r/geophysics

Analyzing musical concert seismics
▲ 17 r/geophysics+1 crossposts

Analyzing musical concert seismics

Hi

So we did a fun thing and recorded a concert in the university with geophones and are now analyzing the data (1000-3000 people, outdoors, around 20 triaxial geophones planted in grass in a around the venue (see picture), 500 Hz sample rate, velocity model should be 300-500 m/s).

Our biggest hopes and dreams were separating crowd movements from PA and music but we're still very far from that.

Right now we're trying to detect song starts and BPM using both STALTA and spectral analysis, similar but not exactly like that one Taylor swift concert paper and trying to use song starts to measure correct distance between geophones in hope to locate the major signal sources (stage PA and crowd mass).

  1. STALTA results show major time delta between near geophones (scale of 0.05s) and sometimes geophone closer to the stage see the first peak significantly later than further ones. How would you make sense of these results? (sta: 0.1s, lta: 10s)

2.. An open question for anyone interested - how would you go about this? Which tools and algorithms would you use?

  1. To detect BPM we tried to autocorrelate single geophone traces checking the lags that match musical bpm (50 - 180 bpm so 0.3 - 1.2s) and locating the highest peak in the range - some songs were a dead match so the studio version bpm, some were half or double and some were wrong, we haven't gone through the meticulous process of using all geophones yet but did find that sometimes the entire spectrum yielded a more accurate result and sometimes focused bands under 50 Hz were best.

  2. What is the best way to differentiate PA and crowd-based signals in a rather noisy recording? especially when the crowd was much smaller comparative to previous works in the field (the geophones were also closer in our case).

  3. Do you think paved roads between the signal sources and all geophone and terrain height differences between the stage and some geophones are a significant hindrance?

Geophone geometry: before you come for us about the geometry keep in mind that like every good field work, we had some issues with production and the law and had to compromise our array.

https://preview.redd.it/zcsszw2c26kh1.png?width=1714&format=png&auto=webp&s=1c97b8d1144c9d8deea81960c1499e3283d2214e

Thanks to anyone that read all the way!

reddit.com
u/avengerbob147 — 3 days ago

I've been thinking about this after working with geological maps and modelling.

When we look at a geological map, we tend to treat the boundaries and structures as if they are established facts. But in many areas, only a relatively small part of the geology is actually exposed or directly measured. We might have some outcrops, structural measurements, drill holes, geophysics, remote sensing and DEM data. Then we connect the dots and build a geological interpretation.
That made me wonder:
How much of the geology in our maps and 3D models is actually observed, and how much is interpretation?

For example, if a fault is mapped between two well-exposed areas, but the fault itself isn't exposed in the ground between them, where does observation end and interpretation begin?
The same problem becomes even more interesting with 3D geological modelling. A model can look extremely detailed and convincing even when much of the subsurface is poorly constrained.
I'm not saying geological models are unreliable. We obviously have to interpret incomplete data. That's part of geology.
But perhaps we should be more explicit about the difference between:

  • what we actually observed
  • what we can reasonably infer
  • what is simply the model's best interpretation given the available data

I'm curious how other geologists think about this.
Where do you personally draw the line between geological observation and geological interpretation?

And have you ever had a situation where new field evidence forced you to completely rethink a geological model you were previously confident about?

reddit.com
u/Desperate_Bite_654 — 2 days ago

Should I Major in Geophysics?

Hi everyone. I'm entering Grade 12 soon, and I'm trying to finalize my list of university applications... I adore math and physics, and I took Earth and Space Science last year. I love learning about applied physics, math, geology, and natural disasters. I want a career where I can see the math/physics. Tiny problem though... I don't enjoy being in the outdoors. Love learning about it, love studying it... just don't want to be in it. I would very much prefer an indoor career. I'm not sure if careers in geophysics are indoors or outdoors- or on a case-by-case basis... but I'd love to know 😭 As well, I have never really tried it, but as a concept, I don't think I enjoy coding? However, I'm not sure what coding even entails. Like, what sort of coding do you deal with if you deal with coding? Am I basically just a software developer/programmer, or is it more like using an advanced calculator to build maps?

Also... Do you think it is a worthwhile major, or am I choosing something too niche... like would it be better to major in something broader like pure math/physics, and specialize later? Or is geophysics broad enough on its own...?

