I hate when media doesn’t do anything with a sympathetic villain (SPOILERS FOR THE BOYS)
AGAIN, SPOILERS FOR THE BOYS
I’m not saying this is necessarily “bad”, just that I don’t like it. It might be bad, but maybe it’s been done well in something I haven’t seen, so I won’t make that claim.
YOU CAN SKIP THIS CHUNK IF YOU JUST WANT MY MAIN POINT ABOUT THE BOYS. I’ll put a Bold heading before the tldr/important part.
Some villains are just an evil bastard. They’re evil just cause they’re evil. That’s great! You can use them as just an obstacle, they can be a threat, or they can be a vehicle for themes.
Sauron is just evil. Palpatine is just evil. In both cases, they just serve as the thing to fight against. That’s great.
The Joker (typically) doesn’t have any sympathetic backstory. He’s just a crazy motherfucker. He’s terrifying and engaging and it works great.
Umbridge is less evil than those examples, but she’s still super easy to hate and isn’t sympathetic at all.
On the other hand, sympathetic villains can work great. Maybe they have a point, or maybe they are just tragic. Either works.
Killmonger has a point in Black Panther. He straight up convinces our hero. Magneto is sometimes just a nutso mutant supremacist, but he’s often portrayed as being right about humanity, even if he is too extreme about it. Thanos is wrong, but he thinks he is saving people.
On the other hand, you’ve got Darth Vader, or Macbeth, or Two Face. They are villains, but the tragedy of it is a fundamental part of their character. And, maybe they get redeemed, maybe they never get redeemed and that is tragic, or their fall is thematically important.
THE BOYS/My actual point
Homelander is not a redeemable character. He does unforgivable stuff (rape is more impactful than blowing up a planet in fiction), and it is a core storyline of the show of trying to kill Homelander.
But even so, he falls in the “sympathetic” side.
He is shown a couple times to have moments of “doubt”. Maybe it’s not significant, maybe it isn’t even proper remorse, but it is something. We get shown his backstory. We see an actual shot of a baby sitting in an underground sterile cell. We find out he was basically getting tortured/experimented on for his entire childhood.
Even if you don’t feel bad for Homelander, you should feel bad for the kid getting abused and tortured. Just like most sympathetic villains. You don’t need to feel bad for Vader, he did blow up a planet. But you should feel bad that his life went the way it did. You don’t need to forgive Magneto for like, idk, trying to blow up Manhattan, but you should feel bad that his life went the way it did.
And in the case of The Boys, this sympathy for Homelander is fundamental to the original themes of the show. Vought is the villain. Homelander is just a particularly dangerous product of the corporation. I mean, they literally have a “I was just following orders” moment.
Maybe if “John” had gotten to grow up like a normal person, he could’ve been more like Clark Kent. His son, Ryan, is set up as a direct foil to this. He had a mom who loved him, so he is strong enough to be good.
But the show just tosses that aside. Vought survives the finale, the big triumphant moment is killing the tragic manchild, and we forget all about the kid being tortured by the corporation.
If you don’t want me to be thinking about how sad it is that Homelanders life went the way it did, don’t show me it.
If you want to use the tragedy of it for something, great. But don’t just throw in a sympathetic/tragic villain for no reason.