u/Professional-Feed668

As we all know boone has been in a program in prison that is geared towards prisoners that are one day going to be released. Boone is there for life so many of us have wondered how she got in to the program when she does not meet the criteria..

My thought is perhaps she is a rat for the prison? Boone got caught with a load of cheese in jail which due to how much she had was deemed to be contraband. Many assume she was a rat in Jail that is why she got "gifted" so much cheese (it was not given to her a by other inmates in admiration and thanks for her advise as she has claimed). After she murdered Jorge, during the interrogation she informed the detectives about a neighbor of her that is in america and is illegal. During her time in jail she would often complain to a CO about other inmates but when the CO would tell her that they will speak to the other inmate Boone would often drop the complaint. Was her complaint a lie or was she ratting on inmates hoping to get special privileges from the CO? In prison she allegedly works in the laundry room. but when we see her phone logs she is spending hours attempting to make phone calls and occasionally she gets through to the person and will spend upto 30 minutes on the phone for each call. With the amount of time she spends on the phone - when does she work?

Although they are not under a hurricane watch, the FDC canceled all weekend visitation (Friday, October 9 through Sunday, October 11) for all Region I and Region II facilities—which includes both Lowell and Gainesville—to ensure the safety of staff, inmates, and families during the severe weather.

No birthday visits for the bish.

There are currently no hurricanes due to hit Florida, which is unusual for this time of year. But....... Something tells me Boone is preparing to cause some storms of her own in the coming weeks.

July 1 2026 state submit .their answer brief to boones appeal. It was not filed on the docket until July 2 but per cert of service defense was served July 1 2026 so if defense want to respond they have 30 days. Defense didn't respond so July 31, 2026 the appeal is now in the judges hands. This may take up to a year.

July 30, 2026 letter from Boone to DCA but it's sealed due to Boone including a PRIVELEGED letter to her from Maldonado.

Aug 3, 2026 - Boone will not be silenced and decides to send a copy of the letter she sent to the DCA to the trial court. Judge Kraynicks staff uploaded it on the docket and left it there.

The DCA nor the Trial court will respond to Boones 7/30/26 letter.

September 14 2026 - the family court judge denied boones motion for a rehearing/reconsideration. There was no court reporter at the Aug 2025 trial therefore no transcripts are available. A lack of transcripts will make it impossible for Boone to appeal the final judgement. Family court cases are civil matters and therefore Boone has to pay for transcripts not the tax payers.

October 25th 2026 it will be 2 years since she was CORRECTLY convicted of the MURDER of abused victim Jorge Torres.

We know Boone is planning some crap with Kevin Beck but that's going to have to wait until the DCA deny the direct appeal. The DCA may not respond for up to a year. I honestly do not see Boone being silent for the next year. What hell is Boone planning!!!

I am surprised Boone hasn't kicked off at judge Jackson yet shouldn't Boone remind judge Jackson that she is nothing but a hair braider and Boone is pure gold?!?

Is uncle/cousin fraud Al her current unpaid secretary!!!

I predict a shit storm unlike anything Boone has done so far.

I became a DV survivor around 20 years ago. Since then I have worked with local advocacy groups supporting others mainly women but in recent years there has been an increase in men coming forward and admitting that their partner (mainly females) are abusing them.

In all my time in the DV victim/survivor world, Boone is the first person whose story I did not believe from the first time I heard her speak. I remember the very first time watching the police interrogation. At that time I knew nothing about her. I do recall as I was listening to the interrogation turning around to my partner and telling him she is the abuser. The minute boone started to speak there was nothing but red flags.

Things that came out during the interview on that Tuesday that made me not believe Boone (in no particular order) -

1. No phone - he had been working. During the Feb 25 2020 interrogation it came out that Jorge had lost his job. Boone also revealed he had no phone. Why not?

In this day and age everyone that was breathing had a phone. Why not him? It seemed like Boone controlled who he was permitted to communicate with - RED FLAG number 1

2. Chelsea indicated there was a phone in the suit case with him - boone said she was not aware of Jorge having a phone. RED FLAG number 2 - why did she need to be made aware of him having a phone? what business wast it of hers?

