r/flatearth

Some days ago I had an argument with a flatearther under a video on youtube showing 24 hours of sun on antarctica. He said all the thing was made in a studio of nasa and all of the people in it were liars. I showed the paths that were passed through by trans antarctica expedition in 1990 that went from one side to other side of antarctica, he claimed all fake. I showed the circumnavigationg of antarctica by Lisa Blair and apparently it was also fake.

I asked how he knows about 24 hours of sun on north pole, he said lots of people experienced it, lots of photos taken there, and it happens also in flat earth model. I said what if all those photos were fake as well and all those people telling a day of daylight was lies, he said I became nonsense and stopped answering.

My conclusion is that he saw how it doesnt make any sense and sounds stupid the idea of so many people faking something over an observation which he also accepts. Indeed, all the things he says to cover antarctica observation can also be made for north pole since he never went there himself. And all of his garbage explanations sound very stupid because they are stupid. It baffles me how he cannot does the same reasoning for south pole as he does for north pole. So apparenly they shut the logic off when their belief starts.

Current episode, guest in the Oval Office. It’s not him, but I had to do a double take!

I wonder how a flatearth physics department would look like. No gravity no space no gravitational waves, local sun god knows why floating around, some moon along with it, a firmament god knows how far and made of what, it looks like all it requires is a bunch of youtube videos and you graduate.

That would be an easy way of getting a degree and fun as hell I think

As a sigma tool fan flat earther I am presented with heaps of "evidence" provided by NPC f#id loving globers, like "how could sunsets work on the flat earth model" and " the flat earth model doesn't work with current geology" and other such things like that, they ask me to prove these "plot holes" in my righteous flat earth model, so my answer is?

NO! 😅

Checkmate globelcels! lemme guess, some globcel YouTuber paid off by NASA spoon-fed you that processed opinion, I learnt my righteous ways from listening to tool and calling everyone that disagrees with me a "globetard".

#justglobiethings

s/

Dear Flat Earth Fellows,
I know you explain falling with buoyance(still not tells why things go “down” but I assume you have some reason) but how do you explain flying? Flying of planes, birds, insects? They are on ground when they are still but fly when they want, what makes a plane fly which is surely heavier than air.

Globers explain it by creating a greater than 9.81 m/sec^2 so planes gain lift but since there is no gravity how does that work? And what is that 9.81m/sec^2 that is measured on accelarating falling objects?

AND EVERYBODY SAID IT WAS IMPOSSABLE