u/Signal-Camel6007

I’ve always felt chess analysis tools tell you what the best move is, but not how humans think about the move.

So I built a platform where players can annotate moves with explanations like:

“This move fixes the weak dark squares”

“I traded because my knight was worse than the bishop”

“I missed the back-rank issue here”

Other users can upvote/downvote annotations so the best explanations rise to the top.

The idea is to build a community knowledge base of human chess reasoning instead of just engine evals.

Would love feedback from serious players.

check it out at:

chessdecoded.vercel.app

a chess analysis tool focused on human reasoning instead of engine lines

I’ve always felt chess analysis tools tell you what the best move is, but not how humans think about the move.

So I built a platform where players can annotate moves with explanations like:

“This move fixes the weak dark squares”

“I traded because my knight was worse than the bishop”

“I missed the back-rank issue here”

Other users can upvote/downvote annotations so the best explanations rise to the top.

The idea is to build a community knowledge base of human chess reasoning instead of just engine evals.

Would love feedback from serious players.

check it out at:

chessdecoded.vercel.app

I’ve always felt chess analysis tools tell you what the best move is, but not how humans think about the move.

So I built a platform where players can annotate moves with explanations like:

“This move fixes the weak dark squares”

“I traded because my knight was worse than the bishop”

“I missed the back-rank issue here”

Other users can upvote/downvote annotations so the best explanations rise to the top.

The idea is to build a community knowledge base of human chess reasoning instead of just engine evals.

Would love feedback from serious players.

check it out at:

chessdecoded.vercel.app

I’ve always felt chess analysis tools tell you what the best move is, but not how humans think about the move.

So I built a platform where players can annotate moves with explanations like:

“This move fixes the weak dark squares”

“I traded because my knight was worse than the bishop”

“I missed the back-rank issue here”

Other users can upvote/downvote annotations so the best explanations rise to the top.

The idea is to build a community knowledge base of human chess reasoning instead of just engine evals.

Would love feedback from serious players.

check it out at:

chessdecoded.vercel.app

I’ve always felt chess analysis tools tell you what the best move is, but not how humans think about the move.

So I built a platform where players can annotate moves with explanations like:

“This move fixes the weak dark squares”

“I traded because my knight was worse than the bishop”

“I missed the back-rank issue here”

Other users can upvote/downvote annotations so the best explanations rise to the top.

The idea is to build a community knowledge base of human chess reasoning instead of just engine evals.

Would love feedback from serious players.

check it out at:

chessdecoded.vercel.app

I’ve always felt chess analysis tools tell you what the best move is, but not how humans think about the move.

So I built a platform where players can annotate moves with explanations like:

“This move fixes the weak dark squares”

“I traded because my knight was worse than the bishop”

“I missed the back-rank issue here”

Other users can upvote/downvote annotations so the best explanations rise to the top.

The idea is to build a community knowledge base of human chess reasoning instead of just engine evals.

Would love feedback from serious players.

check it out at:

chessdecoded.vercel.app

I’ve always felt chess analysis tools tell you what the best move is, but not how humans think about the move.

So I built a platform where players can annotate moves with explanations like:

“This move fixes the weak dark squares”

“I traded because my knight was worse than the bishop”

“I missed the back-rank issue here”

Other users can upvote/downvote annotations so the best explanations rise to the top.

The idea is to build a community knowledge base of human chess reasoning instead of just engine evals.

Would love feedback from serious players.

check it out at:

chessdecoded.vercel.app

I’ve always felt chess analysis tools tell you what the best move is, but not how humans think about the move.

So I built a platform where players can annotate moves with explanations like:

“This move fixes the weak dark squares”

“I traded because my knight was worse than the bishop”

“I missed the back-rank issue here”

Other users can upvote/downvote annotations so the best explanations rise to the top.

The idea is to build a community knowledge base of human chess reasoning instead of just engine evals.

Would love feedback from serious players.

check it out at:

chessdecoded.vercel.app