I had surgery with a master surgeon in minimally invasive surgery... I'm feeling frustrated that the endo is back again
I'm almost positive that the surgeon i saw is really the best you can get at least through insurance. I've seen some people say though that even endo excision specialists can sometimes not be as good as they claim. She has won all kinds of awards, did a fellowship in migs surgery with the DaVinci robot for a year, and has been awarded a master surgeon by the SRC. Is it possible that she's just not as good as it seems to imply?
How long after your expert endo specialist surgery did you get symptoms again?
I had my first surgery in February 2025 and she removed stage 2. Because of pain and an ultrasound that showed a concerning polyp I went back for another one September 2025. She removed stage 2 endo again. She also removed uterine fibroids and said the polyp wasn't there. Well the hysterscopy caused me to get an infection by an overgrowth of ureaplasma parvum which causes inflammation too. It caused itching and burning and done think it increases risk of miscarriage so we took a break from ttc again.
Now here I am like 9 months later and I'm in pain, not pregnant, and looking to get a hysterscopy only this time to remove yet another polyp (though this one is less concerning but my reg obgyn still thinks it needs to go if it's still there after my period).
I'm not sure that I'm ready for another lap. But when I am i can't help wonder if my surgeon just isn't as good as she says she is?
She's told me that without getting on bc it's much more likely it will regrow quickly and that she really prefers to place iuds during surgery or to do lap before ivf. But I've seen some people claim to have surgery and then not use bc and be fine for years!
I just am not sure what to think about all of this.