3. When asked why she ignored Jorges pleas to get out of the suitcase because he couldn't breath
   Boone claimed it was because she figured he was the boy who cried wolf - This is a classic DARVO move - Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender - (this was the first indication that boone wanted to be the victim). RED FLAG number 3

4. Boone claiming - :

"I knew Jorge better than he knew himself"

This is a classic and intentional way for the abuser to isolate the victim. At this point in the interview I think Boone was seeing that she was not as in control as she wanted to be. She was seeing that neither Scott nor Chelsea were believing anything she was saying. Boone needed to get Scott and Chelsea on her side. So to do that she need to appear to them as insightful and caring and make Jorge look unstable. RED FLAG number 4

5. Claims of Porn - Once again Boone was desperate to appear like the victim. Claiming Jorge used HER phone behind HER back and watched porn. Boone wanted to be the injured party. RED FLAG number 5 - As we later found out Boone let Jorge know she knew what he was watching. This is to instill fear in Jorge to show him he has no privacy from her and that she is in charge.

6. No Bank Account - This was a MAJOR RED FLAG number 6. Jorge was working so would need a bank account to get his wages paid into. Boone was not working so why did she need a bank account? Boone needed full control of Jorge.

All the above shows was Boone controlled who Jorge spoke with and when. She controlled his access to his cash. She isolated Jorge from his family. She controlled his every move. No phone, no transport, no cash, no job. What we found out later from the autopsy at the time that Boone murdered Jorge he had no food in his stomach or colon. That meant he had not eaten for at least 24 to 72 hours prior to Boone murdering him. She clearly used food as a weapon. If her were a good boy he could eat.

Boone claimed that Jorge "scared" away all her friends. - Boone isolated Jorge but she tried to make it seem like she was the isolated person. She had access to money, phone and car. Boone controlled Jorges access to money, phone, car and access to people. If boone had friends that Jorge had scared away the reality is that they would have come forward once she got arrested and spoken for her since the so called threat aka Jorge was now dead.

None of the photos used at trial of Boones alleged wounds and bruises were backed up by police reports WHY? Because they were all fake or self inflicted. The "black eye" was boot polish or black eye shadow.

The red mark on the leg was not soup - it was a from her eating outside and resting a plate of hot food on her leg.

The "stab wound" was not from a steak knife. Doctors and nurses are mandatory reports and if they had suspected it was a knife would the would have been legally obliged to call the cops even if Boone claimed it was an accident. The property manager had told the story of how the wound occurred and said that Boone had dropped a glass on the patio and she fell and slipped on it. Boone did not call the property manager as a witness because she knew that the property manager would contradict or debunk alot of Boones claims. The property manager would have said that Jorge and Boone abused each other and were regularly drunk.

The reason no DV advocacy group has ever stood up for Boone is because none of her claims were believable. Dr Harper relied on boones self reporting to form her opinion and ignored the facts , She ignored Boones abusive behaviour since being arrested. Boone recorded Jorges pleas to be freed. Boone claimed Jorge threatened her but never recorded the threats because there was no threats from Jorge.

Remember everything Boone has accused others of doing is what Boone herself has done to Jorge and others.

Jorges death most likely saved Brians sons life. If Boone were free, then as Brians son got older and behaved like most teenagers - moodier, back talk, missing curfew, wanting to be around the parents less, etc having a world boone had no control over boone would have not have liked that she had no control in the childs life. She most likely would have done what ever she could in order to gain control over the child. We see it even from prison - she is able to get the child to go into a room away from Brian. This is so she feels in control. During the family trial - we saw that Boone did not want to have the child vaccinated against covid but Brian did it any ways. Boone was not going to ever be the one to have to care for the child if he got sick so what difference did it make if he was vaccinated or not.

Regardless of what she does she always finds a way to blame others. Not once in the 6 years of knowing about Boones existence has Boone ever said "oops my bad, I fudged up"

If Boone were valedictorian in kindergarten I think this would be her speech

"Hello everyone! Look at me up here! I am the valedictorian, which means I am officially the smartest kid in this whole room."

"Kindergarten was so easy for me. I learned my ABCs on the very first day. My finger paintings belong in a museum. I can count all the way to one hundred without even stopping for air. I am also the fastest runner on the playground, and everyone knows it."

"Some kids struggled with tying shoes or sharing blocks. Not me. I mastered the monkey bars. I built the tallest Lego towers. I even know how to spell big words like 'dinosaur' and 'genius'—which happens to be my middle name."

"First grade is not ready for me. I am going to walk in there and rule the school. Watch out, teachers, because I might end up teaching the class!"

"Thank you to myself for working so hard and being so amazing. Congratulations to me!"

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dc2zwD2kyBJ/?stkn=NnJpcHd0N2l2OHl4

I know shitzilla (aka Mackenzie Shirilla) is in Ohio but in yesterdays supreme Court ruling that denied her recent appeal request, the court state that ' It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant costs herein taxed". So shitzilla will have to pay the states costs involved in responding to her recent appeal request.

