Dr Laposta’s testimony opinion?
She’s just off the stand(well zoom)- what did you all think of her testimony? And the cross examination?
I get that the DA pointed out she didn’t physically observe Lindsay’s head injuries & can’t 100% know, but I’ve not seen the DA be so passionate with ANY of their own witnesses in the case in chief.
What’s y’all’s thoughts?
(Oh I did a google search asking if it’s “normal” to have no head injuries~significant~ for someone who had a Jefferson fracture & it said it’s very normal, I’ll admit I didn’t do any in depth research though)