E.g. väistää autoa/luodin
So, a learner would definitely begin to wonder, why not: väistää auton/luotia or both in par or accu.
I think I can kinda feel the difference, but not sure. 🫣
Vaikuttavaa sounds bit off to me as if overkilling with ylätyyli :D
>Fiksuilla ihmisillä on omat varasuunnitelmat sen varalta, että valtio päättää heidän kohtalostaan heidän puolestaan.
How will the meaning change if the sentence written: Fiksuilla ihmisillä on omat varasuunnitelmat sen varalta, että valtio päättää heidän kohtalosta puolestaan?
I am not sure if the original text is grammatically correct. It's from an AI bot. However, I cannot NOT see the repetition of "heidän" and the "-aan" forms, which is why I am here. :D
This might have been asked here many times before, but a quick search didn't give me any results. So, here's a question.
It's nighttime, and you go to the balcony. You say, "Aika lämmin" or "aika lämmintä". What's the difference?
Same here: Täällä on lämmin vs lämmintä. On lämmintä/lämmin ulkona.
Would I be wrong to think this way:
lämmintä = It's warm in general. lämmin = It's warm here on the balcony?
Thanks in advance! :D
I have often heard that the word "muija" is problematic to some people but I never got a clear answer why. Is a dialect? If so, in which part of Finland exactly is this word a problem 🤔
Elastinen sang, "mitä muijat, mikä boogie". Gettomasa sang, "mul on muijia stadissa"
So far so good?
I have always struggled to remember how to read symbols aloud.
And other important symbols as examples, if possible! Thanks.
A relevant link or even just the words would suffice, as I can search for them online myself. :D
Makkarakastike on hyvää! I know this or I hope I know this one. However, "makkarakastike on parempi kuin kaalikeitto" or "onko makkarakastike parempi vai kaalikeitto" have nominative, not partitive.
Kaalikeitto on hyvää, mutta makkarakastike on parempi?
Can someone explain this to me? Thanks.
https://discord.com/invite/h5qqty7
Yllä on linkki opisuomea discord serveriin.
👉 Kuka tahansa voi liittyä ja lähteä
Itse yritän puhua VAIN suomea :D
(poistan tän postauksen, kun olen poistunut paikalta)
Can someone shed light on why the first one is in partitive?
Hän pettää tilaisuuden tullen vai tullessa? And how about tultaessa?
I’m confused about their meanings and usages.
Tullen = by coming, when coming? Tullessa = while coming, when it comes? Tultaessa = upon coming?
I’ve kind of understood that “tilaisuuden tullen” is correct or it's a phrase, but I don’t see why we can’t use “tullessa” instead. Obviously, one could compose a sentence using “tilaisuuden tultaessa” also and have the same meaning as with tullen or tullessa?
Koko suku on varkaita. Koko suku on rosvoja. Koko perhe on huijareita.
Vai
varas, rosvo, huijari?
I am trying to understand where it takes singular, plural, and possibly the partitive.
My own understanding from consulting whatever showed up in web searches is that "kiellettyä" or "sallittua" is "jaollinen" meaning it applies universally, whereas "kielletty" or "sallittu" applies to a specific place, case, or people only. So, yeah, that's how it goes!
Mielipide?
>pahimpina ylityöaikoina on tienannut yli neljää donaa pariin viikkoon
I often encounter situations where I need to decide between e.g. parissa viikossa and pariin viikkoon. What is the grammar rule or logic behind choosing one over the other?
In this example, I suppose both pariin viikkoon and parissa viikossa work, but are there specific grammar rules that dictate which one to use and in what circumstances?
Another example: En ole nähnyt häntä pariin viikkoon / pariksi viikoksi / parissa viikossa.
What distinguishes these two terms? The one found in Wiktionary (sen verran) is the standard version, while the other, which isn't listed there, appears to be more colloquial. Is that accurate?
