Estoy por mandar portafolio para ver dónde puedo hacer mis prácticas profesionales, estoy a un año de salir de la carrera. Honestamente me siento muy frustrado porque tengo ya 26 años recién cumplidos. Estudie otra carrera y terminé dejándola a la mitad en la pandemia. Y siento que voy tarde. ¿Algún consejo que puedan darme para no fracasar en el intento?
Pues justo esa pregunta, es la Inteligencia Artificial una herramienta que valoren los despachos actualmente?. Estoy armando mi portafolio para buscar donde hacer mis prácticas. En el último semestre tengo un proyecto (que considero es de los mejores) el cual los renders finales los hice con IA, tengo más de un año perfeccionando el uso de la IA para los renders, por lo que considero que los resultados son muy buenos, ni si quiera notarían que son hechos con IA.
Pues ahí entra mi duda, debería decir que están hechos con IA, o mejor lo dejo de lado y lo pongo como Lumion o D5, que tambien los manejo bien?
What is actually happening with AI-generated renders lately?
As an architect, I currently rely heavily on AI to enhance my SketchUp scenes. I set up the entire environment and textures first, then use AI specifically to elevate the realism by improving lighting and material quality. Honestly, the results are incredible.
However, I keep running into professionals who flat-out refuse to incorporate AI into any part of their workflow. I firmly believe it will be very difficult for AI to replace the actual creative and design process. But why are we so resistant to letting it replace a process (rendering) that isn't even an inherent or inseparable part of an architect's core work? Renders are a communication tool, but architectural design exists without them.
Just today, I saw a post from an architect who is anti-AI but decided to give it a shot. She generated renders of spaces she had previously designed in SketchUp and argued that even though the results were very good, she felt the images "lacked soul." She couldn't see them as a finished product because the manual process of tweaking every single setting was missing.
On the flip side, I also saw a post today from another architect who I know for a fact works with V-Ray, not AI. In his post about a completed project, the comments were flooded with people claiming it was AI and asking which tool he used. Everyone was convinced it wasn't a manual render.
So, it makes me wonder: Can we actually tell the difference? Are AI renders really that "bad," or is it just our egos trying to resist inevitable change?