Late Term Abortions in Cases Where the Fetus is Suffering
I came across a thread on Facebook recently that absolutely floored me. Obviously, there's been a lot of discourse circulating around states enacting "abortion up to birth" laws and this post was claiming that there is *never* a valid reason to terminate the fetus before delivering it. I countered this argument with a few examples where the fetus would be suffering in utero for the entire second half of pregnancy (24+ weeks) and is guaranteed to die after birth (cases like osteogenesis imperfecta type 2 where the fetus will feel its bones breaking in utero until delivery and will die a painful death shortly after birth, or intra-uterine inoperable tumors that will suffocate the fetus if allowed to progress to full term, etc.).
I originally assumed the *objectively* correct choice would be the one that results in the least suffering for the fetus, which would be a lethal injection in utero followed by inducing labor like any other delivery. This would spare the fetus any further suffering, spare it the pain of childbirth (imagine an OI-2 fetus being pushed through the birth canal), spare the mother the pain and recovery of a C-section (alternative to vaginal birth), and spare both parents the trauma of watching their baby die in their arms after birth (which some parents may prefer, and some may not, and both are valid). This would essentially be a mercy killing in the form of inducing a stillbirth. I was quite surprised when pro-lifers began blowing up the thread with responses basically saying they would absolutely let the fetus suffer for 10-20 weeks in utero, either on the off-chance of a misdiagnosis or simply to avoid having a *gasp* abortion.
I eventually gave up on responding to that thread because I was so floored by the responses, but the topic is an interesting one to delve into and I feel like this community can engage with it in a much more thoughtful manner. So, tell me, PC and PL, do you think lethal injection is a morally acceptable form of abortion to spare a fetus that will suffer in utero if carried to full term?
Note that many of the commenters assumed for some reason that the fetus would be dismembered alive in the process?? That is absolutely NOT the case. I am specifically referring to a lethal injection followed by induced labor. If dismemberment is necessary, the fetus is probably already dead and there's a valid reason why this is the safest way to remove it.