As she is in Ohio I looked up Florida to see if the same thing could happen to auld boozey and yes yes it can. Once boones direct appeal is denied she will no longer be entitled to court appointed appeal attorney and will be on her own. She can make filings asking for whatever. Knowing boozey as we do when she doesn't get the response she wants she will reask over and over again. If boozey does that then the courts can sanction her. So she may have to decide if writing a meritless appeal is worth the loss of her honeybuns.

In the past few weeks I have seen a number of questionable people supporting Boone. They seem to want to give her some consideration or allowance for her actions.

If that is you then you are in the wrong place. No one here supports her

Boone committed a violent crime. She is in prison for life. Anyone in contact with her can be publicly named because under Florida law the public is entitled to information about a prisoner.

If you don't want your name and details to be made public then don't contact a convicted murderer.

No YouTubers have doxxed you murderer supporters. Your name and details are now public because you contacted a murderer.

Boone is 20 months in her forever home and she has already committed 3 scams. 2 scams could involve the feds due to them possibly beginning in another state.

Scam 1 - Boone knowingly brought the state owned tablet with her to a family case hearing in May 2025. In a recorded phone conversation the day before the hearing Peter asked her if she can bringing the tablet with her and she said "I don't know but I am gonna do it anyway". When she got caught with the tablet she lied and said she had permission from another CO. The other CO confirmed Boone was a liar. Boone doubled down and claimed it was a misunderstanding. She got a 30 day commissary ban.

Scam 2 - prisoners can only receive physical documents from an attorney or the court. Boone wanted Peter to send her documents but wanted him to mark it as legal mail and pretend it was from her appeal attorney. This constitutes mail Fraud and prison rule violations. The prison has been advised of this fraud and we await their response. Peter is in another state so the feds could become involved.

Scam 3 - a 60 plus year old widower father of one, reached out to Boone. She has managed to speak with him on the phone but until he is an approved visitor he can't send her money or food packages. On 4/27/2026 his application where he claimed to be her cousin was denied. On 4/29/2026 he applied again claiming this time he was her uncle and got approved. She is abusing and manipulating an elderly person. As he lives in another state the Feds may become involved.

20 months in 3 scams we know about, what will she do for the rest of her pathetic life??? what is her next scam?

I hope prison permanently revoke her calls and visits. Calls, visits and commissary are privileges not rights

Reporting boones scams to the prison and the court is important. Lets deprive her of as much as is possible. Jorge can't chat with his children anymore why should she be able to.

It is believed that boones new approved visitor who is listed as her "uncle" is not her uncle. When he originally applied to be a visitor he noted that he was her cousin. He got denied 4/26/2026. On 4/29/2026 he somehow became her uncle.

This "uncle" maybe facing criminal charges once the prison finds out about this fake applications.

1)Illegal Entry by Misrepresentation (Fla. Stat. § 944.39): Under Florida law, no person may use a disguise, misrepresentation of identity, or other illicit means to attempt to gain admission or visiting privileges at a state correctional facility.

Penalty: Second-degree misdemeanor.

Consequences: Up to 60 days in county jail, 6 months probation, and court fines. FDC correctional officers or inspectors are legally authorized to arrest someone violating this statute

2. False Official Statement to Mislead a Public Servant (Fla. Stat. § 837.06): Submitting a written application containing knowingly false statements (claiming to be a cousin, then an uncle) to a state agency/public servant (FDC classification officers) to mislead them in their official duties is a criminal offense.

Penalty: Second-degree misdemeanor

Consequences: Up to 60 days in jail and a $500 fine per count.

3)Unsworn Perjury / False Documents (Fla. Stat. § 837.012): If the FDC visitation/contact application required a signed attestation or declaration under penalty of perjury asserting that all information provided was true, lying on the form can be prosecuted as perjury in an unofficial proceeding.

Penalty: First-degree misdemeanor.

Consequences: Up to 1 year in jail and a $1,000 fine.

He will also be banned from contacting Boone or any other inmates in a Florida prison and any JPay account he has set up to transfer funds will be permanently closed. Because he is in Colorado and Boone is in Florida this may get the feds involved because it crossed state line. If Boone is the first murderer he has contacted it would be considered isolated and the feds may do nothing but if he contacts multiple criminals in multiple states the Feds will likely investigate him.

Boone may also face repercussions for her lies

FDC Disciplinary Reports (DRs): She can be charged with conspiracy, lying to staff, or misuse of communications.

Loss of Privileges: She faces loss of canteen, loss of phone/visitation privileges, and placement in disciplinary confinement ( locked up for 23 hours, no phone, tablet or visitors allowed).

