u/Traditional_Fish_504

▲ 21 r/rs_x

Infantilizing discussion rules

Last night I went to aomething and they were doing the typical spiel where they were outlining how the discussion rules were going to be egalitarian like realize your positionality etc. etc. And they do the ones where “if youve been talking a lot maybe shut the fuck up for a little” where fine, but then they get to this crazy one where apparently you should only use equivocating, subjective language when talking about anything. So you shouldn’t say “the text does this” but “I feel that the text does this.” I’m sorry this annoys me to no end, declaring meaning completely subjective is not woke, if anything it’s neoliberal. Texts and arts are objects in the world that are distinct from our ‘feelings’ and should be treated as such. Also be confident in what you’re saying, what you’re saying doesn’t just have validity because that’s what you feel but because it can say something truly profound or maybe not. Part of being a grown up is the vulnerability to be wrong. They also had this bizarre warning against jargon in a reading group on a dense theoretical text?? I swear the left is infantilizing at times.

reddit.com
u/Traditional_Fish_504 — 17 hours ago
▲ 51 r/rs_x

Jane is not complex

Firstly, her entire character is a plot device for Jesse. Jesse’s character is mostly concerned with finding acceptance and grace from his parents, his brother, Walt, and Jane fits into this lineage. Her character, who also struggles with acceptance, is mostly a fantasy of someone finally recognizing the goodness in Jesse that the audience has been seeing in glimpses. Through her, we see Jesse finally transforming into a good person. At the end of season 2, we see how Jesse’s addiction and involvement in the drug trade will ultimately collapse everything good through Jane.

Anyways, I see people treat jane as this really complex and well thought out figure when I just don’t see it. I think a great character is one that first of all has a degree of autonomy. Gus, Saul, Mike, Tuco, Hector, etc. for instance can be looked at distinct from all the other cast members in compelling ways, when Jane really has nothing going for her outside of Jesse outside of being your standard former addict with a caring father. Part of this is that I think a lot of the women characters in the show are for the most part designed to be plot devices for men rather than really interesting in themselves. I think the love for jane comes from identifying with Jesse’s fantasy and her looking attractive rather than a full character.

reddit.com
u/Traditional_Fish_504 — 4 days ago
▲ 66 r/rs_x

Did People Watch the Same Movie as Me?

People’s love for DWP always confuses me. On the one hand, the movie is a clear 2000s indictment of being thrust into the exciting, corporate world that can completely consume and drain you. You’re working in a toxic, cutthroat work culture with an absolutely monstrous boss that will dispose of you if you don’t fulfill the most absurd, unworkable things and a career ladder that will get rid of you in a heartbeat. The only way to keep your job is to be a state of perpetual misery.

I think one of the strange parts of the movie is that I think the audience gets so absorbed in the exciting world of fashion that the critique gets lost. Miranda is not abusive she’s just a snarky, misunderstood career woman. Andy is just doing the 996 grind to make her dreams, but also the audience’s dream, come true. Women have soul crushing demands on their bodies and appearances where they will be bullied if they are not bulemic, wearing heels, and dressing in a certain manner. I wonder if this is because working such ridiculous hours and having no work life balance has just been normalized in the real world so people can’t see the movie’s critique.

On Nate, I was disappointed by the ending of the movie. She finally got her “serious” job and stepped away from the bright world of appearances in fashion, and I think the movie doesn’t do enough to show what lessons she learned in her time in fashion other than overworking? Maybe lessons on how to express herself? Which is why the ending is so frustrating because her aspirations don’t change, she goes into this wanting to be with her bf and do journalism, and that’s the ending too. That being said, hating on Nate for being upset is insane because I couldn’t date someone for a year where i only saw them at like 10 PM when they would crash sleeping and then they would leave at the crack of dawn.

u/Traditional_Fish_504 — 8 days ago
▲ 24 r/rs_x

Weed discourse in the 00s was insane

Please tell me why they were telling people that they would become full on meth heads living in trap houses if they smoked weed. Ronald fucking Reagan justified so much abhorrent shit with victim blaming poor people instead of helping society.

u/Traditional_Fish_504 — 9 days ago
▲ 73 r/rs_x

Was talking to the husband of a friend that was parroting the annoying “well marx would work if everyone wasn’t an individual, communism is when everything is the same.” This has always been such a strange take.

First of all, in the gotha program marx advocates having a system of labor vouchers where you get paid based off how much you work, and then once everything is developed enough people slowly stop working. There’s no part of marx that says communism is when you do all the work but get nothing. There is a social system that does that, a system where the people that actually generate value get barely any of the end product.

Secondly, there’s this weird presupposition from capitalists that expressing individuality requires a relatively large wealth disparity. Like most of the ‘the people’s’ demands are not to become capitalists necessarily but just to get basic security. Like getting an 8 hour work day with a lot of vacation days and job security will allow people to express their individual interests far more than stuffing people to the brim with debt that is impossible to work off so they can buy some shiny trendy commodities.

Linked to the second is capitalism’s ever shifting force to enshittification/ensloppification. Since the world is purely governed by logics of efficiency, everything slowly becomes the same, reducing the possibility for genuinely expressing individuality.

Anyways, always weird that you’ll meet the partners of the most radical academics and they will have these kinds of takes. Like these people will denounce their colleagues for not supporting an immediate revolution but with their partner as long as they say some empty shit like “genocide is wrong” it’s okay.

reddit.com
u/Traditional_Fish_504 — 23 days ago