Has anyone actually tested the 120MP photo / 16K timelapse quality on the X6 vs. Osmo 360 Gen 2?
After using the Insta360 X5 for two months and the original Osmo 360 for about a year, I’ve come to the conclusion that last-gen 360 cameras are basically only good for one thing: reframing flat video. The 8K 360 video quality is nowhere near sharp enough to be immersive in a VR headset.
Photo mode on previous hardware was equally frustrating for different reasons:
- X5: High-res HDR panos took around 10 seconds to capture and dozens of seconds to process, making it painful for spontaneous shooting.
- Osmo 360 (Gen 1): The 120MP mode lacked HDR completely. In a 360 scene where harsh dynamic range is inevitable, highlights were always blown and shadows crushed. On top of that, the compression was ridiculously aggressive, killing the actual detail.
With the current gen (X6 / Osmo 360 Gen 2), it looks like 8K video hasn't fundamentally changed without higher bitrates or real supersampling. But the photo specs caught my eye—both now push 120MP HDR stills (assuming X6 has it like before) and 16K timelapses.
My primary use cases for these cameras aren't action vlogging, but:
- Viewing high-res 360 stills in VR
- Interval capture on long road trips
- Gathering clean image datasets for Gaussian Splatting (3DGS)
Has anyone had hands-on time to test the real-world photo quality, dynamic range, and processing times between the X6 and Osmo 360 Gen 2? Is the 120MP actually usable this time around without insane compression or workflow bottlenecks? This is pretty much the sole deciding factor for whether I upgrade and which one I pick.