Commissary, phone, tablet and visitation is a privilege that the prison allows the prisoners to have it is not a right.

The more people that report Boone the quicker she will get punished.

Remember folks Boone has some flying monkeys that frequently read what we say about the case and return to their master and tell Boone all about it.

Please do not post anything here that would be helpful to her.

If Boone does something or something in the legal world changes and you know how she can address it then talk about the situation but please don't give her any remedy on how to address it. In law everything has a timeframe when things can be done. Please gloat after a deadline has passed. No harm in saying something like " for X she could have done Y but the time to do that has passed so she can't do squat now" and then laugh your butt off.

Boone is the abuser.

Boone is the murderer .

Boone is where she belongs.

There is currently a document on the DCA docket filed on July 30 2026 but as of 8/5/26 it is not publicly accessible.

We all talked on 7/30/26 about what this document could be.

My belief is that it may well be the original poison pen letter that appeared on the trial docket 8/3/26.

The poison pen letter was date 7/22/26. I believe Boone originally sent the poison pen letter to the DCA only and it was received and docketed o 7/30/26. The cert of service/page 3 said it was also sent to Maldonado , the trial court and the state. I don't believe she sent it to them at the same time that she sent the poison pen letter to the DCA.

Once Boone realized that letter was not going to be made public via the DCA portal she decided to send it to the trial court. If you look at page 1 although Boone dated it 7/22/26 it was not stamped as received by the prison until 7/31/26. Did she send it to her attorney and the state as she claimed?

Boone lies in her certs of service.

For the family trial she was ordered by Judge Jackson to send copies of any evidence she wanted to use at trial to both the court and to Brians attorney. In a call with Peter she acknowledged this but said she will send it to the court and they can send Brians attorney copies of her evidence. At trial Brians attorney could have objected to her using any of her evidence but he didn't and instead just viewed what the court received.

Boone takes orders as suggestions. Boone is a liar.

A certain someone is currently in Summas comments claiming an attorney told Boone to write to the DCA and that the attorney drafted the letter Boone sent.

I find it very hard to believe a real attorney told Boone to disobey a court order and go ahead and write this. If they did then they should be disbarred. A law student on their first day of law school knows you NEVER disobey a court order.

I hope the DCA financially sanction Boone for disobeying their order.

Boones history with attorneys

Criminal case - 7 court appointed and Padilla was pro bono all with drew. Then owen and 3 attorneys and one jury consultant did the trial pro bono.

 So criminal case she had 12 plus a jury consultant.  4 of the court appointed attorneys withdrew due to 3 of them having conflicts and one was moving out of town. Boone has bad mouthed all the attorneys:

Padilla - he was based in miami and she accused him of using her so he could bring his family to Orlando under the guise of seeing her then bringing his family to Disney. He was pro giving her his time for free. She didn't look a gift horse in the mouth, she didn't even take the whole damn mouth she shot him and he ran.

Bankowitz - she called him names repeatedly in a number of letters. He left and stated she would never be happy with any attorney unless she was their only client.

Hobson - was brief he withdrew because of ethical reasons.

Cashman - Boone demanded the court order her to be nice to her. She accused Cashman of never showing her her discovery. Cashman pointed out that not only has Boone seen her discovery there are notes on some of the reports in boones handwriting.

She insulted all of them to the court, attempted to damage their reputation and then cried victim when they withdrew.

Boone did a brief few weeks pro bono and did nothing but complain about everything.

Owens flew in giving his services for free he brought with him 3 other attorneys and a jury consultant. During trial when asked by the judge if she was happy with her team she regularly said she was very happy. As soon as she was found guilty Owens and his team took off and Owens went dark for a while

Criminal case 12 attorneys and one jury consultant.

Family case - she had one attorney at the beginning of the divorce in late 2017 that withdrew after 6 weeks in early 2018.

Bankowitz was one of the criminal court appointed attorney and he did pro bono work on her family case but she screwed that up and called him a buffoon in the criminal case.

She accused Owens of taking some family court documents from her and that he refused to give them back. She asked judge Jackson to order Owens to give them back. Judge had no jurisdiction over him and denied boones request.

PB&J lined up a pro bono to take on her case. After a 2 hour conversation with Boone the attorney said no way.

Family case - 2 officially were attorney of record and withdrew. Owens and pb&j attorney were never on the record but considered it and said nope.

Appeal attorneys 4 attorneys

1st appeal attorney withdrew immediately as he was no longer doing appeals.