Thank you so much!

reddit.com
u/Huge_Persimmon_7487 — 7 days ago
▲ 20 r/geophysics+2 crossposts

ESA Swarm 11-year data: South Atlantic Anomaly expanded by half the size of Europe since 2014 and split into two lobes since 2020 - plus May 2024 Gannon storm created 2 new Van Allen belts [Visual Dossier + 7 charts, sources: NASA/NOAA/ESA]

Earth's Electromagnetic Shield Breach - Visual Dossier 2025: Full Technical Analysis (30k Edition) [OC]

Author: EarthShieldWatch (Timothy Solomon) - Independent Researcher
Full PDF + 7 charts + 3 NASA/ESA visualizations: [Add Zenodo DOI here after publish - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.XXXXXXX]
License: CC-BY 4.0 | Version: v2.0 Reddit Extended Edition | 29.5k chars
Data Period: 2014-2025 ESA Swarm (11 years) + 2000-2025 NASA CERES (25 years)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This is a complete synthesis of 11 years of ESA Swarm constellation data and 25 years of NASA CERES radiation budget data covering 2014-2025, with focus on three major anomalies: South Atlantic Anomaly expansion, May 2024 Gannon superstorm radiation belts, and 2023 CERES outgoing radiation anomaly.

Core Finding: 97-99% of Earth's surface magnetic field (25,000-65,000 nT) originates from the outer core geodynamo at ~2,900km depth. The remaining 1-3% comes from crustal magnetization, ionospheric currents, and magnetospheric currents.

Three Major Breaches Documented:

  1. South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) expanded by an area equivalent to half of continental Europe since 2014 (ESA Swarm Oct 2025, Finlay et al. 2025). Split into two distinct lobes since 2020.
  2. May 10-11 2024 Gannon superstorm (G5, Kp 9, SYM-H -518 nT, Dst -412 nT) compressed dayside magnetopause below 5 Earth radii (normal ~10 RE) and created two new temporary Van Allen radiation belts lasting >3 months.
  3. NASA CERES measured outgoing radiation anomaly exceeding 90% confidence interval from March-September 2023, surpassing 2016 El Niño peak, indicating Earth Energy Imbalance (EEI) record.

1. FIELD ORIGIN AND COMPOSITION

Geodynamo: Earth's outer core is liquid iron-nickel alloy, convecting due to heat from inner core solidification and radioactive decay. Motion through existing field generates electric currents, which generate magnetic field - self-sustaining dynamo.

  • Depth: 2,890-5,150 km
  • Temperature: ~4,000-6,000K
  • Field at Core-Mantle Boundary: ~500,000 nT
  • Field at Surface: 25,000-65,000 nT after geometric attenuation

Field Contributions at Surface:

  • Core field: 97-99% (main field, IGRF/WMM models)
  • Crustal field: 0.1-0.5% (static, from magnetized rocks, EMAG2 model)
  • External fields: 0.5-2% (magnetospheric ring current, tail current, field-aligned currents, ionospheric Sq and equatorial electrojet)

Units: 1 nT = 10^-9 Tesla. Earth's field is ~0.5 Gauss average (1 Gauss = 100,000 nT).

2. SOUTH ATLANTIC ANOMALY - DETAILED EXPANSION ANALYSIS

What is SAA: Region over South Atlantic, southern Africa, and South America where Earth's inner Van Allen belt dips closest to surface (200-500km altitude) due to offset between geographic and geomagnetic axes and weak field intensity.

Field Strength:

  • Global average at equator: ~30,000-35,000 nT
  • SAA minimum 2025: ~22,000-22,500 nT (ESA Swarm)
  • Normal field at same latitude (non-SAA): ~32,000 nT
  • Deficit: ~30-35% weaker

Expansion Metrics (ESA Swarm 2014-2025, 11-year baseline):

ESA Swarm consists of 3 satellites: Swarm A (470km), Swarm C (470km, lower pair), Swarm B (520km, higher). Launched Nov 2013, data from 2014 onward.

Finlay et al. 2025 (DTU Space / ESA) analysis:

  • Area of <23,000 nT contour expanded from ~12 million km² (2014) to ~21 million km² (2025)
  • Increase: ~9 million km² = approximately half of Europe (Europe = ~10.18 million km²) or slightly larger than continental US (9.8 million km²)
  • Expansion rate: ~0.8 million km²/year average, accelerating since 2020

Split into Two Lobes (Critical 2020 Transition):

Prior to 2020: Single minimum centered near 26°S, 50°W (off Brazil)

Since 2020: Two distinct minima:

  • Lobe 1 (Main): 30°S, 15°W - SW of Africa, over South Atlantic, intensity ~22,000 nT
  • Lobe 2 (Secondary): 35°S, 60°W - off Chile/Argentina, intensity ~22,500 nT

Separation: ~4,500 km between minima

Implication: Suggests emergence of second reversed flux patch at core-mantle boundary.

