u/R7-7

Image 1 — Part 2: Following up on our manganese exploration - 3D subsurface mapping of secondary target (32% Mn)
Image 2 — Part 2: Following up on our manganese exploration - 3D subsurface mapping of secondary target (32% Mn)
Image 3 — Part 2: Following up on our manganese exploration - 3D subsurface mapping of secondary target (32% Mn)
Image 4 — Part 2: Following up on our manganese exploration - 3D subsurface mapping of secondary target (32% Mn)
Image 5 — Part 2: Following up on our manganese exploration - 3D subsurface mapping of secondary target (32% Mn)
Image 6 — Part 2: Following up on our manganese exploration - 3D subsurface mapping of secondary target (32% Mn)

Part 2: Following up on our manganese exploration - 3D subsurface mapping of secondary target (32% Mn)

Hi everyone,

following up on our previous post, I’d like to share the latest scan results and 3D surface visualizations from the next phase of our ongoing manganese exploration work. These are based on our recent data and field checks.

​Key Parameters & Field Observations:

  • ​Survey Grid: Data integrated across an extended regional grid (130m × 210m).
  • ​Scan & Anomaly Data: Our 3D scans indicate clear anomaly patterns and consistent subsurface continuation in this section.
  • ​Target Zone (Vein Bounds): The secondary vein structure measures roughly 57m × 45m, mapped at a depth of 24m to 27m underground, with an average grade of ~32% Mn.
  • ​Depth Progression: Current data shows this vein continuing deeper with an increasing grade trend as it goes down. We plan to scan and map the deeper sections in our upcoming phases.

​All spatial coordinates and sensitive metadata have been removed for site privacy. I would really appreciate any technical thoughts or feedback from fellow members on these scan models!

u/R7-7 — 11 days ago
▲ 7 r/geophysics+1 crossposts

Field Validation & 3D Anomaly Modeling for Manganese Exploration (100m × 150m Grid)

Sharing field overlay data, trench validation, and 3D surface visualizations from our ongoing manganese ore exploration project.

​Key Parameters & Field Observations:

  • ​Survey Grid: 100m x 150m high-resolution data collection area.
  • ​Anomaly Response: High magnetic/resistivity contrast ranging from -4000 to +14000 units, indicating strong sub-surface continuity.
  • ​Trenching Validation: An open-cut trench (61m x 10m, 21m deep) was excavated directly along the primary anomaly trend to verify surface expression.
  • ​Target Zone (Vein Bounds): Confirmed vein structure approximately 30m x 22m spanning depth intervals between 19m - 24m with an average grade of ~31% Mn.

​All spatial metadata and coordinates have been removed for site confidentiality. I would love to hear feedback from the community regarding these 3D surface models and anomaly interpretations!

u/R7-7 — 16 days ago