2nd attorney - Adams appointed December 2024. Boone wrote a letter in May 2025 complaining about Adams only contacting her once and ignoring all her attempts to speak with him. 6bweeks later Adams withdraws claiming he is no longer doing appeals. I often wonder if that was truthful or if he just did not want to deal with Boone anymore?

3rd appeal attorney - Withdrew because he was taking a job at the prosecutors office.

4th Appeal attorney - Maldonado appointed September 2025. Filed appeal April 2026. Boone writes to the DCA and trial court July 2026 and makes false accusations about Maldonado (proven by her own evidence in the letter).

Total attorneys so far :

Criminal - 12 plus a jury consultant

Family 2 on the record and 2 that looked

Appeal - 4 . Boone will get no further court appointed appeal attorney.

That is a total of 20 attorneys that have attempted to assist Boone over the years. I counted my Bankowitz and Owen once in the criminal case and once in the family case so technically it is 18 actual attorneys Boone has had.

I have seen criminals with 30 or 40 years of criminal history go through less attorneys then Boone has gone through.

Boone thinks all the issues with the attorneys is their fault. She is the common denominator. Boone is THE PROBLEM.

Once again she misrepresented what Maldonados letter said. He is not abandoning his responsibilities. He simply stated he was not going to reply to the states reply. He believes he has thoroughly made his point in his initial brief. 

Even if he did respond to the states reply Boone is once again WRONG. Even if Maldonado intended to respond to the states reply he CAN NOT give new arguments in a reply. A reply brief is discretionary

His letter was very clear "I made the best arguments I could in this case in light of all the circumstances."

It is so obvious that Maldonado did not raise any of what Boone wanted him to raise. There were no factual inaccuracies or legal misstatements.

Boone is playing with fire by ignoring the court of appeals order to not contact them directly. She even admits that is what she is doing. Florida does NOT permit hybrid representation. The DCA could impose financial sanctions on her for doing so.

By sending her attorneys private letter directly to the DCA she has now waived attorney client privilege

This poison pen letters she has submitted is unauthorized. She can not validate sending it by claiming it is "in good faith" .

It is currently on the trial court docket but the trial judge has no justification and won't do anything.

It is currently not on the DCA docket because 1) they have a different system than the trial court so it may take a day or so BUT 2) She has already been ordered not to contact the court directly and she is currently represented so the clerk may just return to sender and it will never appear on the docket.

If boone is making these accusations against Maldonado hoping he withdraws and her appeal restarts she is once again WRONG. The appeal is "ripe" and therefore in the hands of the judges. Maldonado can withdraw before the appeal judges make any decisions on the appeal because of boones newest poison pen letter. If he does so it is highly unlikely that a new appeal attorney will be appointed as there is no further legal work to be done because the appeal is in the hands of the judges

Under Florida law Boone only gets one Court appointed appeal attorney for the direct appeal.

Once this appeal is affirmed Boone gets no further court appointed attorneys. She will be pro se. More crap will no doubt be incoming from her.

There is a worldwide issue in prisons with people in the free world soaking letters, cards, pictures, books etc in a liquid form of drugs. That is why prisons don't allow prisoners to receive physical documents from the outside. What happens is the mail room in the prison will open the letter and scan in the document and send it to the prisoners tablet. Prisoners can only receive physical documents directly from the court or their attorney of record (most attorneys are trustworthy and don't deal in drugs). If they want a book or a bible it must be sent directly from an authorized provider.

Boone has now revealed to the public how prisoners obtain physical documents by getting the sender pretending they are their attorney. Now I am not saying that every prisoner that does this is trying to get access to drugs but alot of them are.

The more members of the public tell Lowell what Boone has said the more alert the prison will be. They are definitely going to have to change the process of receiving "legal" mail. All thanks to Boone.

Wonder what will happen when the prison drug dealers find out what Boone has done??

Now because Boone has tried to get pb&j to send her documents illegally by marking it as "legal mail' there is a very good chance she has tried to get some of her other flying monkeys to do the same. I think Boone feels "important " when she has paperwork.

The prison may prohibit her from getting any visitors. If the prison allows her to continue getting visitors then those visitors may have to undergo strip searches before visiting her. Who suffers? Brian and his son.

I understand Brians son was not present during Boone fighting Jorge, but knowing a child lives there even part time why was CPS never called?

All the neighbors interviewed said both Boone and Jorge were drunk from sun up to sun down. If I saw my neighbor drunk on a regular basis I would call CPS.

The night that Boone decided to walk barefoot from her place to Brians home at 1.30am while drunk to drop the child off and the cops became involved again why weren't CPS called???

I believe Boone was a danger to Brians son before she murdered Jorge and she continues to be a danger.