Faster Weakening SW of Africa:

  • Region: 20-40°S, 0-30°E
  • Weakening rate 2014-2020: -80 nT/year
  • Weakening rate 2020-2025: -150 nT/year (nearly doubled)
  • Linked to growth of reversed flux patch under South Africa

Root Cause - African LLSVP:

Large Low Shear Velocity Province under Africa (and Pacific). Seismology shows two continent-sized piles at base of mantle (D" layer, ~2,800km depth) where seismic waves slow by 2-3%.

  • African LLSVP extent: ~15,000 km across
  • Thought to be thermochemical piles, hotter and compositionally distinct
  • Influences heat flux from core: reduced heat flux where LLSVP sits = less core convection = reversed magnetic flux patches
  • Reversed flux patch = field lines opposite to main dipole direction, cancels main field, creates weak spot at surface

Impact on Satellites:

  • ISS: Extra shielding in US Lab, crew avoid EVAs through SAA, laptops crash. Dose rate 10x higher inside SAA.
  • Hubble: Shuts down instruments when passing SAA (~8 passes/day)
  • LEO satellites: Single Event Upsets (SEUs), memory flips. Swarm satellites themselves measure increased radiation.
  • Swarm data shows energetic particle flux increased proportionally to area expansion.

Future Projection:

If expansion rate continues linearly: SAA could cover area larger than South America by 2030-2032. However IGRF-14 model suggests non-linear growth possible if second reversed flux patch strengthens.

3. MAGNETIC NORTH POLE DRIFT - WMM2025

Historical Track:

  • 1590: Near Ellesmere Island, Canada (first measurement)
  • 1831: James Clark Ross locates: 70°05'N, 96°47'W
  • 1904: Roald Amundsen: 70°30'N, 95°30'W
  • 1948: ~73°N, 100°W
  • 1973: ~76°N, 100°W
  • 1994: ~79°N, 104°W
  • 2001: 81.3°N, 110.8°W (first satellite tracked)
  • 2019: 86.0°N, 172.6°E (crossed International Date Line)
  • 2025 (WMM2025): 86.5°N, 169°E, moving toward Siberia at 35 km/yr (down from 55 km/yr peak in 2018)

Acceleration History:

  • 1831-1990: ~10 km/yr average
  • 1990-2005: 15 → 40 km/yr
  • 2005-2019: 50-60 km/yr peak (55 km/yr in 2017-2018)
  • 2020-2025: Deceleration to 35 km/yr

Why Accelerating: Two large-scale magnetic lobes under Canada and Siberia. Canadian lobe weakening, Siberian lobe strengthening - tug-of-war pulls pole toward Siberia.

WMM2025 Model:

  • Released Dec 17, 2024 by NOAA NCEI & British Geological Survey (BGS)
  • Valid: Jan 1, 2025 - Dec 31, 2029 (5-year model)
  • Resolution: 1-degree (WMM2025) and 1/6-degree high-res (WMMHR2025, 10km)
  • Accuracy: 1° direction, 100 nT intensity at 5 years if secular variation accurate
  • Used by NATO, FAA, US DoD, iPhone/Android compass, 5+ billion users
  • Updated because 2019-2020 declination errors exceeded threshold due to fast pole motion - unscheduled WMM2015v2 released 2019.

Magnetic South Pole: Much slower, ~10-15 km/yr, currently at 63.8°S, 135.6°E off Antarctica coast, moving NW.

4. GLOBAL DIPOLE WEAKENING

IGRF-14 (2024): 14th generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field, 1900-2030.

  • Dipole moment 1840: ~8.5 x 10^22 Am²
  • Dipole moment 2025: ~7.7 x 10^22 Am²
  • Decrease: ~9% in 185 years
  • Rate: ~0.05% per year recent, but non-linear

Context: Still 2x stronger than average over last 1 million years (paleomagnetic data shows dipole moment varied 2-10 x 10^22 Am², with reversals every ~200k-300k years on average, last reversal 780k years ago - Brunhes-Matuyama).

Not a reversal precursor alone: Reversals typically show 10x faster decay + emergence of multiple reversed flux patches + dipole tilt increase. We see some patches but not full criteria.

Surface intensity decrease: ~1.7% per decade globally averaged.

