u/Turbulent_Agent_9943

Numerical Approach to the Hilbert-Pólya Conjecture: Constructing a Hamiltonian from the 6n ± 1 Arithmetic

Hi everyone,I’ve been working on a two-part research project that bridges the gap between elementary number theory and quantum spectral analysis. The goal was to find a physical motivation for the Riemann zeros using the inherent structure of the 6n ± 1 sequence.

Part 1: The Wave Interference Model (IWM)I started by treating prime numbers as points of "Zero Wave Density" ($\Phi=0$) in a deterministic interference pattern. This framework allows for a visualization of the prime distribution not as a random sequence, but as a resonance phenomenon.

Paper: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20112919

Code: https://github.com/model-vpr/deterministic-wave-prime-prediction

Part 2: The Crown HamiltonianBy mapping the 6n ± 1 progressions into a Schrödinger-type equation, a specific Hamiltonian emerges. The key finding is a centrifugal barrier term 3/(4r^2), which implies an angular momentum l=1/2.

This symmetry seems to "force" the spectrum onto the critical line Re(s)=1/2.

Numerical Results: Using sparse matrix diagonalization, I found a monotonic bijection between the operator’s eigenvalues and the first 10,000 Riemann zeros with a correlation of R^2 > 0.9999.

Paper: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20267135

Code: https://github.com/model-vpr/riemann-hamiltonian

I am looking for feedback specifically on the numerical mapping and whether this constructive approach to the Hilbert-Pólya conjecture aligns with current spectral theories.

reddit.com
u/Turbulent_Agent_9943 — 5 days ago

Numerical Approach to the Hilbert-Pólya Conjecture: Constructing a Hamiltonian from the 6n ± 1 Arithmetic

Hi everyone,I’ve been working on a two-part research project that bridges the gap between elementary number theory and quantum spectral analysis. The goal was to find a physical motivation for the Riemann zeros using the inherent structure of the 6n ± 1 sequence.

Part 1: The Wave Interference Model (IWM)I started by treating prime numbers as points of "Zero Wave Density" ($\Phi=0$) in a deterministic interference pattern. This framework allows for a visualization of the prime distribution not as a random sequence, but as a resonance phenomenon.

Paper: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20112919

Code: https://github.com/model-vpr/deterministic-wave-prime-prediction

Part 2: The Crown HamiltonianBy mapping the 6n ± 1 progressions into a Schrödinger-type equation, a specific Hamiltonian emerges. The key finding is a centrifugal barrier term 3/(4r^2), which implies an angular momentum l=1/2.

This symmetry seems to "force" the spectrum onto the critical line Re(s)=1/2.

Numerical Results: Using sparse matrix diagonalization, I found a monotonic bijection between the operator’s eigenvalues and the first 10,000 Riemann zeros with a correlation of R^2 > 0.9999.

Paper: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20267135

Code: https://github.com/model-vpr/riemann-hamiltonian

I am looking for feedback specifically on the numerical mapping and whether this constructive approach to the Hilbert-Pólya conjecture aligns with current spectral theories.

reddit.com
u/Turbulent_Agent_9943 — 5 days ago

A novel method for generating large prime numbers

Hello r/CryptoTechnology,I’ve developed a novel method for generating large prime numbers that bypasses the traditional Miller-Rabin trial-and-error paradigm. Instead of sieving, it uses a constructive spectral law derived from the non-trivial Riemann zeta zeros.The results (benchmarked on a standard i7 CPU):Code 1 (parallel, gmpy2): ~13.8 ms per 1024-bit prime.Code 2 (pure Python): ~36 ms per 1024-bit prime using a Riemann-von Mangoldt explicit formula extraction.I recently submitted this to two major journals (including one in mathematical physics). Both gave me a "desk reject" within days without a technical review, likely because I am an independent researcher without a PhD. https://github.com/model-vpr/ultrafast-spectral-primes

Preprint (Zenodo): https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19893929

I’m inviting everyone here to clone the repo, run the benchmarks, and try to break it. Is there a statistical bias I’m missing, or is this as revolutionary for key generation as the numbers suggest?

u/Turbulent_Agent_9943 — 18 days ago