u/Status-Job5706

VIVA IL DUCEEEEEEEEE NON PUOI CAPIRE MALE CARTESIO ALLA PRIMA PAGINA VIVA IL DUCEEEEE VAFFANCULO AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

It's in our liturgical language, but it works even in English. (It's a parody of an Italian song, I made it up this morning while dying of heat)

Camminerò, gloria a Stalin/

E continuerò a bastardizzare Marx ed Engels/

Supereroi, come Lenin/

Che si rivolta nella tomba a ogni parola che io dico/

Cento labubu dorate di Marx/

E un effige di Lassale/

Supereroi, solo io e te/

Perché solo insieme imiteremo Xi Jinping.

I wanted to read something against Austrian economics but I'm kinda skeptical of Bukharin. Is this any good?

I think this is right what we need (again, cheka don't bomb my house, this is merely a suggestion, it's not slop)

I recently had a discussion with my keynesian social democrat friend, amd we went over how Bordiga talked about the axis victory as a probability to another economical crisis and another possibility of revolution and so on. And she argued that the ceirtan increase of the wellness of the proletariat (she argued specifically on the olocaust and general plan oost) with the victory of the allied powers would have been better than a probability of revolution, and then went on with deaths and stuff that the revolution would bring(she's kind of an utopic socialist). Now, I thought about it, but that is a kinda good point. How many deaths is worth a probability of revolution? I argued about the deaths that capitalism brings, but that is a kinda weak argument. Is there anything on the topic?

Maybe I straight up got the concept wrong, but what if the plans decided have something wrong? Science, because marxism is a science, is an everevolving concept, and things that were believed to be absolute truths in the past, are today stupid ideas (a blatant example is flat-earth theory). What if, the program or plan decided has problems because of how science works itself? Again, if I'm stupid, anarco-mods nuke my ass.

I was looking through the reading list that the sub made, and I will admit, I have barely started (I'm on Gotha). But I saw that it is advised to read grundrisse at some point. But aren't the points made in the book also in Das? Maybe it's a way of understanding Das more, but again, I'm barely starting out. It just seemed odd to me to read a book and then the manual to writing it. You are allowed to nuke my ass if I'm stupid.

So I was reading Das Kapital (I'm starting out following this sub's reading list) and it is stated that, a dress cannot be exchanged for a dress, an example Marx makes. But a dress can be exchanged for another one if they differ in something (color, lenght) or if they overall have the same Value of Exchange (one is longer so more material is put into it, and the other is made by a more skilled artisan (this then is another doubt I have, but I'll make another post)). Are the answers going to be revealed to me later with the book? Sorry if it's stupid

I am no lump anymore.

I just passed my exam (in Italy so Idk how it differs from the American stuff), so yeah. Now I can save people and stuff lol