u/TomatoDisastrous9455

Charger Leaving:

According to the fed narrative-the figure “spidermaned” off the roof, ran into the woods, dumped his gun presumably fled on foot…? Did I miss anyone talking about him going back to get his car somewhere? He went onto campus, parked in the parking garage, left-returned on foot and fled on foot-correct? My memory isn’t serving me.

Do they have visual of TRs charger leaving campus?

reddit.com
u/TomatoDisastrous9455 — 5 days ago

Katie Adjacent-Rachel/Chrome *no hate*

Hello! I am a long time follower of Katie, not a horse person at all, but learning a lot!

ABSOLUTELY no shade to Rachel at all just wondering from a horse person perspective:

Rachel has talked a lot about the issues she has had with chrome and they don’t seem to have a bond. Understandably she is very frustrated with the situation and I don’t intend to pile on to that frustration but I do wonder generally speaking at what point do people with horses decide “this isn’t the right fit”? I know horses get sold regularly based on many factors but I am wondering what the line typically is for most people, what the motivation is to keep a horse you’re not bonding with (sheer stubbornness and will to make it work, cause I would personally kinda get that)? Etc.

Using this situation as an example knowing I don’t know the full story and genuinely wanting to learn! Thanks in advance!

reddit.com
u/TomatoDisastrous9455 — 9 days ago

Watching the JD interview with JSM.

JSM says that the 30.06 explanation is plausible in a previous JD episode. He explained it well enough that even I, who has been a staunch “that wasn’t a 30.06” from day one has now heard Baron out.

I’m mid watch so I don’t know if there is a “conclusion” and I know Baron eluded to the fact that no one changed their minds on the method and means of which Charlie was taken out BUT-based on the lack of preservation of evidence alone, do you think he may be at least leaning towards at the very best case scenario this was a very, very poorly conducted investigation based on the lack of preservation of the crime scene/forensic evidence

Running through the list mentioned so far.

  1. He wants to see the shirt-it is thus far publicly unaccounted for
  2. the Necklace-Frank recovered it and told the police that he would NOT be handing it over and “gave it to Erika” and presumably she has and wears a repaired version of it
  3. the chair-unaccounted for
  4. the tent-in TPUSAs possession
  5. the Mic- in TPUSAs possession.

I’m only 1:47 in so bare with me but do you think this convo at least raised eyebrows because I think questioning of the narrative or at the very least the crime scene handling from a platformed expert would go along way for anyone (who isn’t being paid) that is skeptical of the “conspiracy”

reddit.com
u/TomatoDisastrous9455 — 13 days ago