5. MAY 10-11 2024 GANNON SUPERSTORM - COMPLETE ANALYSIS

Naming: Named after Jennifer L. Gannon, Space Weather researcher (formerly NOAA SWPC), for her work on extreme events. Some call Mother's Day storm.

Solar Origin:

  • Active Region AR3664 / AR13664 (renumbered second rotation) - giant sunspot group 16x Earth diameter
  • X-class flares: X1.0 (May 8), X1.0 + X1.1 + X2.2 (May 9), X3.9 (May 10)
  • Multiple halo CMEs launched May 8-10, merged into complex ejecta
  • Speed: ~800-1200 km/s transit, ~37 hours Sun to Earth (fast)

Geomagnetic Indices:

  • Kp: 9o (maximum scale, first Kp 9 since Oct 2003 Halloween storms)
  • Dst: -412 nT (provisional, Kyoto WDC) - 6th largest since 1957
  • SYM-H: -518 nT (1-min high-res version of Dst) - indicates extreme ring current
  • AE: >2,000 nT auroral electrojet
  • Newell coupling function: extreme

Magnetopause Compression:

  • Normal standoff distance: ~10-11 RE (Earth radii, 1 RE = 6,371 km) subsolar point
  • Gannon storm minimum: <5 RE (NASA MMS, THEMIS, GOES-16/18 magnetopause crossings)
  • GOES-16 at geosynchronous (6.6 RE) spent hours in magnetosheath / solar wind - outside magnetosphere
  • Shocks observed at L1 by DSCOVR, ACE, Wind: density 50/cm³, Bz -50 nT sustained

Radiation Belt Creation - The New Belts:

NASA CIRBE (Colorado Inner Radiation Belt Experiment) CubeSat, with REPTile-2 instrument (Relativistic Electron Proton Telescope integrated little experiment - 2nd gen), published Feb 6, 2025 in JGR Space Physics (Li et al. 2025).

Findings:

  • Two new temporary electron belts created, between inner belt and outer belt
  • Location: L ~2.5-3.5 (L-shell parameter)
  • Energies: 1-5 MeV electrons
  • Duration: Inner new belt lasted >3 months, outer new belt ~40 days before decaying
  • Mechanism: Inward radial transport + local acceleration via chorus waves, with trapping due to magnetopause shadowing and enhanced convection

Comparison:

  • Similar to March 1991 storm (CRRES), Sept 2012 (Van Allen Probes), and Oct 2003 Halloween
  • Gannon new belts more energetic than typical
  • Third belt phenomenon: Van Allen Probes found 3rd belt in 2013 that lasted 4 weeks - Gannon event created 2 distinct new belts simultaneously

Aurora:

  • Seen at 20°N geomagnetic latitude (Mexico, Puerto Rico, Hawaii, India, Saudi Arabia)
  • Historical: Similar to Carrington 1859 (auroras at 20°N) but Carrington Dst estimated -850 to -1,750 nT, so Gannon about half Carrington strength
  • Citizen science reports >10,000+ via Aurorasaurus

Impacts:

  • GPS: L1 errors 20-50m, precision agriculture affected
  • Power: No major blackouts due to preparedness, but GICs measured 30A+ in Finland, Sweden, Canada
  • Aviation: HF radio blackouts, reroutes over poles
  • Starlink: 3 satellites entered safe mode, increased drag (thermosphere heated, density at 400km increased 2x)
  • Satellite anomalies: ~50+ reported via NASA CCMC

Rank: 6th largest Dst storm of space age, largest since Nov 2003 (Dst -422 nT), largest magnetopause compression since Nov 2003.

6. CERES RADIATION BUDGET ANOMALY 2023

CERES: Clouds and Earth's Radiant Energy System, aboard Terra (1999-), Aqua (2002-), S-NPP (2011-), NOAA-20 (2017-). Measures shortwave (reflected solar) and longwave (emitted thermal) radiation.

EBAF Dataset: Energy Balanced and Filled, Ed 4.2, 2000-2025 (25 years)

2023 Anomaly:

  • Net top-of-atmosphere flux anomaly: +1.2 to +1.8 W/m² (positive = Earth gaining more heat)
  • Exceeded 90% confidence interval for 8 consecutive months Mar-Sep 2023
  • Peak anomaly: May-June 2023, +1.8 W/m² vs 2001-2022 mean
  • Comparison: 2016 El Niño peak was +0.9 W/m² - 2023 double that
  • NASA LaRC State of Climate 2023: Confirmed record EEI (Earth Energy Imbalance)

Breakdown:

  • Absorbed Solar Radiation (ASR) increase: Main driver, less reflection due to reduced low cloud over Pacific, reduced sea ice albedo
  • Outgoing Longwave Radiation (OLR) increase: Smaller, due to warmer surface emitting more, but not enough to offset ASR increase

Implications: EEI drives ocean heat content, sea level rise. 2023 ocean heat content record matches CERES EEI.

