in the past except that it was restrained and ancient Earth operated under conditions that allowed giant creatures to live and fly

If you think I am wrong then answer the first question

How could a creature the size of an airplane fly in the past while it seems almost impossible in our world today

While traditional references drown us in the story of the Flood as an act of cosmic purification forbidden questions remain suspended in the nebula of history Was the water truly sufficient to erase the traces of the Giants or was the Flood merely an intermission between two eras of savagery

​The Sumerian carvings that defy logic whisper to us truths far beyond mere myths massive creatures and dinosaurs that wandered beneath the feet of our ancestors remains of living beings that the water did not kill but which proved their existence before being wiped from the official record The inability of biophysics to explain the ability of creatures like the Quetzalcoatlus to fly in our current atmosphere opens the door to a terrifying possibility The physical conditions of the Earth changed radically after the Flood

​There is a tyrant or an entity or a greater secret ignored by science with cold detachment as if it were written by those who came centuries after the Flood to erase the trace of those who were here before us We are not reading history we are reading what we have been permitted to read

Was Yahweh always the name of a god… or is the story more complicated?

Around 2,800 years ago, a scene was carved into stone and historians still debate it today.

King Jehu of Israel appears bringing tribute to Shalmaneser III of Assyria.

But here’s the question nobody asks:

If ancient names often carried kings and gods together

when does a political name become something sacred?

And why did this stone become one of the most discussed artifacts of the ancient world?

Watch the full video

🎬

THE FORBIDDEN OBELISK information in comments

When a young Egyptian shows pride in her ancestors who built the pyramids she faces backlash Is this part of a systematic attempt to disconnect modern Egyptians from the builders of the ancient advanced civilization? #ForbiddenHistory #AncientMysteries

The Sumerians were intentionally sidelined while glory was lavished upon the stone structures of Egypt as if the global system wants us to see only the stone and remain blind to the truth the truth which says the Sumerians did not just write myths on clay tablets but recorded the code for the origin of humanity

​Where is Eden where is the true story of the flood why do the names of the ancient gods repeat in every civilization while their Sumerian origins are buried under layers of neglect while the world is busy staring at the peaks of the pyramids the secrets of the Sumerians remain at the bottom pulsing with details about cosmic systems and secrets about creators that modern science has yet to dare to confront

​It is not just a history of clay it is a battle for the consciousness of humanity so will you continue to look at the stones or will you search for the truth hidden in the clay