Performance concerns
So snapshot summaries are out for the first few snapshops of FY27. I've only been with Deloitte for a year now and I already have tons of complaints. I've been on two projects, and on both projects, my managers did not verbally communicate to me that they were unhappy with anything about my work. I've only ever verbally gotten good jobs and thank you for your hard works. Then snapshot summaries come out and I've been consistently marked as average ("agree" on both performance questions) and the comments mention things I've never heard about prior to reading them in the snapshots.
Both projects have also been AI-heavy (no manual coding allowed at all; everything has to be done through the LLM, even bug finding and reviews), and they seem to think that giving us this technology should mean we output 10x more than before, in the same timeframe.
So this most recent snapshot summary that came out today, my manager commented a few nice things but then said that my work "took longer than expected" and "contained errors or discrepancies". This pisses me off for several reasons - the discrepancies he found were not my fault, it was a coworker who decided to mess with my code and do things that were assigned to me. She introduced bugs that I didn't catch until later. And secondly, they straight up did not give us enough time to review the code generated by the LLM. We were building an entire web application from the ground up; thousands of lines of code and hundreds of files being generated at once. More often than not we were asked to finish a full feature in a day or two. They seem to think generated code doesn't need to be thoroughly reviewed, but then complain when there are bugs or errors.
This is all so incredibly unfair. Why does Deloitte operate this way? What's with the rose colored glasses about AI, and forcing the workers to output 10x more in the same time frame, for the same salary?
Anyway. I had been marked as underperforming for FY26 with "agree" in performance questions (almost the exact same situation, AI-heavy, no time to review, no comments until snapshot summary - plus my mother died last year), and now with this lukewarm review for FY27, what can I expect going forward? I fixed all the issues my previous manager had raised in the beginning of FY26 and he said as much, but that made 0 difference and they still marked me as underperforming. They're just gonna mark me as underperforming again, aren't they? No matter what I do?
Should I just start interviewing elsewhere at this point? I was gonna hold off on doing that because I just joined another team/project that seems a lot more interesting than the previous two I've been with, and there's a good chance I can stay with them long term. But if they're just gonna keep pulling this crap in order to avoid giving me bonuses or promote me, I feel like jumping ship is the best option at this point.
Is there something I'm missing here? What is the guidance for my situation?