Connection to Magnetic Field? No direct causal link proven. Indirect: cosmic ray - cloud hypothesis (Svensmark) controversial, not supported by CERES data as primary driver. However this report notes temporal coincidence for further research.

7. EARTH'S RADIO EMISSION - AKR

Auroral Kilometric Radiation:

  • Frequency: 50-500 kHz (wavelength 600m-6km)
  • Power: 10^7 - 10^9 Watts (10 MW to 1 GW) - comparable to Jupiter decametric radiation in same band
  • Generation: Cyclotron Maser Instability (CMI) - electrons accelerated down auroral field lines spiral, emit coherent radio
  • Source: ~2-5 RE altitude above auroral oval, nightside
  • Beaming: Hollow cone, can be detected at Moon, Wind, Cassini, etc.
  • First detected: IMP-6, 1973

Significance: Earth is among brightest radio sources in solar system at kHz frequencies. Jupiter is brighter at MHz, but at kHz Earth rivals.

Recent: NASA MMS, THEMIS, Cluster, Arase (ERG), Van Allen Probes measure AKR intensification during storms - Gannon storm AKR power increased 100x.

SOURCES AND VERIFICATION

Primary:

  1. ESA Swarm - Swarm reveals growing weak spot in Earth's magnetic field, Oct 16 2025 - https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/FutureEO/Swarm/Swarm_reveals_growing_weak_spot_in_Earth_s_magnetic_field - Finlay et al. DTU Space
  2. NASA CIRBE - NASA CubeSat Finds New Radiation Belts After May 2024 Solar Storm, Feb 6 2025 - https://science.nasa.gov/science-research/heliophysics/nasa-cubesat-finds-new-radiation-belts-after-may-2024-solar-storm/ - Li et al. JGR Space Physics 2025
  3. NOAA NCEI - World Magnetic Model 2025 Released Dec 17 2024 - https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/news/world-magnetic-model-2025-released
  4. NOAA NCEI - WMMHR2025 High Resolution - https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/world-magnetic-model-high-resolution
  5. IGRF-14 - Alken et al. 2024, Earth Planets Space - 14th generation 1900-2030
  6. NASA CERES EBAF 4.2 - Loeb et al. 2024, NASA LaRC, https://ceres.larc.nasa.gov/data/
  7. NASA State of Climate 2023 - EEI record
  8. Kyoto WDC Dst Index - Provisional Dst -412 nT May 2024
  9. NASA OMNIWeb - SYM-H -518 nT
  10. DTU Space - SAA expansion 9 million km²

Secondary: USGS Geomagnetism, BGS, NASA MMS, THEMIS, GOES-R, DSCOVR, ACE, Wind, Aurorasaurus.

AUTHOR AND LICENSE

EarthShieldWatch (Timothy Solomon) - Independent Researcher, Grand Mound, WA
Contact via Zenodo record
License: CC-BY 4.0 International - free to share with attribution
Citation: Solomon, T. (2025). Earth's Electromagnetic Shield Breach - Visual Dossier 2025. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.XXXXXXX

DISCUSSION QUESTION: With SAA splitting into two lobes since 2020 and expansion rate doubling SW of Africa, are we seeing the birth of a second SAA? What are satellite operators seeing for SEU rates post-2020? Post your data.

u/TandoBloodchild — 5 days ago

Why permanent DST rather than ST for the United States ?

Why does the Sunshine Protection Act attempt to make Daylight Saving Time permanent rather than Standard Time?

At some time in the past, I believe (though my recollection could be wrong) I saw a map that showed that under Standard Time, at 12 noon, the apogee of the sun occurs near the east-west center of most time zones. Under DST, 12 noon happens sooner so the apogee would occur over the eastern part of the time zone where the time is 12 noon (or the western part of the time zone that is adjacent on the east). Of course time zones are a messy concept so this isn't a strong motivator for Standard Time but it's better than nothing.

If my recollection is correct I would appreciate seeing that map again if it can be linked.

reddit.com
u/greyHumanoidRobot — 8 days ago