
Blind comparison of compressed fine textures
I was looking into a comparison of several encoder and setting and checking how they compare in image quality. One of the interesting parts is how they handle areas with fine textures. I was interested in how you would rate them relative to each other if you don't see the reference uncompressed image.
Columns correspond to encoders that I used. All images come from a mirrorless camera, they were exported from RAW to PNG, then downsized to 50% of linear dimension and then compressed to 0.6 bpp. At the end, I cropped selected parts and put them into one image.
I will reveal what encoders I used later, but there definitely is libjxl in the comparison. Feel free to share your guesses which encoders were used!