Why isn't active seismic used more in mining and exploration?
In the O&G world, active seismic is the "gold standard" dataset, you wouldn't dream of drilling without it. Yet, in mining, it still feels like a niche tool (this might be my bias).
I realise the structural complexity of hard rock environments is a different beast compared to the relatively "clean" layering of most oil and gas basins. That said, I’ve seen some phenomenal hard rock structural models lately that were built off active seismic, and the detail is hard to argue with.
I’m curious to hear from those of you in the field:
- If you’ve used it, did the resolution and models justify the spend?
- If you’re not using it or don't see the value, is it purely a cost-to-benefit issue, or is their some other issue?
Why aren't we seeing this adopted more broadly across the industry?