u/TieVirtual9980

Feeling confused

Its been a year since I have completed my Masters in Earthquake engineering, and I have not done anything, I am using Claude too much and building stuffs that i think does not matter, I recently made a compliance check for etabs which will extract every data of etabs and check if its aligned with the Code or not, but other than that I dont have much going on, I cannot go work as a Structural engineer because of my lower back pain, I thought I would take a break for a year to fix my back pain but its like I am good no pain for 2/3 mnths after that all of the sudden my back goes bananas again, I am looking for remote opportunities but for an engineer I dont think there are much opportunities, maybe I am thinking of helping engineers use claude code effectively? I dont know what do you guys recommend I do, feeling kind of super down at the moment, and I am already 27 with nothing in life. Currently in Nepal

reddit.com
u/TieVirtual9980 — 20 hours ago

I made a Report Generator for Etabs

We all know that reports that the etabs model generates is pretty bad, I was hoping to make something like a full structural report generator from the etabs model but I just have this compliance report generator upto now, Its only for NBC though do let me know what do you think: https://etabs-compliance.vercel.app/

u/TieVirtual9980 — 12 days ago

What do you think will it actually work!!!!

https://preview.redd.it/k3ivcdyq5s8h1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=cf8717a0a9deadbf1edcc212fcd9cdf7fd0a6aa2

This is the result I got from Back testing my apps recommendation system
While I am skeptical about it I have done multiple test

I built a rule based system that picks stocks. I'm skeptical of my own results

Results (simulated, costs included):

  • Win rate: 57% over 70 trades (~30-day average hold)
  • Avg per trade: ~+2.7% net of fees/tax (+3.9% gross)
  • Cumulative: +56.8% net · Profit factor ~1.8 net · Max drawdown ~−16%

What I did to check it's not just curve-fitting:

  • Replayed the exact rules across 2007–2026 — data it was never tuned on — and the core edge held in both old and recent market periods.
  • Deflated Sharpe Ratio = 0.996 and Probability of Backtest Overfitting = 0.006 (both say the picks aren't an overfit fluke).
  • Compared against 2,000 random portfolios under the same liquidity/volatility rules it beat them, but only by a modest margin.

So does this look like a real edge, or the classic "great backtest, dies live"? What would you think?

reddit.com
u/TieVirtual9980 — 14 days ago