u/Signal-Specific-1704

B.C.’s Eby compares condo plan to ‘liquidation’ at below construction costs. No details are released.

B.C.’s Eby compares condo plan to ‘liquidation’ at below construction costs. No details are released.

The provincial establishment in B.C is out here promising "liquidation pricing" for new condos, but Eby is remarkably short on details.

He’s comparing this to a fire sale, but consider this: during the major condo crash in Miami (a city with a much more diversified economy those targeted cities in B.C) prices plummeted by 43%. If this isn't just a taxpayer-funded bailout for developers, are we actually going to see those kinds of price cuts in B.C.? Or is "liquidation" just a buzzword to sell a plan that doesn't actually pencil out?

globalnews.ca
u/Signal-Specific-1704 — 2 days ago

Poilievre asks Parliament to probe B.C. 'condo bailout,' says it prevents 'a price correction' | CBC News

Regardless of personal political views, Pierre Poilievre has become the first major federal leader to explicitly state that restoring housing affordability requires a market price correction. By opposing a government plan to buy unsold properties, which he argues acts as a "condo bailout" that sustains artificially high developer prices—he is effectively pushing for the market to drop.

For those priced out of the market, a federal leader openly advocating for lower prices rather than government intervention is a significant policy shift and a breakthrough for affordability advocates. We need MPs from across the political spectrum to start saying the quiet part out loud: the only way to meaningfully restore housing affordability for this generation is through a decline in home prices.

Popul-ation decline alone won't make enough of an impact, salaries will not catch up with the growth of prices, and we are nowhere near building enough new homes to close the gap. A true price correction is the only path forward.

cbc.ca
u/Signal-Specific-1704 — 6 days ago

Canadian government accused of bias against renters in signature housing legislation. At least 103 MPs or their spouse are landlords

Breakdown by party:

-Liberal Party: 52 MPs (including roughly a third of the cabinet) 
-Conservative Party: 45 MPs (including party leader Pierre Poilievre and 44 others)
-Bloc Québécois: 6 MPs 
-New Democratic Party (NDP): 1 MP
-Greens: 1MP
——

Highly notable parasites:

-Gregor Robertson (Housing Minister): Owns a portfolio valued at over $10 million, including a Vancouver penthouse and properties near Tofino and Squamish.

-Lena Metlege Diab (Imm Minister): Owns or co-owns 14 rental units in Halifax. 

-Marty Morantz (Conservative MP): Cited as one of the largest property holders in the House, with joint ownership of 17 residential and multi-unit rental properties in Winnipeg.

-Taleeb Noormohamed (Liberal MP): Drew scrutiny for flipping over 20 residential properties in BC between 2005 and 2021 before entering Parliament.

-Randeep Sarai (Secretary of State for International Development): Solely owns a duplex rental and four rental units in Burnaby, a rental property in Surrey, and discloses further investment and rental income held by his spouse.

-Ahmed Hussen (Former Housing Minister): Criticized for purchasing additional rental properties in Ottawa while serving as the minister responsible for housing affordability. 
———-

Sources:

  1. The Maple: "Find Out If Your MP Is A Landlord Or Invested In Real Estate" (Database and analysis by Davide Mastracci, regularly updated between 2021 and 2024). 

  2. Global News: "Landlords in the House: Advocates see a bias in Parliament against renters" (Investigation and article by David Akin, published June 2026). 

  3. Global News (Video Broadcast): "Canadian government accused of bias against renters in signature housing legislation" (The news segment provided in the previous link).

 

youtu.be
u/Signal-Specific-1704 — 8 days ago

Reminder: Ontario is also bailing out condo developers. 2,200 units, $300M in public funds, same playbook.

Announced in March 2026:

The Building Ontario Fund is “partnering” (providing a low-interest loan) with High Art Capital, a private investment firm, to buy 2,200 unsold condos in the GTA. They plan to convert them into long-term rentals, with only 25% of the units earmarked as “affordable” (defined as 25% below local market rent or 30% of median gross household income across the GTA).

