u/Quatfit

Hi everyone,

I'm an AI founder currently exploring the idea of building an AI Personal Computer, and I'd really value the perspectives in this community.

Looking at the current AI landscape, it feels like we're surrounded by increasingly capable chatbots. They're great at answering questions and helping with tasks, but I often wonder whether that's what people ultimately want.

Do we need another chatbot, or do we need AI that genuinely understands us over time?

The idea I'm exploring is an AI system that runs primarily on personal hardware, prioritizes privacy, remembers what you choose to share, adapts to your workflows, and becomes a long-term assistant instead of just another app or website.

Some of the principles I'm thinking about are:

• Privacy-first, with as much local processing as possible.
• Memory that helps rather than forgetting every conversation.
• Personalization that evolves with the user.
• Fast, low-latency interactions without relying entirely on the cloud.
• An experience that feels like your own AI, not just access to someone else's service.

I'd especially love to hear perspectives from women working in AI, research, engineering, product, design, or anyone who uses AI extensively.

Some questions I'd love your thoughts on:

• Would you ever consider buying an AI Personal Computer?
• What would make it genuinely useful instead of just another AI gadget?
• How important are privacy and local AI to you?
• What frustrations do you have with today's AI assistants?
• If you could design your ideal AI companion, what would it do differently?

I'm not here to promote anything, I genuinely want to understand how people think about the future of personal AI before building further.

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and learning from your perspectives.

Hi everyone,

I'm an AI founder currently exploring the idea of building an AI Personal Computer, and I'd really value the perspectives in this community.

Looking at the current AI landscape, it feels like we're surrounded by increasingly capable chatbots. They're great at answering questions and helping with tasks, but I often wonder whether that's what people ultimately want.

Do we need another chatbot, or do we need AI that genuinely understands us over time?

The idea I'm exploring is an AI system that runs primarily on personal hardware, prioritizes privacy, remembers what you choose to share, adapts to your workflows, and becomes a long-term assistant instead of just another app or website.

Some of the principles I'm thinking about are:

• Privacy-first, with as much local processing as possible.
• Memory that helps rather than forgetting every conversation.
• Personalization that evolves with the user.
• Fast, low-latency interactions without relying entirely on the cloud.
• An experience that feels like your own AI, not just access to someone else's service.

I'd especially love to hear perspectives from women working in AI, research, engineering, product, design, or anyone who uses AI extensively.

Some questions I'd love your thoughts on:

• Would you ever consider buying an AI Personal Computer?
• What would make it genuinely useful instead of just another AI gadget?
• How important are privacy and local AI to you?
• What frustrations do you have with today's AI assistants?
• If you could design your ideal AI companion, what would it do differently?

I'm not here to promote anything, I genuinely want to understand how people think about the future of personal AI before building further.

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and learning from your perspectives.

I've been thinking a lot about where AI is heading, and honestly, I feel like we're reaching a point where every company is racing to build a better chatbot. They're getting smarter every few months, but they're still mostly tools that answer questions.

That made me wonder...

Do people actually want another chatbot, or do they want something that genuinely understands them?

I'm currently working on the idea of an AI Personal Computer. Not just a PC with AI pre-installed, but a personal AI system that lives with you, learns your preferences (with your permission), remembers what matters, runs locally for privacy, and becomes more like a long-term companion than a website you open in a browser.

Imagine having an AI that:

• Knows how you work and adapts over time.
• Understands your projects instead of starting from scratch every conversation.
• Works even without relying entirely on the cloud.
• Keeps your personal data on your own hardware.
• Can become the central interface for your work, learning, creativity, and daily life.

The vision isn't to replace ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or any other model. Those are amazing products. The vision is to build something more personal, where the AI feels like your computer rather than someone else's service.

Looking at the current market, subscriptions are piling up, privacy concerns are growing, and most AI products still feel transactional. You ask a question, get an answer, and move on.

But what if your computer actually knew you?

I'm still in the early stages and trying to validate whether people even want something like this before investing years into building it.

So I'd love some honest feedback:

• Would you ever buy an AI Personal Computer?
• How much would you realistically pay for it?
• Would you prefer a one-time hardware purchase, a subscription, or a combination of both?
• What features would make you choose it over just opening ChatGPT or another AI service?
• What's missing from today's AI assistants that you wish existed?

I'm not looking for compliments, I'm looking for criticism, ideas, and real opinions. If this sounds like a terrible idea, tell me why. If it sounds exciting, tell me what would make it a product you'd actually spend your own money on.

I'd genuinely love to hear what everyone thinks.

We're the team behind Quatfit AI and we've just completed another round of benchmark evaluations for Quatfit 12B.

The attached results compare Quatfit against GPT-5.5 XHigh, Claude Fable 5 Max, Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Pro, and MiniMax M3 across 25 benchmarks.

Some results:

• HLE: 99.2%
• GPQA: 98.7%
• MMLU-Pro: 98.3%
• FrontierCode Diamond: 98.9%
• OSWorld: 98.9%
• MT-Bench: 99.1%
• Arena-Hard: 98.7%
• LongMemEval: 98.6%

A few benchmarks remain challenging for us:

• ARC-AGI: 83.4%
• AIME 2026: 76.7%
• SWE-Bench Verified: 75.0%

We're sharing this because we want scrutiny, not praise.

The AI community has seen many benchmark claims over the past few years, and skepticism is healthy. We would appreciate feedback from researchers, engineers, benchmark maintainers, and power users.

Questions for the community:

1. Which independent benchmarks would you trust most?
2. What real-world evaluations matter more than benchmark scores?
3. What evidence would convince you that a new AI company deserves attention?
4. Would you be interested in a public evaluation program?

Our goal is not to win benchmark charts. Our goal is to build an AI system that is genuinely useful in reasoning, coding, agents, memory, multimodal understanding, and human interaction.

We're happy to answer technical questions and receive criticism.

https://preview.redd.it/xvxfaimfj78h1.png?width=1536&format=png&auto=webp&s=4f73e734e22aad86a7f98e428b382899b4365dca

We're the team behind Quatfit AI and we've just completed another round of benchmark evaluations for Quatfit 12B.

The attached results compare Quatfit against GPT-5.5 XHigh, Claude Fable 5 Max, Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Pro, and MiniMax M3 across 25 benchmarks.

Some results:

• HLE: 99.2%
• GPQA: 98.7%
• MMLU-Pro: 98.3%
• FrontierCode Diamond: 98.9%
• OSWorld: 98.9%
• MT-Bench: 99.1%
• Arena-Hard: 98.7%
• LongMemEval: 98.6%

A few benchmarks remain challenging for us:

• ARC-AGI: 83.4%
• AIME 2026: 76.7%
• SWE-Bench Verified: 75.0%

We're sharing this because we want scrutiny, not praise.

The AI community has seen many benchmark claims over the past few years, and skepticism is healthy. We would appreciate feedback from researchers, engineers, benchmark maintainers, and power users.

Questions for the community:

1. Which independent benchmarks would you trust most?
2. What real-world evaluations matter more than benchmark scores?
3. What evidence would convince you that a new AI company deserves attention?
4. Would you be interested in a public evaluation program?

Our goal is not to win benchmark charts. Our goal is to build an AI system that is genuinely useful in reasoning, coding, agents, memory, multimodal understanding, and human interaction.

We're happy to answer technical questions and receive criticism.

https://preview.redd.it/bfp31qxlj78h1.png?width=1536&format=png&auto=webp&s=91bf6970cab5465fc8cfa1bff94f0bd19edf0fbb