u/Shot_Ostrich3281

In other areas such as asbestos, or empires, we readily accept the logic that it was a different time and understandings were very different to what they are now. Why then, are leftist “activists” convincing so many that the various adoption schemes of past governments were malicious, and scandalous?

The extent of any “coercion” is very much unproven, and it should quite frankly be known NOW just as then, that it was in the serious interest of child welfare.

Nothing can change that the traditional family unit is the ONLY safe and sustainable way to raise children, and that fatherless households should be avoided for the sake of everyone involved.

It’s clear that men of all cultures, with varying degrees of legitimacy, do not believe in the authority of women due to innate physical differences. While we’re prevented from basing other interactions on that logic, in policing it presents a clear practical issue that is contributing to rising crime.

People have come to take for granted that execution is somehow barbaric, or outdated. This is the result of conspiracy by politicians to eliminate the most effective deterrent and just punishment for the crimes they enable and perpetrate. But yes, it is ALSO because so many people simply cannot stomach the idea.

Well both of these things, you’re not allowed to say, are completely INVALID reasons to disqualify one form of punishment over another. One for the sake of the corrupt, the other the weak.

It is the most appropriate punishment for the most heinous crimes and by preventing it, that has been the cause that single most undermines the very idea of punishment in this country. It is also the cause of all treason by civil servants and the political class, who are already protected by fear of reciprocity by their peers.

You may wonder why, despite the strong words, the encouraging policies, why it feels so suspiciously like nothing will be done, by anyone?

It’s because we know, subconsciously, that the ONLY thing that should be done has been taken off the table. That’s the great trick that the uni party and their supporters have played and fallen for themselves. Breaking that taboo is not “a bit much” or “obviously not the priority”, it is essential.

To think that the most obvious reaction to a mass rape should be “immigration policy” instead of ultimate punishment, that’s the real way society has fallen.

The last few days have to be a wake up call to moderates on this sub that you can’t peddle any part of the narrative and expect brits to buy it!

There never was a positive story of integration among any community that insists on keeping its costume, values and ideologies in public, whether they wear a headdress or a skullcap. Even less when those people fail to restrain themselves from innocent people.

Every narrative peddled is another vote gone to restore.

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

This party is had the stones to get real on immigration, on culture and on values and won big.

But it’s concerning to see only two days removed that so many low effort, low value people who had a hand in making labour so unserious over the years are attaching themselves to this party. More concerning then to see so many of you now preaching the same “tolerance”, “big tent” politics that we have been rejecting for years.

We need to start to see serious place putting and a rejection of the economically inactive, economically illiterate and chancing people who are asking us for an unearned reward off the back of productive tax payers.

No matter the leftists jokes about our donors, Nigel’s international connections are exactly the high value people we should extend hospitality to, not off the boaters OR former miners who have had decades to make something of themselves wherever they’re from.

The credentials of the party on culture and values are top notch but I’ve noticed there’s a big stigma attached to discussion of an ethnically homogeneous country, which is highly desirable to swathes of the people(see Great Yarmouth results).

Even if you are an ethnic minority, can you not see any merit to discussing how a future for a more traditional ethnic population can be productive for the party policy?

I’m immensely proud of the monumental successes in challenging the corruption of the countries moral fabric and ancient values.

However, we need to use this entrance into the mainstream to realise some necessary truths and re posture publicly to match what everyone has known privately for so long.

Zia may not walk that walk anymore and seems to be a very decent man, but he openly identifies under the name of a belief system we have proudly declared incompatible with our nation, it’s a name he could easily have dropped at any time and needs to if he’ll stay a true representative of this movement.

Don’t argue it’s good politics to let this go, this party is supposed to have grown beyond past lazy identity politics and the locals are proof.