With this $300 million loan from the Ontario government, High Art Capital is raising the rest of the capital from banks and private equity to reach a total purchasing power of $1.3 billion.

It is awfully convenient that the full HST rebate on new homes for all buyers is happening at the same time.

A “right-leaning” government in Ontario has the same playbook and similar numbers to the “left-leaning” government in B.C. We are in class warfare, wake the f up.

Sources:
1-Building Ontario Fund / High Art Capital Partnership Announcement
2-OAA Critique: Ontario shouldn't bail out developers
3-Deeded Industry Breakdown: The $1.3B Buy-up

news.ontario.ca
u/Signal-Specific-1704 — 9 days ago

Carney says B.C. condo buyout proposal is about affordability, not bailouts

The developers didn’t ask for the bailout, but we are giving it to them anyways under the mask of “affordability”.

ctvnews.ca
u/Signal-Specific-1704 — 11 days ago

12 minutes of Vancouver’s development industry gaslighting the tax payers.

Try watching this without your blood boiling.

TLDR:

They said the following:

  1. It’s a complex issue and people don’t understand the situation.

  2. This is about supporting an industry that provides essential services.

  3. Buying the units is a solution for providing subsidized housing for the unhoused.

  4. Prices of these units cannot be lowered because products need to break even and make a profit.

  5. The reason why end consumers aren’t buying now in 2026 compared to 2021 and 2022 is because DCCs are high, not because the investors realized the Ponzi scheme of flipping dogcrate condos is over.

  6. The industry wasn’t asking to be bailed out; this is solely a government’s decision.

  7. The risk of lower immg targets was not anticipated by the developers, and the crisis is the government’s fault (aka lower demand, and which to them is not being able to sell the dogcrates).

  8. Fees, charges, and other forms of taxes were paid by the developers during the good times, thus they’re entitled to a bailout in the bad times (acting as if these costs weren’t passed to the buyers).

  9. Bailing them out is essentially to continue having development completions, and this is necessary to avoid a crisis 3 years down the road.

youtu.be
u/Signal-Specific-1704 — 11 days ago

The Housing Minister solves homelessness in ⁠B.C by generously giving developers a massive bailout. Groundbreaking stuff.

Over Robertson's decade in office as mayor, the overall homeless population in the city of Vancouver grew by roughly 38%. Meanwhile, single-family home values skyrocketed by 179%, and the overall benchmark price rose by just over 100%.

With that amazing record, he is now using the homelessness crisis to justify developer bailouts that artificially keep condo prices high. Instead of allowing housing prices to drop, this enforces a system designed to trap young people and their children into becoming lifelong renters.

u/Signal-Specific-1704 — 12 days ago

"Nobody is getting rich here." – Build Ontario Fund CEO tries to spin developer bailouts as a win for the 500k construction workers who can't even afford to live in the units they work on.

u/Signal-Specific-1704 — 13 days ago

Watch them gaslighting you into thinking a taxpayer funded bailout for unsold Dogcrate condos is actually an affordable housing initiative.

Remarkably, neither the Conservatives nor the NDP have said a single word criticizing this 'genius' move of socializing the losses.

Edit: PP/Conservatives and the Greens have criticized the bailout on X, nothing from Avi Lewis/NDP yet. I will update the post again if Lewis does say something about it.

u/Signal-Specific-1704 — 16 days ago

Carney and Eby announce $3.2B developer subsidy; plan to buy unsold B.C. condos

You thought the HST rebate was bad? Well elbows up suckers, they're not done screwing you over yet.

They are taking your hard earned highly taxed dollars to bail out the very developers who built those dogcrate condos across B.C. The plan? Buy up 2,200 units to artificially set a floor price for the condo market, all while slapping a "social housing" label on it to call it a win.

Nothing is going to change until we vote them out, demand a full corruption investigation and vote for a party that will implement a housing reform policy.

biv.com
u/Signal-Specific-1704 — 16 days ago

Doug Ford and Mark Carney claim $2.2 billion HST rebate on new homes will help renters become owners. Instead, it’s helping the wealthy buy more rental properties

Federal Conservatives want to implement a GST rebate for all buyers on properties up to $1.5 million across all provinces.

This is just a friendly reminder: whether they’re wearing Red or Blue, both sides of the establishment are perfectly fine with screwing you over. They are just cementing the modern feudalist society they’ve spent the last 20+ years creating.

Non-paywall:
https://archive.is/20260601100838/https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/ford-and-carney-claim-22-billion-hst-rebate-on-new-homes-will-help-renters-become-owners-instead-its-helping-the-wealthy-buy-more-rental-properties/article\_b426b1c9-e5d8-41ad-84e4-1b8d48cac424.html

thestar.com
u/Signal-Specific-1704 — 1 month ago

Name and Shame: Developers jacking up prices to absorb the HST rebate

Let's get a list going of developers who are pocketing the recent HST rebate instead of passing the savings onto buyers. Specifically, I’m looking for examples of developers using shady, artificial scarcity tactics.

Have you noticed projects doing any of the following?

1- Jacking up base prices immediately following the HST rebate.
2- Trickling out "phases" with an extremely limited number of units to create false FOMO.
3- Increasing prices with every micro-phase release, even though all the units share the exact same occupancy date/year.

If you have seen this happening, drop the names of the developers and the specific projects in the comments below.

Please provide proof (screenshots, pricing sheets, or links) if you can! Let's hold them accountable.

Edit: The list so for;
A- Forest Hill
B- Greenpark
C- Maggio and Tri-World Development Corp.
D- Minto

reddit.com
u/Signal-Specific-1704 — 1 month ago

Canada’s “correction” is a Toronto & Vancouver story. Every other province is at an all-time high.

For the “just move somewhere cheaper” crowd, and for the honourable Mr. “affordability is the best it’s been in over a decade.”

The national average is down 21% from peak, almost entirely driven by GTA condos and Vancouver. Strip those out and the rest of Canada never corrected. Newfoundland +27.4% above its COVID peak. New Brunswick +19.8%. Saskatchewan +18.8%. Quebec at an all-time benchmark record as of March 2026. Only B.C and Ontario are down from COVID peak.

The Liberal plan promises 500,000 new homes a year, a number Canada has never once achieved in its history, and most probably never will in our lives. “Hoping” to stabilize the prices so income can catch up. The honourable Black-Face himself along with the current Housing minster stated that housing must “retain” its value.

Younger millennials, Gen Z, and Gen Alpha aren’t just at risk of being Canada’s version of Japan’s Lost Generation, at the current pace, they’re being written off as an acceptable casualty of a system that worked beautifully for everyone who got in before them.

Meanwhile, boomers (with medium net worth of $1.1 million) continue to collect maximum OAS even at NET income of 93k a year per individual, costing the tax payers (young poorer families) $80 billion a year.

Edit: the charts with better visuals

u/Signal-Specific-1704 — 2 months ago
▲ 382 r/FleeingCanada+1 crossposts

Quick Facts:

-Median Net Worth: Seniors $1.11M vs. Young Renters (Under-35s) $44k.

-Future Debt Burden: Under-35s carry $117B, while seniors carry $9B.

-Funding Priorities: Federal spending on seniors' benefits has grown 18x faster than spending on housing since 2015. About ~$30B compared to merely ~$1.6B - $3.5B.

-The "Generational Fairness" Irony: The Liberals are still cutting full OAS cheques to seniors making $93k/year, a** **threshold higher than the median family income for young Canadians.

They aren't "ending the housing crisis". They're subsidizing their most reliable voting bloc while the rest of us pay for it.

u/Signal-Specific-1704 — 2 months ago

Carney’s government pledged to double construction to ~500k homes/yr. The goal is stabilizing prices to inflation (~2%/yr), not lowering them.

Assuming 2% housing growth and an optimistic 3.5% wage growth, the price-to-income ratio doesn’t return to 4× until around 2047. Experts cite 4–5 decades for full normalization in high-demand cities.

The Liberal government calls this progress. Two generations sacrificed so existing homeowners (often liberals voters) don’t lose equity.

u/Signal-Specific-1704 — 2 months ago